Kenya to rival Nigeria in local content production
Bwana Walubengo has written a good piece on local content and it's regulation in his popular Op-ed pasted below. For avoidance of doubt Walu, I've included here the definition of Local content as laid out in statute. Its very clear from the regulator's perspective on WHAT local content is. Another issue you raise is the quality of local content. Well, my answer would be, let us try and try and try until we get it right. Nollywood grew from not giving up. KENYA INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (BROADCASTING) REGULATIONS, 2009 “local content” means the total of all television or radio programmes which fulfil any five of the following conditions— (a) the production is made in either Kenya’s native languages or official languages of Kenya; (b) production was done in Kenya; (c) the content deals with issues that are unique and relevant to Kenyan audiences; (d) at least twenty per centum of the share of the production company are owned by Kenyans; (e) a majority of the artistes are Kenyans; (f) the location of shooting, in case of audiovisual programmes or performance was in Kenya; (g) the author thereof must be a Kenyan national and in case of co-authorship or multi-authorship fifty per centum or more of the authors must be Kenyan; (h) the production is made under Kenyan creative and technical control, but does not include news and commentaries; 35. Local content (1) The Commission may require a licensee to commit the minimum amount of time, as maybe specified in the licence, to broadcast of local content or as may be prescribed from time to time by the Commission by notice in the Gazette: Provided that where a broadcaster is, unable to comply with the foregoing, the Commission shall require such broadcaster to pay such an amount of money, as may be prescribed by the Commission into the Fund. (2) The Commission shall from time to time prescribe a minimum local content quota for foreign broadcasting stations that broadcast in Kenya. Kenya Information and Communications Act, 1998 “Kenyan programme” means sounds or vision or a combination of both whose content comply with the classification of local content as may be required by the Commission from time to time. 46K. Regulations on broadcasting The Minister may, in consultation with the Commission, make regulations generally with respect to all broadcasting services and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, with respect to— (a) the facilitation, promotion and maintenance of diversity and plurality of views for a competitive marketplace of ideas; (b) financing and broadcast of local content; (c) mandating the carriage of content, in keeping with public interest obligations, across licensed broadcasting services; (d) prescribing anything that may be prescribed under this Part. http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2890270/-/y4ede4... Recently the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) announced that broadcasters would be required to allocate 40 per cent <http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/CA-demands-60pc-local-TV-content-within-four-years/-/539550/2782078/-/w76jn8/-/index.html> of their programming to local content. This is just the beginning. Within four years, the broadcasters are expected to scale this up to 60 per cent. What this means, essentially, is that local radio and television stations must find local content to fill up the space, currently dominated by Mexican soap operas on TV and foreign music on radio, across their 24-hour programming. There are two views regarding whether this is a good or bad idea.
From a government perspective, the push for regulation is meant to force media owners to invest in local production, rather than opt for the easier, cheaper option of buying third-rate soap operas from Mexico.
In order to meet the 40 per cent local content quota, there must be significant production of local movies, documentaries, music and interviews among others, yet the ecosystem to support local production is not as cheap as most people would imagine. *HEAVY INVESTMENTS* For example, producing a movie requires heavy investments in both equipment and technical expertise, ranging from scriptwriters, actors and stage designers to editors, producers and distributors, among others. Furthermore, a 30-minute production may actually take three weeks to put together. Now think about producing such a series, once per week, four times per month and forty-eight times per year, and you will realise why most local stations may avoid sustaining local productions. It’s obviously cheaper to buy Mexican soap operas and fill up our airwaves rather than invest in local production. What the government is saying here is that cheap is eventually expensive, in terms of lost opportunities to fruitfully engage the youth within the creative industry. The alternative view to the local content policy is that current productions are of such poor quality that they would not merit any airtime. Furthermore, forcing stations to broadcast 60 per cent local content contravenes the liberal nature of our broadcast industry. Broadcasters want the liberty to choose what content to serve their consumers. *WHAT'S LOCAL CONTENT?