[Fwd: ICANN Nairobi; relocation, relocation?]

14 Feb 2010

      http://crookedtimber.org/2010/02/12/14645/

ICANN Nairobi; relocation, relocation?

by Maria on February 12, 2010

Although I no longer work for ICANN, I’d planned on attending its 
meeting in Nairobi <http://nbo.icann.org/> next month to meet old 
friends and drum up some work for my new consulting business. The 
Nairobi meeting is scheduled to run from 7-12 March. The biggest issue 
on the table is a crucial stage in the addition of new top level 
domains; the vote by the Board on how to handle expressions of interest. 
But in the last 24 hours, ICANN’s COO, Doug Brent, has published a 
security warning 
<http://nbo.icann.org/meetings/security-information-11feb10-en.htm> that 
may result in the meeting being cancelled.

If this happens, it will be a real blow for the Kenyan Internet 
community. A previously planned meeting in Nairobi was cancelled because 
of security concerns prompted by election violence a couple of years 
ago. I thought this was the wrong call at the time, as election violence 
tends to die down and our meeting wasn’t till several months later. But 
I didn’t question and don’t envy the people who have to make that decision.

An ICANN meeting brings about 1200 people from around the world to a 
country chosen from host applications about a year in advance. It’s a 
mix between a trade show and a party conference, with endless parallel 
sessions, soap-boxing, hallway deal-making and late night drinking. 
Probably two thirds One third (thanks, Kieren 
<http://public.icann.org/meeting-participation-data>) of the 
participants are regulars, and there’s always a ‘back to school’ feeling 
on the first day as you greet people you’ve not seen in months with an 
enthusiasm that wears off in about a nanosecond. The dominance of the 
regulars causes ongoing criticism that the whole travelling circus 
doesn’t work to get more and different people to take part, and should 
halt its global peregrinations and stay put in L.A., Frankfurt or Singapore.

It’s expensive to take part in person, but however much resources are 
put into it, the number of remote participants is always disappointing. 
The in-person meetings have an uneasy mix of lobbyists, volunteers (many 
of whom are self-styled volunteers and in fact make their living from 
ICANN activities), beleagured staff members, G-men, NGO types, ccTLD 
reps, techies, salesmen, and confused-looking locals. Like it or loathe 
it, the travelling ICANN meeting is a big deal for the local hosts and 
the Internet community of the country and region it’s in. It’s their 
moment to come together as a group and strut their stuff on the global 
stage.

The latest security warning about Nairobi concerns a known threat, the 
possibility of a terrorist attack by Al-Shabaab, a Somalia based 
Islamist insurgency group. The group has said it will attack if Kenya 
supports the Somali Transitional Federal Government. The UK Foreign & 
Commonwealth Office put out a warning 
<http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/sub-saharan-africa/kenya1> 
in December 2009 that terrorist attacks throughout Kenya remain a high 
risk, but that only non-essential travel to near the Somali border is to 
be avoided. Like London, New York or Washington DC, Nairobi functions 
admirably despite a constant threat of terrorism. However, the US State 
Department has just issued a specific warning about possible suicide 
attacks on the Kenyatta Conference Centre where the meeting will be 
held. It says the individuals planning on carrying out attacks have been 
living in Somali communities within Kenya since early February.

Although the Board just voted a couple of weeks ago to go ahead with the 
Nairobi meeting despite the more general security concerns, the latest 
warning has re-opened this tough question. Ultimately, ICANN’s CEO and 
Chairman must weigh up the risk of bringing over a thousand people to a 
potential terrorist target. Their decision isn’t simple as that sounds. 
Chances are, no attacks will happen and the meeting will be a success. 
But I suspect the maxim ‘if we cancel it, the terrorists have already 
won’ has a lot more rhetorical than practical weight if you’re the 
person on whose conscience the safety of hundreds of people will sit.

