Re: Duopoly by Mobile Service Providers
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 08:40 +0300, John Walubengo wrote:
A 3rd Mobile Service Provider is likely to destroy un-written, cartel agreements that the current service providers are conviniently enjoying. Not necessarily - the entrance of the 3rd mobile operator in South Africa did nothing to change prices or service levels...perhaps a 4th might help:-/ mike
I have a wild idea! What do you think of it? a) Ownership (shareholding) dictates corporate agenda, local ownership locally benefits or burdens (converse is also true) b) GSM Technology is not new, where can it be purchased? c) Capital Markets Authority grants NSE a special listing for a local public GSM company. d) We buy this company's shares e) We use "our" company's network f) Current duopolies become competition receptive g) Prices come down, super profits vanish! h) Consumers are happy i) MDGs targets become clearer. Wild I guess? Regards, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Jensen" <mikejensen@eircom.net> To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl@lyris.idrc.ca> Cc: <kictanet@kictanet.or.ke> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 4:03 PM Subject: [Kictanet] Re: Duopoly by Mobile Service Providers
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 08:40 +0300, John Walubengo wrote:
A 3rd Mobile Service Provider is likely to destroy un-written, cartel agreements that the current service providers are conviniently enjoying. Not necessarily - the entrance of the 3rd mobile operator in South Africa did nothing to change prices or service levels...perhaps a 4th might help:-/ mike
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@kictanet.or.ke http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
participants (2)
-
Alex Gakuru -
Mike Jensen