* If consumers prefer Mexican soaps, so be it — after all it's their taste, their choice. No one should therefore purport to dictate what is good for the consumer by subjecting them to the so-called local content quotas. Besides, what exactly is local content? Would a film such as *The Lion King*, with its African theme, or *Out of Africa,* with its Kenyan theme constitute local content? What of the movie *12 Years A Slave*, in which our very own Lupita Nyong’o played a leading role? What about those documentaries on Kenyan wildlife that dominate NatGeo Wild on satellite TV? Do all these films qualify as local content despite their overwhelmingly foreign production? How are we going to determine what is local content, in other words? Will the decision be based on the theme, the script, the cast, the location, the production crew or mixture of all of the above? *MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS* Whatever the case, how will we stop Kenyans from simply switching channels — away from the local broadcasters whose content maybe deemed too local — and subsequently continuing to watch their preferred foreign content on other channels? This might effectively mean local stations will lose "eyeballs" and the associated advertisement revenue to the foreign competition, which in turn may mean we are losing rather than creating local jobs within the creative industry. Clearly, there are more questions than answers in the local content debate. However, one must remember that you can come up with local content without necessarily creating local jobs. The government and regulators must therefore think through the local content policy in order to ensure the job creation intended is actually achieved rather than frustrated. *Mr Walubengo is a lecturer at the Multimedia University of Kenya's Faculty of Computing and IT. Twitter:@jwalu <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#> email: jwalubengo@mmu.ac.ke <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#>* ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya "There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
The government is Dog-fooding the Media industry in my opinion. If they cant produce local content then whats their purpose? Just regurgitate whatever foreign media produces? I think its a good idea but seems too targeted to one industry. I still don't understand why we allow Mtumba clothes, Chinese furniture and more relevantly foreign software to dominate our market. For the Local content the money will create the skill-set and attract the right people in. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Bwana Walubengo has written a good piece on local content and it's regulation in his popular Op-ed pasted below.
For avoidance of doubt Walu, I've included here the definition of Local content as laid out in statute. Its very clear from the regulator's perspective on WHAT local content is. Another issue you raise is the quality of local content. Well, my answer would be, let us try and try and try until we get it right. Nollywood grew from not giving up.
KENYA INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (BROADCASTING) REGULATIONS, 2009 “local content” means the total of all television or radio programmes which fulfil any five of the following conditions— (a) the production is made in either Kenya’s native languages or official languages of Kenya; (b) production was done in Kenya; (c) the content deals with issues that are unique and relevant to Kenyan audiences; (d) at least twenty per centum of the share of the production company are owned by Kenyans; (e) a majority of the artistes are Kenyans; (f) the location of shooting, in case of audiovisual programmes or performance was in Kenya; (g) the author thereof must be a Kenyan national and in case of co-authorship or multi-authorship fifty per centum or more of the authors must be Kenyan; (h) the production is made under Kenyan creative and technical control, but does not include news and commentaries;
35. Local content (1) The Commission may require a licensee to commit the minimum amount of time, as maybe specified in the licence, to broadcast of local content or as may be prescribed from time to time by the Commission by notice in the Gazette: Provided that where a broadcaster is, unable to comply with the foregoing, the Commission shall require such broadcaster to pay such an amount of money, as may be prescribed by the Commission into the Fund. (2) The Commission shall from time to time prescribe a minimum local content quota for foreign broadcasting stations that broadcast in Kenya.
Kenya Information and Communications Act, 1998
“Kenyan programme” means sounds or vision or a combination of both whose content comply with the classification of local content as may be required by the Commission from time to time.
46K. Regulations on broadcasting The Minister may, in consultation with the Commission, make regulations generally with respect to all broadcasting services and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, with respect to— (a) the facilitation, promotion and maintenance of diversity and plurality of views for a competitive marketplace of ideas; (b) financing and broadcast of local content; (c) mandating the carriage of content, in keeping with public interest obligations, across licensed broadcasting services; (d) prescribing anything that may be prescribed under this Part.
http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2890270/-/y4ede4...
Recently the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) announced that broadcasters would be required to allocate 40 per cent <http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/CA-demands-60pc-local-TV-content-within-four-years/-/539550/2782078/-/w76jn8/-/index.html> of their programming to local content.
This is just the beginning. Within four years, the broadcasters are expected to scale this up to 60 per cent.
