Fw: [DigAfrica] How broke company won tender
----- Original Message ----- From: <alice@apc.org> To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl@lyris.idrc.ca> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:51 PM Subject: Fw: [DigAfrica] How broke company won tender
This is scandalous! more so as consumers continue to suffer the consequences of a duopoly.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How broke company won tender
By Gordon Opiyo
Details of how companies that were in the red won the country's third mobile license have been exposed.
Initial investigations by the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission into the award of the license in 2003 show that two of the major shareholders in consortium were had financial difficulties at the time of the award.
The investigations could expose what could be one of the country's biggest public tendering scandals.
At the same time, court documents from the South African High Court have shed more light into intricacies that led to the controversial award.
Audited accounts of Econet Wireless International made available to `The Sunday Standard' show that the company's financial state was so bad in 2003 that they could not qualify for an overdraft from any international bank.
Sources at the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission say investigators were startled at the state of accounts of the two main shareholders.
The winning consortium consisted of Kenya National Federation of Co- operatives 81 per cent, Econet Wireless International 10 per cent, Rapsel and Corporate Africa each with 4.5 per cent.
The Communications Commission of Kenya required members of the consortium to have a minimum turn over of $100 million (Sh7.5 billion).
"Econet's and Kenya National Federation of Co-operatives' records could not pass any basic stage even in low capital expenditure projects," says a senior investigator at the anti- graft body.
The turn over of Econet Wireless International in that year was $8 million that of Econet Satellite Services was $9 million, while Econet Wireless New Zealand, was in deficit. Thus the total turnover of companies that qualified for the Econet bid was less than $20 million.
With the other partners not being financially stable, the consortium fell short of the minimum financial requirements by well over $80 million.
Accounts audited by the London-based Deloitte & Touche LLP paint a gloomy picture of the state of affairs at Econet Wireless International.
In one of the reports, auditors declare that Econet Wireless Limited, Company Registration No. 4149948, in the year ended June 30, 2003, urgently needed a cash injection.
The auditors say: "Each of the Group's (Econet's) Investment requires additional financing in the short term in order to develop their businesses which could then support the carrying values of these investments in the group's balance sheet.
The ability of these investment businesses to raise further financing is not known with any reasonable degree of certainty at this time. "
The auditors also declare the Econet group could not acquire overdraft facilities at the time it acquired Kenya's third GSM license.
The auditors declare: "The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, however, the company is in the process of obtaining further funds to finance ongoing day to day operations and to finance future capital expenditure."
The report continues: " In this respect the directors are aware that they do not have overdraft facilities and there is an immediate and ongoing need to raise cash to fund day to day operations of the company and group and to finance the construction of the New Zealand Telecommunications network." On June 28, Co-operatives Development minister Njeru Ndwiga shocked the nation when he announced that the group that had acquired the 81 per cent stake in the third mobile company was bankrupt.
Ndwiga announced KNFC was indebted to the tune of Sh40 million against an asset base of Sh25 million.
Ndwiga said the cash-strapped organisation was unable to honuor basic financial obligations such as its Sh1.3 million monthly wage bill, repayment of a Sh10 million loan from the Cooperative Bank, Sh5.6 million in statutory deductions and Sh800, 000 in legal fees.
The minister said that the printing press worth Sh20 million was vandalised. Ndwiga's revelation came months after The Sunday Standard exclusively reported that the company was unable to honour its obligations in the mobile phone company.
As a result, the minister banned all officials of KNFC from holding any position within the co-operative sector.
The other shareholder, Manga Mugwe of Rapsel Limited had a dispute with Kenya Commercial Bank over a loan.
More details of the financial state of Econet Wireless International came into the public domain in June this year at the South African High Court. Econet had taken its former finance director, Mwaura Njiri, to court; accusing him of using confidential information he got during his tenure to hurt the company.
