Correction: Article is via @JWalu https://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560- 4380642-lfxopw/index.html The discussion the Lands ministry should have been having with the lawyers is about how to amend the law to enable end-to-end land transactions rather than how to protect the lawyers from the inevitable disruption that technology is bringing. LSK argument for remaining analogue, being anti digital.. https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/news/Ministry-switch-to-online-land-regi... LSK cites section 34 of the Advocates Act which states: “No unqualified person shall, either directly or indirectly, take instructions, draw or prepare any document or instrument relating to the conveyancing of property.” https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/news/Ministry-switch-to-online- land-registry-sparks-row-with-LSK/539546-4376104-i3oh05/index.html On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM, S.M. Muraya <[email protected]> wrote:
Noted well @walu
The discussion the Lands ministry should have been having with the lawyers is about how to amend the law to enable end-to-end land transactions rather than how to protect the lawyers from the inevitable disruption that technology is bringing.
https://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560- 4380642-lfxopw/index.html
-- SMM *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one who takes a city." Prov 16:32*