What this means, essentially, is that local radio and television stations must find local content to fill up the space, currently dominated by Mexican soap operas on TV and foreign music on radio, across their 24-hour programming.
There are two views regarding whether this is a good or bad idea.
From a government perspective, the push for regulation is meant to force media owners to invest in local production, rather than opt for the easier, cheaper option of buying third-rate soap operas from Mexico.
In order to meet the 40 per cent local content quota, there must be significant production of local movies, documentaries, music and interviews among others, yet the ecosystem to support local production is not as cheap as most people would imagine.
*HEAVY INVESTMENTS*
For example, producing a movie requires heavy investments in both equipment and technical expertise, ranging from scriptwriters, actors and stage designers to editors, producers and distributors, among others.
Furthermore, a 30-minute production may actually take three weeks to put together. Now think about producing such a series, once per week, four times per month and forty-eight times per year, and you will realise why most local stations may avoid sustaining local productions.
It’s obviously cheaper to buy Mexican soap operas and fill up our airwaves rather than invest in local production. What the government is saying here is that cheap is eventually expensive, in terms of lost opportunities to fruitfully engage the youth within the creative industry.
The alternative view to the local content policy is that current productions are of such poor quality that they would not merit any airtime.
Furthermore, forcing stations to broadcast 60 per cent local content contravenes the liberal nature of our broadcast industry.
Broadcasters want the liberty to choose what content to serve their consumers.
*WHAT'S LOCAL CONTENT?*
If consumers prefer Mexican soaps, so be it — after all it's their taste, their choice.
No one should therefore purport to dictate what is good for the consumer by subjecting them to the so-called local content quotas. Besides, what exactly is local content?
Would a film such as *The Lion King*, with its African theme, or *Out of Africa,* with its Kenyan theme constitute local content?
What of the movie *12 Years A Slave*, in which our very own Lupita Nyong’o played a leading role?
What about those documentaries on Kenyan wildlife that dominate NatGeo Wild on satellite TV? Do all these films qualify as local content despite their overwhelmingly foreign production?
How are we going to determine what is local content, in other words? Will the decision be based on the theme, the script, the cast, the location, the production crew or mixture of all of the above?
*MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS*
Whatever the case, how will we stop Kenyans from simply switching channels — away from the local broadcasters whose content maybe deemed too local — and subsequently continuing to watch their preferred foreign content on other channels?
This might effectively mean local stations will lose "eyeballs" and the associated advertisement revenue to the foreign competition, which in turn may mean we are losing rather than creating local jobs within the creative industry.
Clearly, there are more questions than answers in the local content debate. However, one must remember that you can come up with local content without necessarily creating local jobs.
The government and regulators must therefore think through the local content policy in order to ensure the job creation intended is actually achieved rather than frustrated.
*Mr Walubengo is a lecturer at the Multimedia University of Kenya's Faculty of Computing and IT. Twitter:@jwalu <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#> email: jwalubengo@mmu.ac.ke <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#>* ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards, Mark Mwangi markmwangi.me.ke
Mark, good points. It starts with one industry, then grows, and grows, and grows to other sectors. At least thr Ministry of ICT and Communications Authority led in this. Other Ministries can borrow a leaf too. Regards On Sep 30, 2015 5:57 PM, "Mark Mwangi" <mwangy@gmail.com> wrote:
The government is Dog-fooding the Media industry in my opinion. If they cant produce local content then whats their purpose? Just regurgitate whatever foreign media produces?
I think its a good idea but seems too targeted to one industry.
I still don't understand why we allow Mtumba clothes, Chinese furniture and more relevantly foreign software to dominate our market.
For the Local content the money will create the skill-set and attract the right people in.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Bwana Walubengo has written a good piece on local content and it's regulation in his popular Op-ed pasted below.
For avoidance of doubt Walu, I've included here the definition of Local content as laid out in statute. Its very clear from the regulator's perspective on WHAT local content is. Another issue you raise is the quality of local content. Well, my answer would be, let us try and try and try until we get it right. Nollywood grew from not giving up.