In the case number 05/12059 that was heard at the Witwatersrand Local Division, Mwaura defended himself against the allegations. In a sworn affidavit explaining how funds for the license fee were raised, Mwaura says, "The first applicant's (Econet Wireless International Limited) balance sheet at that time was so bad that it (Econet) was unable to obtain funds from any bank.
The First applicant in fact had been unable to raise the required amount of $27 million ."
Mwaura, during whose tenure Econet bid for the license says the company managed to get funding as a result of his personal commitment.
As Econet drags its feet on its roll out plan, the two existing mobile companies continue making huge profits as the public pays heavily for their services.
source : http://www.eastandard.net/hm_news/news.php?articleid=29062
Dig Africa site welcomes you to join us at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/Digafrica
Also if you are interested to join a Swahili/English discussion group click http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/kiswahili
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "DigAfrica" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DigAfrica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's worse is that it took so long to come out! Where have we been looking? Or not? FE At 04:06 PM 9/21/2005 +0300, you wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: <alice@apc.org> To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl@lyris.idrc.ca> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:51 PM Subject: Fw: [DigAfrica] How broke company won tender
This is scandalous! more so as consumers continue to suffer the consequences of a duopoly....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How broke company won tender
By Gordon Opiyo
Details of how companies that were in the red won the country's third mobile license have been exposed.
Initial investigations by the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission into the award of the license in 2003 show that two of the major shareholders in consortium were had financial difficulties at the time of the award.
The investigations could expose what could be one of the country's biggest public tendering scandals.
At the same time, court documents from the South African High Court have shed more light into intricacies that led to the controversial award.
Audited accounts of Econet Wireless International made available to `The Sunday Standard' show that the company's financial state was so bad in 2003 that they could not qualify for an overdraft from any international bank.
Sources at the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission say investigators were startled at the state of accounts of the two main shareholders.
The winning consortium consisted of Kenya National Federation of Co- operatives 81 per cent, Econet Wireless International 10 per cent, Rapsel and Corporate Africa each with 4.5 per cent.
The Communications Commission of Kenya required members of the consortium to have a minimum turn over of $100 million (Sh7.5 billion).
"Econet's and Kenya National Federation of Co-operatives' records could not pass any basic stage even in low capital expenditure projects," says a senior investigator at the anti- graft body.
The turn over of Econet Wireless International in that year was $8 million that of Econet Satellite Services was $9 million, while Econet Wireless New Zealand, was in deficit. Thus the total turnover of companies that qualified for the Econet bid was less than $20 million.
With the other partners not being financially stable, the consortium fell short of the minimum financial requirements by well over $80 million.
Accounts audited by the London-based Deloitte & Touche LLP paint a gloomy picture of the state of affairs at Econet Wireless International.
In one of the reports, auditors declare that Econet Wireless Limited, Company Registration No. 4149948, in the year ended June 30, 2003, urgently needed a cash injection.
The auditors say: "Each of the Group's (Econet's) Investment requires additional financing in the short term in order to develop their businesses which could then support the carrying values of these investments in the group's balance sheet.
The ability of these investment businesses to raise further financing is not known with any reasonable degree of certainty at this time. "
The auditors also declare the Econet group could not acquire overdraft facilities at the time it acquired Kenya's third GSM license.
The auditors declare: "The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, however, the company is in the process of obtaining further funds to finance ongoing day to day operations and to finance future capital expenditure."
The report continues: " In this respect the directors are aware that they do not have overdraft facilities and there is an immediate and ongoing need to raise cash to fund day to day operations of the company and group and to finance the construction of the New Zealand Telecommunications network." On June 28, Co-operatives Development minister Njeru Ndwiga shocked the nation when he announced that the group that had acquired the 81 per cent stake in the third mobile company was bankrupt.
Ndwiga announced KNFC was indebted to the tune of Sh40 million against an asset base of Sh25 million.
