Hi Rimas, Sorry, but I don't remember for sure which module(s) that it was. I had noticed that you replaced Pear::DB though... BTW, I am currently sorting though the Vexim patches that have been made since 2012 and I am patching Exim4U with many of your patches and improvements. It may be a while before I'm done but I hope to have most of the patches implemented soon. Thanks! I concur that there are advantages to moving away from php to some type of framework or forms generator. There are subtle differences in Vexim and Exim4U, particularly related to the exim configuration and how/when spam and viruses are processed, that would need to be reconciled for the same development work to easily be applied to both projects. I am sure that we could work that out though. Gordon On 12/24/2014 06:29 AM, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
Hi,
2014.12.22 22:25, Gordon Dickens wrote:
I've got a FreeBSD 10.1 testing installation and I first tried to use php55 and encountered problems, however, its been awhile since I set it up so I don't remember exactly what the problems were. To my best recollection, some extensions or pear modules that I needed were not yet available but I can't say for sure. In any event, I ended up just swtiching to php5 (5.4.35) instead. I'm using Apache24 without any issues. Could it have been Peer:DB maybe? This is something I've already replaced with PDO in Vexim last year, but Exim4U hasn't picked up this change.
BTW I'm currently thinking about rewriting the whole web-facing Vexim app, building it on some sort of a framework, with proper MVC separation. I wonder if using a bigger framework as a base would discourage Exim4U or end users from adopting that rewrite. What do you think?
Rimas
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users(a)exim4u.org https://exim4u.org/mailman/listinfo/users