KENYA INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (BROADCASTING) REGULATIONS, 2009 “local content” means the total of all television or radio programmes which fulfil any five of the following conditions— (a) the production is made in either Kenya’s native languages or official languages of Kenya; (b) production was done in Kenya; (c) the content deals with issues that are unique and relevant to Kenyan audiences; (d) at least twenty per centum of the share of the production company are owned by Kenyans; (e) a majority of the artistes are Kenyans; (f) the location of shooting, in case of audiovisual programmes or performance was in Kenya; (g) the author thereof must be a Kenyan national and in case of co-authorship or multi-authorship fifty per centum or more of the authors must be Kenyan; (h) the production is made under Kenyan creative and technical control, but does not include news and commentaries;
35. Local content (1) The Commission may require a licensee to commit the minimum amount of time, as maybe specified in the licence, to broadcast of local content or as may be prescribed from time to time by the Commission by notice in the Gazette: Provided that where a broadcaster is, unable to comply with the foregoing, the Commission shall require such broadcaster to pay such an amount of money, as may be prescribed by the Commission into the Fund. (2) The Commission shall from time to time prescribe a minimum local content quota for foreign broadcasting stations that broadcast in Kenya.
Kenya Information and Communications Act, 1998
“Kenyan programme” means sounds or vision or a combination of both whose content comply with the classification of local content as may be required by the Commission from time to time.
46K. Regulations on broadcasting The Minister may, in consultation with the Commission, make regulations generally with respect to all broadcasting services and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, with respect to— (a) the facilitation, promotion and maintenance of diversity and plurality of views for a competitive marketplace of ideas; (b) financing and broadcast of local content; (c) mandating the carriage of content, in keeping with public interest obligations, across licensed broadcasting services; (d) prescribing anything that may be prescribed under this Part.
http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2890270/-/y4ede4...
Recently the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) announced that broadcasters would be required to allocate 40 per cent <http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/CA-demands-60pc-local-TV-content-within-four-years/-/539550/2782078/-/w76jn8/-/index.html> of their programming to local content.
This is just the beginning. Within four years, the broadcasters are expected to scale this up to 60 per cent.
What this means, essentially, is that local radio and television stations must find local content to fill up the space, currently dominated by Mexican soap operas on TV and foreign music on radio, across their 24-hour programming.
There are two views regarding whether this is a good or bad idea.
From a government perspective, the push for regulation is meant to force media owners to invest in local production, rather than opt for the easier, cheaper option of buying third-rate soap operas from Mexico.
In order to meet the 40 per cent local content quota, there must be significant production of local movies, documentaries, music and interviews among others, yet the ecosystem to support local production is not as cheap as most people would imagine.
*HEAVY INVESTMENTS*
For example, producing a movie requires heavy investments in both equipment and technical expertise, ranging from scriptwriters, actors and stage designers to editors, producers and distributors, among others.
Furthermore, a 30-minute production may actually take three weeks to put together. Now think about producing such a series, once per week, four times per month and forty-eight times per year, and you will realise why most local stations may avoid sustaining local productions.
It’s obviously cheaper to buy Mexican soap operas and fill up our airwaves rather than invest in local production. What the government is saying here is that cheap is eventually expensive, in terms of lost opportunities to fruitfully engage the youth within the creative industry.
The alternative view to the local content policy is that current productions are of such poor quality that they would not merit any airtime.
Furthermore, forcing stations to broadcast 60 per cent local content contravenes the liberal nature of our broadcast industry.
Broadcasters want the liberty to choose what content to serve their consumers.
*WHAT'S LOCAL CONTENT?*
If consumers prefer Mexican soaps, so be it — after all it's their taste, their choice.
No one should therefore purport to dictate what is good for the consumer by subjecting them to the so-called local content quotas. Besides, what exactly is local content?
Would a film such as *The Lion King*, with its African theme, or *Out of Africa,* with its Kenyan theme constitute local content?
What of the movie *12 Years A Slave*, in which our very own Lupita Nyong’o played a leading role?
What about those documentaries on Kenyan wildlife that dominate NatGeo Wild on satellite TV? Do all these films qualify as local content despite their overwhelmingly foreign production?
How are we going to determine what is local content, in other words? Will the decision be based on the theme, the script, the cast, the location, the production crew or mixture of all of the above?
*MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS*
Whatever the case, how will we stop Kenyans from simply switching channels — away from the local broadcasters whose content maybe deemed too local — and subsequently continuing to watch their preferred foreign content on other channels?