Ndwiga said the cash-strapped organisation was unable to honuor basic financial obligations such as its Sh1.3 million monthly wage bill, repayment of a Sh10 million loan from the Cooperative Bank, Sh5.6 million in statutory deductions and Sh800, 000 in legal fees.
The minister said that the printing press worth Sh20 million was vandalised. Ndwiga's revelation came months after The Sunday Standard exclusively reported that the company was unable to honour its obligations in the mobile phone company.
As a result, the minister banned all officials of KNFC from holding any position within the co-operative sector.
The other shareholder, Manga Mugwe of Rapsel Limited had a dispute with Kenya Commercial Bank over a loan.
More details of the financial state of Econet Wireless International came into the public domain in June this year at the South African High Court. Econet had taken its former finance director, Mwaura Njiri, to court; accusing him of using confidential information he got during his tenure to hurt the company.
In the case number 05/12059 that was heard at the Witwatersrand Local Division, Mwaura defended himself against the allegations. In a sworn affidavit explaining how funds for the license fee were raised, Mwaura says, "The first applicant's (Econet Wireless International Limited) balance sheet at that time was so bad that it (Econet) was unable to obtain funds from any bank.
The First applicant in fact had been unable to raise the required amount of $27 million ."
Mwaura, during whose tenure Econet bid for the license says the company managed to get funding as a result of his personal commitment.
As Econet drags its feet on its roll out plan, the two existing mobile companies continue making huge profits as the public pays heavily for their services.
source : http://www.eastandard.net/hm_news/news.php?articleid=29062
Dig Africa site welcomes you to join us at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/Digafrica
Also if you are interested to join a Swahili/English discussion group click http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/kiswahili
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "DigAfrica" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DigAfrica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
For everyone's information very few companies when applying for a license have the money "in the bank" - most of the time they have lined up the funding which is triggered when the license is awarded. On the question of turnover does anyone here want to claim that Kenya's cooperatives have less than 7 billion shillings of turnover? I'm not taking sides here, just asking questions that I think should straighten what is clearly spurios reasoning... Brian On 21 Sep 2005, at 16:06, <alice@apc.org> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: <alice@apc.org> To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl@lyris.idrc.ca> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:51 PM Subject: Fw: [DigAfrica] How broke company won tender
This is scandalous! more so as consumers continue to suffer the consequences of a duopoly.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
How broke company won tender
By Gordon Opiyo
Details of how companies that were in the red won the country's third mobile license have been exposed.
Initial investigations by the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission into the award of the license in 2003 show that two of the major shareholders in consortium were had financial difficulties at the time of the award.
The investigations could expose what could be one of the country's biggest public tendering scandals.
At the same time, court documents from the South African High Court have shed more light into intricacies that led to the controversial award.
Audited accounts of Econet Wireless International made available to `The Sunday Standard' show that the company's financial state was so bad in 2003 that they could not qualify for an overdraft from any international bank.
Sources at the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission say investigators were startled at the state of accounts of the two main shareholders.
The winning consortium consisted of Kenya National Federation of Co- operatives 81 per cent, Econet Wireless International 10 per cent, Rapsel and Corporate Africa each with 4.5 per cent.
The Communications Commission of Kenya required members of the consortium to have a minimum turn over of $100 million (Sh7.5 billion).
"Econet's and Kenya National Federation of Co-operatives' records could not pass any basic stage even in low capital expenditure projects," says a senior investigator at the anti- graft body.
The turn over of Econet Wireless International in that year was $8 million that of Econet Satellite Services was $9 million, while Econet Wireless New Zealand, was in deficit. Thus the total turnover of companies that qualified for the Econet bid was less than $20 million.
With the other partners not being financially stable, the consortium fell short of the minimum financial requirements by well over $80 million.
Accounts audited by the London-based Deloitte & Touche LLP paint a gloomy picture of the state of affairs at Econet Wireless International.
In one of the reports, auditors declare that Econet Wireless Limited, Company Registration No. 4149948, in the year ended June 30, 2003, urgently needed a cash injection.
