Listers, We would like to conclude the five day discussion on the Cyber Crimes Bill. Many thanks to those who have taken their time to share their views on the bill over the five day period. We will summarize the issues and submit a report on the list. We will share the same with the Ministry. Feel free to submit any more comments on the bill as we finalize our report. Thank you Best Regards Barrack and Karis On 8/1/16, Kelvin Kariuki via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:

Dear Listers,

Our sincere apologies as we were unable to post this topic on Friday. Thank you for your continued contribution on the previous topics, feel free to still comment on them under their respective mail stream.

This section is made up of the following sub-sections: 1 — Short title 2 — Interpretation 3 — Objects of the Act

You can access the bill here: http://www.mygov.go.ke/?p=11234 or download the attached document.

The Concerns 1. Are you okay with the title of this Act? If no, what is your suggestions? 2. On the interpretation part, is there any word that you feel has not been interpreted in the right manner? If yes, kindly state it and along with your preferred definition. 3. Do you think this act has exhausted all the objects required to effectively carry out cyber-crimes investigation and prosecution? 4. Is there any other concern you have regarding this part? Feel free to raise it under this mail stream.

We are looking forward to a fruitful discussion on the above concerns and much more.

Thank you. Barrack and Karis.

Best Regards,

Kelvin Kariuki Twitter Handle: @teacherkaris Alt email: kkariuki@mmu.ac.ke Mobile: +2547 29 385 557

-- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254733206359 Skype: barrack.otieno PGP ID: 0x2611D86A