This might effectively mean local stations will lose "eyeballs" and the associated advertisement revenue to the foreign competition, which in turn may mean we are losing rather than creating local jobs within the creative industry.
Clearly, there are more questions than answers in the local content debate. However, one must remember that you can come up with local content without necessarily creating local jobs.
The government and regulators must therefore think through the local content policy in order to ensure the job creation intended is actually achieved rather than frustrated.
*Mr Walubengo is a lecturer at the Multimedia University of Kenya's Faculty of Computing and IT. Twitter:@jwalu <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#> email: jwalubengo@mmu.ac.ke <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#>* ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards,
Mark Mwangi
markmwangi.me.ke
I'm not sure why we feel we need to restrict one sector for another sector to develop. I doubt Nigerian's movie sector grew because Nigerians were told they must watch Nigerian movies 40% of the time. We are already in a place where young consumers main form of entertainment is Ksh. 50 DVDs, which most of the time, carry Hollywood series. Additionally, some have started carrying whole series in their memory cards and watching these on their phones. We can therefore not assume that a government directive will make people watch local content. We did not need a directive saying that 40% of banking must be done in local banks for the likes of KCB and Equity to start competing with Barclays and StanChart. What we need is are incentives for local production - in the lines of taxes, licensing etc. We have a lot of barriers towards doing business in Kenya. You have to pay a lot of people, get harassed by a lot of people, before your first product is out. We have made in Kenya motorbikes, which cost KSh. 400,000 competing with imported ones costing KSh. 100,000. Of course, the impact of a Ksh. 100,000 is higher (more people can afford this and use them to do other things). Hence, a solution here would not be banning the Ksh. 100,000 imported bike, but looking at what can we do to help the Kenyan motorbike get to this price level. If it weren't for our policies, BRCK would be doing their manufacturing in Kenya. There is the argument that we need taxes for development, but I think we are putting the cart before the horse. We can forego high taxation now, and grow the economy, and have an increased tax base. We should be careful of arguments that encourage policy that favours one sector, or certain businesses over others, rather than an overall conducive business environment. After all, consumers come from all sectors, and if their income is suppressed, there's really so much that you can make from them. On Wednesday, 30 September 2015, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Mark, good points. It starts with one industry, then grows, and grows, and grows to other sectors. At least thr Ministry of ICT and Communications Authority led in this. Other Ministries can borrow a leaf too.
Regards On Sep 30, 2015 5:57 PM, "Mark Mwangi" <mwangy@gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mwangy@gmail.com');>> wrote:
The government is Dog-fooding the Media industry in my opinion. If they cant produce local content then whats their purpose? Just regurgitate whatever foreign media produces?
I think its a good idea but seems too targeted to one industry.
I still don't understand why we allow Mtumba clothes, Chinese furniture and more relevantly foreign software to dominate our market.
For the Local content the money will create the skill-set and attract the right people in.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke');>> wrote:
Bwana Walubengo has written a good piece on local content and it's regulation in his popular Op-ed pasted below.
For avoidance of doubt Walu, I've included here the definition of Local content as laid out in statute. Its very clear from the regulator's perspective on WHAT local content is. Another issue you raise is the quality of local content. Well, my answer would be, let us try and try and try until we get it right. Nollywood grew from not giving up.
KENYA INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (BROADCASTING) REGULATIONS, 2009 “local content” means the total of all television or radio programmes which fulfil any five of the following conditions— (a) the production is made in either Kenya’s native languages or official languages of Kenya; (b) production was done in Kenya; (c) the content deals with issues that are unique and relevant to Kenyan audiences; (d) at least twenty per centum of the share of the production company are owned by Kenyans; (e) a majority of the artistes are Kenyans; (f) the location of shooting, in case of audiovisual programmes or performance was in Kenya; (g) the author thereof must be a Kenyan national and in case of co-authorship or multi-authorship fifty per centum or more of the authors must be Kenyan; (h) the production is made under Kenyan creative and technical control, but does not include news and commentaries;
35. Local content (1) The Commission may require a licensee to commit the minimum amount of time, as maybe specified in the licence, to broadcast of local content or as may be prescribed from time to time by the Commission by notice in the Gazette: Provided that where a broadcaster is, unable to comply with the foregoing, the Commission shall require such broadcaster to pay such an amount of money, as may be prescribed by the Commission into the Fund. (2) The Commission shall from time to time prescribe a minimum local content quota for foreign broadcasting stations that broadcast in Kenya.