The auditors say: "Each of the Group's (Econet's) Investment requires additional financing in the short term in order to develop their businesses which could then support the carrying values of these investments in the group's balance sheet.
The ability of these investment businesses to raise further financing is not known with any reasonable degree of certainty at this time. "
The auditors also declare the Econet group could not acquire overdraft facilities at the time it acquired Kenya's third GSM license.
The auditors declare: "The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, however, the company is in the process of obtaining further funds to finance ongoing day to day operations and to finance future capital expenditure."
The report continues: " In this respect the directors are aware that they do not have overdraft facilities and there is an immediate and ongoing need to raise cash to fund day to day operations of the company and group and to finance the construction of the New Zealand Telecommunications network." On June 28, Co-operatives Development minister Njeru Ndwiga shocked the nation when he announced that the group that had acquired the 81 per cent stake in the third mobile company was bankrupt.
Ndwiga announced KNFC was indebted to the tune of Sh40 million against an asset base of Sh25 million.
Ndwiga said the cash-strapped organisation was unable to honuor basic financial obligations such as its Sh1.3 million monthly wage bill, repayment of a Sh10 million loan from the Cooperative Bank, Sh5.6 million in statutory deductions and Sh800, 000 in legal fees.
The minister said that the printing press worth Sh20 million was vandalised. Ndwiga's revelation came months after The Sunday Standard exclusively reported that the company was unable to honour its obligations in the mobile phone company.
As a result, the minister banned all officials of KNFC from holding any position within the co-operative sector.
The other shareholder, Manga Mugwe of Rapsel Limited had a dispute with Kenya Commercial Bank over a loan.
More details of the financial state of Econet Wireless International came into the public domain in June this year at the South African High Court. Econet had taken its former finance director, Mwaura Njiri, to court; accusing him of using confidential information he got during his tenure to hurt the company.
In the case number 05/12059 that was heard at the Witwatersrand Local Division, Mwaura defended himself against the allegations. In a sworn affidavit explaining how funds for the license fee were raised, Mwaura says, "The first applicant's (Econet Wireless International Limited) balance sheet at that time was so bad that it (Econet) was unable to obtain funds from any bank.
The First applicant in fact had been unable to raise the required amount of $27 million ."
Mwaura, during whose tenure Econet bid for the license says the company managed to get funding as a result of his personal commitment.
As Econet drags its feet on its roll out plan, the two existing mobile companies continue making huge profits as the public pays heavily for their services.
source : http://www.eastandard.net/hm_news/news.php?articleid=29062
Dig Africa site welcomes you to join us at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/Digafrica
Also if you are interested to join a Swahili/English discussion group click http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/kiswahili
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "DigAfrica" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DigAfrica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
On 21 Sep 2005, at 22:06, Brian Longwe wrote:
I'm not taking sides here, just asking questions that I think should straighten what is clearly spurios reasoning...
I don't normally reply to my own emails - but I just realised that my mention of spurious reasoning yesterday might have been misconstrued to be referring to the comments made by my colleagues Alice and Florence. I would like to make a correction - I was not referring to them but rather to the conclusion reached in the press article by the author, which seem to have been based on questionable sources of information. Apologies to all for any misunderstanding :-) Brian
Hi all, This is in response to Brian's explanation below. It is in my opinion a good thing to question and to raise issues when things are unclear or come to light. It is precisely for this reason that we have a tool such as a discussion list. So Brian as long as you remain courteous and decent, you may ask all you can. In my opinion it is a good learning and information tool. Cheers, FE At 09:04 AM 9/22/2005 +0300, Brian Longwe wrote:
On 21 Sep 2005, at 22:06, Brian Longwe wrote:
I'm not taking sides here, just asking questions that I think should
straighten what is clearly spurios reasoning...