The Nairobi meeting is hugely important to the people directly involved, 
in a way I’m finding hard to articulate. As well as the official 
programme, endless meetings and interactions will take place that are 
very important to the African and indeed the global Internet community. 
The solidarity and awareness of what it takes to keep the Internet going 
in different parts of the world grows from talking and sitting side by 
side for hours in endless technical workshops and council meetings. It 
can’t be got any other way. Or put it another way, if the meeting gets 
moved to ICANN’s home base in Los Angeles, lots of people who would have 
come won’t be able to. Not least because of visa problems. If ICANN 
Nairobi has to be cancelled, the loss in the Internet community’s 
regional momentum and global amity will be great.

Over the years, I’ve heard a lot of carping – from mostly American 
community members, I have to admit – about ICANN going to high-crime 
places like Sao Paolo, Delhi or Mexico City. In my experience, the 
non-Americans in the Internet community are markedly sanguine about 
visiting visiting poor and potentially dangerous places. When we 
cancelled Nairobi last time round, the Kenyans had to more or less 
button their anger and disappointment to stay in the game. But it’s 
infuriating to be told by people you work with that they can’t possibly 
risk themselves in a city you live in year round. However, there is a 
qualitative difference between visiting a city with a lot of crime 
against property and one where you may be a live target.

As a nonprofit with a public interest mission and a healthy contingency 
fund, relocating the meeting will hurt ICANN, but not mortally. I’m sure 
as I write that the meetings team is triggering its contingency plans to 
hold the meeting elsewhere if needed. It can be done. I just hope it 
doesn’t have to be, and that more information about the security threat 
means fore-warned is fore-armed.

Already, a couple of companies have pulled their people regardless. 
That’s their choice. But if the meeting goes ahead, I for one will be 
going to Nairobi.

--------------------------------
...
Harry, all;
This seems to be the latest update:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:47 AM,  <no-reply@icann.org> wrote:
...
Updated Security Information as of 11 February 2010
Date:
Thursday, 11 February 2010
Dear ICANN Community,
Within the last 24 hours, we received an unclassified report from the United States’ Department of State related to the Kenyatta International Conference Center, the venue for our upcoming meeting (attached below).
The types of threats outlined in that communication are difficult to assess. ICANN is now reaching out to different parties in Kenya and elsewhere to see if it is possible to better assess the situation, and of course will share any further information with you.
Sammy Buruchara, Chairman of the ICANN 2010 Local Steering Committee in Nairobi has already provided the following information:
“In relation with the Security threat by Al Shabaab to US Embassy and KICC, I wish to on behalf of ICANN 2010 Local Organizing committee and on behalf of the relevant Kenya Government Security Agencies state the following:
The Kenya Government is aware of the Security Threat by Al Shabaab on KICC and on the United States Embassy in Nairobi. Our security organs that include National Security Intelligence Service (NSIS) and Kenya Anti-Terrorism Police have been alerted and will make appropriate security responses to deal with this threat. Through their network of security agents, they have made contingency plans to thwart any possible terrorist plot that will target Nairobi City, including  KICC and all the Hotels in which delegates will be hosted, and the US Embassy.
I wish to assure ICANN Community that the Kenya Government is committed to ensure your safety during the ICANN event and will take necessary security measures to guarantee the safety of all participants during the Conference.”
In the most transparent manner possible, ICANN will continue to share information as it becomes available. Just like you, we’re processing this information, and seeing how and if we need to update procedures and plans for the upcoming meeting.
Sincerely,
ICANN
Information from U.S. State Department
“As of early February 2010, individuals affiliated with al-Shabaab al-Islamiya were planning suicide bombing attacks on the US Embassy and Kenyan International Conference Center in Nairobi, Kenya.  The individuals were targeting the KICC because it was deemed the largest and oldest building associated with the Kenyan government.  The US Embassy was targeted for its support of the Kenyan government.  As of early February, the individuals planning to carry out the attacks were living in Somali communities in Kenya.  We have no additional information regarding the possible individuals involved in the plot, timing, or method of the attack.
This is all the information we have at this time, and we will continue to keep you updated if there are any potential updates.”

alice

Harry Delano

tags

participants (2)