Kenya Information and Communications Act, 1998
“Kenyan programme” means sounds or vision or a combination of both whose content comply with the classification of local content as may be required by the Commission from time to time.
46K. Regulations on broadcasting The Minister may, in consultation with the Commission, make regulations generally with respect to all broadcasting services and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, with respect to— (a) the facilitation, promotion and maintenance of diversity and plurality of views for a competitive marketplace of ideas; (b) financing and broadcast of local content; (c) mandating the carriage of content, in keeping with public interest obligations, across licensed broadcasting services; (d) prescribing anything that may be prescribed under this Part.
http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2890270/-/y4ede4...
Recently the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) announced that broadcasters would be required to allocate 40 per cent <http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/CA-demands-60pc-local-TV-content-within-four-years/-/539550/2782078/-/w76jn8/-/index.html> of their programming to local content.
This is just the beginning. Within four years, the broadcasters are expected to scale this up to 60 per cent.
What this means, essentially, is that local radio and television stations must find local content to fill up the space, currently dominated by Mexican soap operas on TV and foreign music on radio, across their 24-hour programming.
There are two views regarding whether this is a good or bad idea.
From a government perspective, the push for regulation is meant to force media owners to invest in local production, rather than opt for the easier, cheaper option of buying third-rate soap operas from Mexico.
In order to meet the 40 per cent local content quota, there must be significant production of local movies, documentaries, music and interviews among others, yet the ecosystem to support local production is not as cheap as most people would imagine.
*HEAVY INVESTMENTS*
For example, producing a movie requires heavy investments in both equipment and technical expertise, ranging from scriptwriters, actors and stage designers to editors, producers and distributors, among others.
Furthermore, a 30-minute production may actually take three weeks to put together. Now think about producing such a series, once per week, four times per month and forty-eight times per year, and you will realise why most local stations may avoid sustaining local productions.
It’s obviously cheaper to buy Mexican soap operas and fill up our airwaves rather than invest in local production. What the government is saying here is that cheap is eventually expensive, in terms of lost opportunities to fruitfully engage the youth within the creative industry.
The alternative view to the local content policy is that current productions are of such poor quality that they would not merit any airtime.
Furthermore, forcing stations to broadcast 60 per cent local content contravenes the liberal nature of our broadcast industry.
Broadcasters want the liberty to choose what content to serve their consumers.
*WHAT'S LOCAL CONTENT?*
If consumers prefer Mexican soaps, so be it — after all it's their taste, their choice.
No one should therefore purport to dictate what is good for the consumer by subjecting them to the so-called local content quotas. Besides, what exactly is local content?
Would a film such as *The Lion King*, with its African theme, or *Out of Africa,* with its Kenyan theme constitute local content?
What of the movie *12 Years A Slave*, in which our very own Lupita Nyong’o played a leading role?
What about those documentaries on Kenyan wildlife that dominate NatGeo Wild on satellite TV? Do all these films qualify as local content despite their overwhelmingly foreign production?
How are we going to determine what is local content, in other words? Will the decision be based on the theme, the script, the cast, the location, the production crew or mixture of all of the above?
*MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS*
Whatever the case, how will we stop Kenyans from simply switching channels — away from the local broadcasters whose content maybe deemed too local — and subsequently continuing to watch their preferred foreign content on other channels?
This might effectively mean local stations will lose "eyeballs" and the associated advertisement revenue to the foreign competition, which in turn may mean we are losing rather than creating local jobs within the creative industry.
Clearly, there are more questions than answers in the local content debate. However, one must remember that you can come up with local content without necessarily creating local jobs.
The government and regulators must therefore think through the local content policy in order to ensure the job creation intended is actually achieved rather than frustrated.