I don't normally reply to my own emails - but I just realised that my mention of spurious reasoning yesterday might have been misconstrued to be referring to the comments made by my colleagues Alice and Florence. I would like to make a correction - I was not referring to them but rather to the conclusion reached in the press article by the author, which seem to have been based on questionable sources of information.
Apologies to all for any misunderstanding :-)
Brian _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
I find it interesting that you attack the journalist when the circumstances and facts point to the contrary. The Minister for Co-operatives himself declared that KNFC was bankrupt. Kenya's cooperatives were invited to take up shareholding in the vehicle designed for shareholding process ie Ushirika Communications but they themselves were not applicants. However KNFC Ltd (an independent entity on its own) and not the cooperative sector as you claim applied for the licence and thus if KNFC is indeed bankrupt and was the applicant, they cannot lay claim to the assets and turnover of other independent entities that were not party to the application for the licence. It is also quickly forgotten how the foreigners in question went ahead and removed KNFC from their consortium, yet we find some of us cheering on such acts while Kenyans and disenfranchised by unscrupulous foreigners. If you wish to refer to the bankruptcy declaration it is well documented in the following article : http://www.eastandard.net/archives/cl/mags/fs/news.php?articleid=23927 *Umbrella union bankrupt, says minister* "The union is indebted to the tune of Sh40 million against an asset base of Sh25 million. The numbers speak for themselves. The regulator failed to do adequate due diligence and consequently tax payers funds were wasted in a fradulent exercise that effectively amounts to serious economic crime. Secondly these same unscrupulous foreigners decided to lead Kenyans on a wild goose chase as they disemminated all types of falsehoods through the media including full page advertisements advertising jobs using a false P.O. Box. If you care to verify the corrupt foreigners claimed in one advertisement that they had a running phone network in New Zealand. These are all fabricated falsehoods as the matter has indeed been brought up in the New Zealand parliament as well. Kenyans should stay clear of such dubious foreigners who have no good intentions for Kenyans at large except for themselves. If you care to verify please visit the GPO and ask if P.O. Box 745742 as advertised on numerous occassions in the dailies exists or similarly mail in an application with your return address clearly indicated. Similarly you may choose to visit New Zealand and seek a line on the purported network or just as easily obtain records from the company office there of filings made by these foreigners in regards to the state of their audited books which point at eminent collapse of their operation there. Fact 2 : The full licence fee remains unpaid. In that case one then wonders what happened to the so called lined up funding. On 9/21/05, Brian Longwe <cto@nbi.ispkenya.com> wrote:
For everyone's information very few companies when applying for a license have the money "in the bank" - most of the time they have lined up the funding which is triggered when the license is awarded.
On the question of turnover does anyone here want to claim that Kenya's cooperatives have less than 7 billion shillings of turnover?
I'm not taking sides here, just asking questions that I think should straighten what is clearly spurios reasoning...
Brian
On 21 Sep 2005, at 16:06, <alice@apc.org> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: <alice@apc.org> To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl@lyris.idrc.ca> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:51 PM Subject: Fw: [DigAfrica] How broke company won tender
This is scandalous! more so as consumers continue to suffer the consequences of a duopoly.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
How broke company won tender
By Gordon Opiyo
Details of how companies that were in the red won the country's third mobile license have been exposed.
Initial investigations by the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission into the award of the license in 2003 show that two of the major shareholders in consortium were had financial difficulties at the time of the award.
The investigations could expose what could be one of the country's biggest public tendering scandals.
At the same time, court documents from the South African High Court have shed more light into intricacies that led to the controversial award.
Audited accounts of Econet Wireless International made available to `The Sunday Standard' show that the company's financial state was so bad in 2003 that they could not qualify for an overdraft from any international bank.
Sources at the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission say investigators were startled at the state of accounts of the two main shareholders.
The winning consortium consisted of Kenya National Federation of Co- operatives 81 per cent, Econet Wireless International 10 per cent, Rapsel and Corporate Africa each with 4.5 per cent.
