Correction: Article is via @JWalu

https://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-4380642-lfxopw/index.html

The discussion the Lands ministry should have been having with the lawyers is about how to amend the law to enable end-to-end land transactions rather than how to protect the lawyers from the inevitable disruption that technology is bringing.


LSK argument for remaining analogue, being anti digital..


LSK cites section 34 of the Advocates Act which states: “No unqualified person shall, either directly or indirectly, take instructions, draw or prepare any document or instrument relating to the conveyancing of property.”



https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/news/Ministry-switch-to-online-land-registry-sparks-row-with-LSK/539546-4376104-i3oh05/index.html


On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM, S.M. Muraya <murigi.muraya@gmail.com> wrote:
Noted well @walu

The discussion the Lands ministry should have been having with the lawyers is about how to amend the law to enable end-to-end land transactions rather than how to protect the lawyers from the inevitable disruption that technology is bringing.




--
SMM

"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one who takes a city." Prov 16:32