*Mr Walubengo is a lecturer at the Multimedia University of Kenya's Faculty of Computing and IT. Twitter:@jwalu <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#> email: jwalubengo@mmu.ac.ke <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#>* ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke');> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards,
Mark Mwangi
markmwangi.me.ke
-- with Regards: blog.denniskioko.com <http://www.denniskioko.com/>
Dennis, Very true. I will swallow my words. Even Japan Imports cars and Germany imports Precision tools. Creating a walled Garden is not good state wise. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Dennis Kioko via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
I'm not sure why we feel we need to restrict one sector for another sector to develop. I doubt Nigerian's movie sector grew because Nigerians were told they must watch Nigerian movies 40% of the time.
We are already in a place where young consumers main form of entertainment is Ksh. 50 DVDs, which most of the time, carry Hollywood series. Additionally, some have started carrying whole series in their memory cards and watching these on their phones. We can therefore not assume that a government directive will make people watch local content.
We did not need a directive saying that 40% of banking must be done in local banks for the likes of KCB and Equity to start competing with Barclays and StanChart.
What we need is are incentives for local production - in the lines of taxes, licensing etc. We have a lot of barriers towards doing business in Kenya. You have to pay a lot of people, get harassed by a lot of people, before your first product is out.
We have made in Kenya motorbikes, which cost KSh. 400,000 competing with imported ones costing KSh. 100,000. Of course, the impact of a Ksh. 100,000 is higher (more people can afford this and use them to do other things). Hence, a solution here would not be banning the Ksh. 100,000 imported bike, but looking at what can we do to help the Kenyan motorbike get to this price level.
If it weren't for our policies, BRCK would be doing their manufacturing in Kenya.
There is the argument that we need taxes for development, but I think we are putting the cart before the horse. We can forego high taxation now, and grow the economy, and have an increased tax base.
We should be careful of arguments that encourage policy that favours one sector, or certain businesses over others, rather than an overall conducive business environment. After all, consumers come from all sectors, and if their income is suppressed, there's really so much that you can make from them.
On Wednesday, 30 September 2015, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Mark, good points. It starts with one industry, then grows, and grows, and grows to other sectors. At least thr Ministry of ICT and Communications Authority led in this. Other Ministries can borrow a leaf too.
Regards On Sep 30, 2015 5:57 PM, "Mark Mwangi" <mwangy@gmail.com> wrote:
The government is Dog-fooding the Media industry in my opinion. If they cant produce local content then whats their purpose? Just regurgitate whatever foreign media produces?
I think its a good idea but seems too targeted to one industry.
I still don't understand why we allow Mtumba clothes, Chinese furniture and more relevantly foreign software to dominate our market.
For the Local content the money will create the skill-set and attract the right people in.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Bwana Walubengo has written a good piece on local content and it's regulation in his popular Op-ed pasted below.
For avoidance of doubt Walu, I've included here the definition of Local content as laid out in statute. Its very clear from the regulator's perspective on WHAT local content is. Another issue you raise is the quality of local content. Well, my answer would be, let us try and try and try until we get it right. Nollywood grew from not giving up.
KENYA INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (BROADCASTING) REGULATIONS, 2009 “local content” means the total of all television or radio programmes which fulfil any five of the following conditions— (a) the production is made in either Kenya’s native languages or official languages of Kenya; (b) production was done in Kenya; (c) the content deals with issues that are unique and relevant to Kenyan audiences; (d) at least twenty per centum of the share of the production company are owned by Kenyans; (e) a majority of the artistes are Kenyans; (f) the location of shooting, in case of audiovisual programmes or performance was in Kenya; (g) the author thereof must be a Kenyan national and in case of co-authorship or multi-authorship fifty per centum or more of the authors must be Kenyan; (h) the production is made under Kenyan creative and technical control, but does not include news and commentaries;
35. Local content (1) The Commission may require a licensee to commit the minimum amount of time, as maybe specified in the licence, to broadcast of local content or as may be prescribed from time to time by the Commission by notice in the Gazette: Provided that where a broadcaster is, unable to comply with the foregoing, the Commission shall require such broadcaster to pay such an amount of money, as may be prescribed by the Commission into the Fund. (2) The Commission shall from time to time prescribe a minimum local content quota for foreign broadcasting stations that broadcast in Kenya.