The Communications Commission of Kenya required members of the consortium to have a minimum turn over of $100 million (Sh7.5 billion).
"Econet's and Kenya National Federation of Co-operatives' records could not pass any basic stage even in low capital expenditure projects," says a senior investigator at the anti- graft body.
The turn over of Econet Wireless International in that year was $8 million that of Econet Satellite Services was $9 million, while Econet Wireless New Zealand, was in deficit. Thus the total turnover of companies that qualified for the Econet bid was less than $20 million.
With the other partners not being financially stable, the consortium fell short of the minimum financial requirements by well over $80 million.
Accounts audited by the London-based Deloitte & Touche LLP paint a gloomy picture of the state of affairs at Econet Wireless International.
In one of the reports, auditors declare that Econet Wireless Limited, Company Registration No. 4149948, in the year ended June 30, 2003, urgently needed a cash injection.
The auditors say: "Each of the Group's (Econet's) Investment requires additional financing in the short term in order to develop their businesses which could then support the carrying values of these investments in the group's balance sheet.
The ability of these investment businesses to raise further financing is not known with any reasonable degree of certainty at this time. "
The auditors also declare the Econet group could not acquire overdraft facilities at the time it acquired Kenya's third GSM license.
The auditors declare: "The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, however, the company is in the process of obtaining further funds to finance ongoing day to day operations and to finance future capital expenditure."
The report continues: " In this respect the directors are aware that they do not have overdraft facilities and there is an immediate and ongoing need to raise cash to fund day to day operations of the company and group and to finance the construction of the New Zealand Telecommunications network." On June 28, Co-operatives Development minister Njeru Ndwiga shocked the nation when he announced that the group that had acquired the 81 per cent stake in the third mobile company was bankrupt.
Ndwiga announced KNFC was indebted to the tune of Sh40 million against an asset base of Sh25 million.
Ndwiga said the cash-strapped organisation was unable to honuor basic financial obligations such as its Sh1.3 million monthly wage bill, repayment of a Sh10 million loan from the Cooperative Bank, Sh5.6 million in statutory deductions and Sh800, 000 in legal fees.
The minister said that the printing press worth Sh20 million was vandalised. Ndwiga's revelation came months after The Sunday Standard exclusively reported that the company was unable to honour its obligations in the mobile phone company.
As a result, the minister banned all officials of KNFC from holding any position within the co-operative sector.
The other shareholder, Manga Mugwe of Rapsel Limited had a dispute with Kenya Commercial Bank over a loan.
More details of the financial state of Econet Wireless International came into the public domain in June this year at the South African High Court. Econet had taken its former finance director, Mwaura Njiri, to court; accusing him of using confidential information he got during his tenure to hurt the company.
In the case number 05/12059 that was heard at the Witwatersrand Local Division, Mwaura defended himself against the allegations. In a sworn affidavit explaining how funds for the license fee were raised, Mwaura says, "The first applicant's (Econet Wireless International Limited) balance sheet at that time was so bad that it (Econet) was unable to obtain funds from any bank.
The First applicant in fact had been unable to raise the required amount of $27 million ."
Mwaura, during whose tenure Econet bid for the license says the company managed to get funding as a result of his personal commitment.
As Econet drags its feet on its roll out plan, the two existing mobile companies continue making huge profits as the public pays heavily for their services.
source : http://www.eastandard.net/hm_news/news.php?articleid=29062
Dig Africa site welcomes you to join us at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/Digafrica
Also if you are interested to join a Swahili/English discussion group click http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/kiswahili
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "DigAfrica" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DigAfrica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/DKgolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Dig Africa site welcomes you to join us at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/Digafrica
Also if you are interested to join a Swahili/English discussion group click http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/kiswahili
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigAfrica/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DigAfrica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
participants (4)
-
alice＠apc.org -
Brian Longwe -
Florence Etta -
mike theuri