The bidding for most of 2017 elections tech is already closed. I am not sure how they will navigate this. See here the tendering documents: http://www.iebc.or.ke/index.php/2015-01-15-11-10-24/downloads/category/ict

On 23 Sep 2016, at 3:11 PM, [email protected] wrote:

Send kictanet mailing list submissions to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..." Today's Topics:

1. Tech and Elections Law (Daudi Were) 2. Re: Tech and Elections Law (Alex Watila)

From: Daudi Were <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [kictanet] Tech and Elections Law Date: 23 September 2016 at 2:49:11 PM EAT To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

Listers,

The Elections Law (Amendment) Bill, 2016 <http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/bills/2016/ElectionsLaw_Amendment_Bill_2016.pdf> [pdf 606 KB] was tabled in Bunge on 26th August.

Nine parts that jumped out at me. 2(e) defines "biometric" which includes "signatures" 4(2) IEBC has to a "public web portal" for inspection of the register of members of the public. 44(2) IEBC to develop a policy on the progressive use of technology in the electoral process. 44(7)(a) technology used for 2017 restricted to the process of voter registration, identification of voters and results transmission; (No electronic voting this time round) On the tech itself (open source only solutions?) 44 (3) technology should be simple, accurate, verifiable, secure, accountable and transparent. 44 (5)(f) IEBC and others need "access to electoral system software source codes" On timelines IEBC 8A. (1) at least six months before a general election, engage a professional reputable firm to conduct an audit of the Register of Voters 44 (7)(b) tech has to be procured at least eight months before the general election (Dec 2016 for an Aug 2017 election) 44 (7)(b) test, verify and deploy such technology at least sixty days before a general election. I suspect some of the members here were instrumental in drafting section 44. I would be interested to hear their thoughts on the process. Particularly interested in the push for open source software. (Disclosure, I am currently the CEO of Ushahidi <https://www.ushahidi.com/> - we build and use open source software) whether we feel the timelines are realistic

-- Daudi Were | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Technology + Strategy Too brief? Here's why! http://emailcharter.org <http://emailcharter.org/>

From: "Alex Watila" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Tech and Elections Law Date: 23 September 2016 at 3:01:00 PM EAT To: "'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

Dear all, I think it was unwise to write specific technologies into the law as technology moves e.g. · Biometric is no longer considered secure because of 3d printing · Why insist on a web portal while sms verification worked well in the past? · Technology is not a panacea to all electoral issues i.e. the people, procedure and policy issues need to be resolved

Regards,

Alex

From: kictanet [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Daudi Were via kictanet Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 2:49 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Daudi Were <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [kictanet] Tech and Elections Law

Listers,

The Elections Law (Amendment) Bill, 2016 <http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/bills/2016/ElectionsLaw_Amendment_Bill_2016.pdf> [pdf 606 KB] was tabled in Bunge on 26th August.

Nine parts that jumped out at me. 2(e) defines "biometric" which includes "signatures" 4(2) IEBC has to a "public web portal" for inspection of the register of members of the public. 44(2) IEBC to develop a policy on the progressive use of technology in the electoral process. 44(7)(a) technology used for 2017 restricted to the process of voter registration, identification of voters and results transmission; (No electronic voting this time round) On the tech itself (open source only solutions?) 44 (3) technology should be simple, accurate, verifiable, secure, accountable and transparent. 44 (5)(f) IEBC and others need "access to electoral system software source codes" On timelines IEBC 8A. (1) at least six months before a general election, engage a professional reputable firm to conduct an audit of the Register of Voters 44 (7)(b) tech has to be procured at least eight months before the general election (Dec 2016 for an Aug 2017 election) 44 (7)(b) test, verify and deploy such technology at least sixty days before a general election. I suspect some of the members here were instrumental in drafting section 44. I would be interested to hear their thoughts on the process. Particularly interested in the push for open source software. (Disclosure, I am currently the CEO of Ushahidi <https://www.ushahidi.com/> - we build and use open source software) whether we feel the timelines are realistic

-- Daudi Were | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Technology + Strategy Too brief? Here's why! http://emailcharter.org <http://emailcharter.org/>

_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet> Moses Karanja | @Mose_Karanja <https://twitter.com/Mose_Karanja> | PGP: 0x1529552F <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=index&fingerprint=on&search=0x1529552F>