Kenya Information and Communications Act, 1998
“Kenyan programme” means sounds or vision or a combination of both whose content comply with the classification of local content as may be required by the Commission from time to time.
46K. Regulations on broadcasting The Minister may, in consultation with the Commission, make regulations generally with respect to all broadcasting services and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, with respect to— (a) the facilitation, promotion and maintenance of diversity and plurality of views for a competitive marketplace of ideas; (b) financing and broadcast of local content; (c) mandating the carriage of content, in keeping with public interest obligations, across licensed broadcasting services; (d) prescribing anything that may be prescribed under this Part.
http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2890270/-/y4ede4...
Recently the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) announced that broadcasters would be required to allocate 40 per cent <http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/CA-demands-60pc-local-TV-content-within-four-years/-/539550/2782078/-/w76jn8/-/index.html> of their programming to local content.
This is just the beginning. Within four years, the broadcasters are expected to scale this up to 60 per cent.
What this means, essentially, is that local radio and television stations must find local content to fill up the space, currently dominated by Mexican soap operas on TV and foreign music on radio, across their 24-hour programming.
There are two views regarding whether this is a good or bad idea.
From a government perspective, the push for regulation is meant to force media owners to invest in local production, rather than opt for the easier, cheaper option of buying third-rate soap operas from Mexico.
In order to meet the 40 per cent local content quota, there must be significant production of local movies, documentaries, music and interviews among others, yet the ecosystem to support local production is not as cheap as most people would imagine.
*HEAVY INVESTMENTS*
For example, producing a movie requires heavy investments in both equipment and technical expertise, ranging from scriptwriters, actors and stage designers to editors, producers and distributors, among others.
Furthermore, a 30-minute production may actually take three weeks to put together. Now think about producing such a series, once per week, four times per month and forty-eight times per year, and you will realise why most local stations may avoid sustaining local productions.
It’s obviously cheaper to buy Mexican soap operas and fill up our airwaves rather than invest in local production. What the government is saying here is that cheap is eventually expensive, in terms of lost opportunities to fruitfully engage the youth within the creative industry.
The alternative view to the local content policy is that current productions are of such poor quality that they would not merit any airtime.
Furthermore, forcing stations to broadcast 60 per cent local content contravenes the liberal nature of our broadcast industry.
Broadcasters want the liberty to choose what content to serve their consumers.
*WHAT'S LOCAL CONTENT?*
If consumers prefer Mexican soaps, so be it — after all it's their taste, their choice.
No one should therefore purport to dictate what is good for the consumer by subjecting them to the so-called local content quotas. Besides, what exactly is local content?
Would a film such as *The Lion King*, with its African theme, or *Out of Africa,* with its Kenyan theme constitute local content?
What of the movie *12 Years A Slave*, in which our very own Lupita Nyong’o played a leading role?
What about those documentaries on Kenyan wildlife that dominate NatGeo Wild on satellite TV? Do all these films qualify as local content despite their overwhelmingly foreign production?
How are we going to determine what is local content, in other words? Will the decision be based on the theme, the script, the cast, the location, the production crew or mixture of all of the above?
*MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS*
Whatever the case, how will we stop Kenyans from simply switching channels — away from the local broadcasters whose content maybe deemed too local — and subsequently continuing to watch their preferred foreign content on other channels?
This might effectively mean local stations will lose "eyeballs" and the associated advertisement revenue to the foreign competition, which in turn may mean we are losing rather than creating local jobs within the creative industry.
Clearly, there are more questions than answers in the local content debate. However, one must remember that you can come up with local content without necessarily creating local jobs.
The government and regulators must therefore think through the local content policy in order to ensure the job creation intended is actually achieved rather than frustrated.
*Mr Walubengo is a lecturer at the Multimedia University of Kenya's Faculty of Computing and IT. Twitter:@jwalu <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#> email: jwalubengo@mmu.ac.ke <http://196.6.203.2:8010/studio/#>* ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards,
Mark Mwangi
markmwangi.me.ke
-- with Regards:
blog.denniskioko.com <http://www.denniskioko.com/>
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards, Mark Mwangi markmwangi.me.ke
participants (3)
-
Dennis Kioko -
Mark Mwangi -
Mwendwa Kivuva