Tech Spectator Syndrome ?
Please allow me to post this as a new thread... Added - My concern has been our reactions to the IEBC system failure, I applaud the doers in this country, I applaud those who bid and lost and those who won the contract to implement the system, I applaud them for their failure which means we are still alive and crawling but we will soon learn to talk and say baba and mama as the tech industry in Kenya, but my major concern is the rest of us... What I am seeing and I stand to be corrected is the spectator syndrome, when everything is ok and the international press highlight Kenya as a tech destination, Mpesa is praised, Ushahidi and startups with all our Mvitus, we celebrate, claim our team (#teamtech/ICT) is winning and write long blog posts and gazillion tweets etc This only last as long as nothing goes wrong, but when it does, suddenly the conversation changes from "we" to "them", they have failed, they dint consult, they dint test, they... not us. This is what most football fans/Spectators do, they love their football team only when its winning, which basically makes one wonder are we players or are we fans of this game? But to bring this home, we have a bigger problem, if this community started asking about the procurement process, the system architect and the companies that were selected to implement the IEBC system only after it failed, we are not engaging enough, are we saying that nobody in this list bid for this system? nobody tried? ... doesn't that mean we are just talking ..... and talk is cheap. I would like to challenge the community to engage more with an aim to problem solve, to tender and bid for local contracts, to build more open source solutions, to fundraise with an aim to seed fund startups, if we dont... we are going to be running around in circles and then move to Rwanda and guess what we will all say ..... they dint do xyz... Let ask Ourselves ... who is they? PS: I will stick to shorter posts in the future :) -- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565 Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
Really Big + 1 On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Sam Gichuru <gichuru@gmail.com> wrote:
Please allow me to post this as a new thread...
Added - My concern has been our reactions to the IEBC system failure, I applaud the doers in this country, I applaud those who bid and lost and those who won the contract to implement the system, I applaud them for their failure which means we are still alive and crawling but we will soon learn to talk and say baba and mama as the tech industry in Kenya, but my major concern is the rest of us...
What I am seeing and I stand to be corrected is the spectator syndrome, when everything is ok and the international press highlight Kenya as a tech destination, Mpesa is praised, Ushahidi and startups with all our Mvitus, we celebrate, claim our team (#teamtech/ICT) is winning and write long blog posts and gazillion tweets etc
This only last as long as nothing goes wrong, but when it does, suddenly the conversation changes from "we" to "them", they have failed, they dint consult, they dint test, they... not us. This is what most football fans/Spectators do, they love their football team only when its winning, which basically makes one wonder are we players or are we fans of this game?
But to bring this home, we have a bigger problem, if this community started asking about the procurement process, the system architect and the companies that were selected to implement the IEBC system only after it failed, we are not engaging enough, are we saying that nobody in this list bid for this system? nobody tried? ... doesn't that mean we are just talking ..... and talk is cheap.
I would like to challenge the community to engage more with an aim to problem solve, to tender and bid for local contracts, to build more open source solutions, to fundraise with an aim to seed fund startups, if we dont... we are going to be running around in circles and then move to Rwanda and guess what we will all say ..... they dint do xyz...
Let ask Ourselves ... who is they?
PS: I will stick to shorter posts in the future :)
-- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru
twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565
Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/agostal%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
Hi Sam, For the little bits and pieces of information that keep trickling out, it appears that a company called "Next Technologies" bid and won. This is the company that had previously provided the system that handled various by-elections and the referendum for the new constitution. They never got round to implementation because IEBC decided to do the RTS development in-house and called on Next for support as an external contractor. So in this case I guess we could (sort of) say that "they" is IEBC's IT team. But having said that, we are not absolved from the responsibility of being as much a part of the process so that instead of being retrospective we can be proactive. Best regards, Brian On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Sam Gichuru <gichuru@gmail.com> wrote:
Please allow me to post this as a new thread...
Added - My concern has been our reactions to the IEBC system failure, I applaud the doers in this country, I applaud those who bid and lost and those who won the contract to implement the system, I applaud them for their failure which means we are still alive and crawling but we will soon learn to talk and say baba and mama as the tech industry in Kenya, but my major concern is the rest of us...
What I am seeing and I stand to be corrected is the spectator syndrome, when everything is ok and the international press highlight Kenya as a tech destination, Mpesa is praised, Ushahidi and startups with all our Mvitus, we celebrate, claim our team (#teamtech/ICT) is winning and write long blog posts and gazillion tweets etc
This only last as long as nothing goes wrong, but when it does, suddenly the conversation changes from "we" to "them", they have failed, they dint consult, they dint test, they... not us. This is what most football fans/Spectators do, they love their football team only when its winning, which basically makes one wonder are we players or are we fans of this game?
But to bring this home, we have a bigger problem, if this community started asking about the procurement process, the system architect and the companies that were selected to implement the IEBC system only after it failed, we are not engaging enough, are we saying that nobody in this list bid for this system? nobody tried? ... doesn't that mean we are just talking ..... and talk is cheap.
I would like to challenge the community to engage more with an aim to problem solve, to tender and bid for local contracts, to build more open source solutions, to fundraise with an aim to seed fund startups, if we dont... we are going to be running around in circles and then move to Rwanda and guess what we will all say ..... they dint do xyz...
Let ask Ourselves ... who is they?
PS: I will stick to shorter posts in the future :)
-- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru
twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565
Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
@Sam, you submission is very good. @Brian, your update on the fact that the system was developed in-house is true going by the feedback provided the IEBC chairman. I think a session to identify the real problem or series of problems would be good to enable the local software development sub-sector learn from this and influence a better future where a solution is found not just for this case but also future projects. Brian & Sam, you have my support towards a solution. On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi Sam,
For the little bits and pieces of information that keep trickling out, it appears that a company called "Next Technologies" bid and won. This is the company that had previously provided the system that handled various by-elections and the referendum for the new constitution. They never got round to implementation because IEBC decided to do the RTS development in-house and called on Next for support as an external contractor.
So in this case I guess we could (sort of) say that "they" is IEBC's IT team. But having said that, we are not absolved from the responsibility of being as much a part of the process so that instead of being retrospective we can be proactive.
Best regards,
Brian
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Sam Gichuru <gichuru@gmail.com> wrote:
Please allow me to post this as a new thread...
Added - My concern has been our reactions to the IEBC system failure, I applaud the doers in this country, I applaud those who bid and lost and those who won the contract to implement the system, I applaud them for their failure which means we are still alive and crawling but we will soon learn to talk and say baba and mama as the tech industry in Kenya, but my major concern is the rest of us...
What I am seeing and I stand to be corrected is the spectator syndrome, when everything is ok and the international press highlight Kenya as a tech destination, Mpesa is praised, Ushahidi and startups with all our Mvitus, we celebrate, claim our team (#teamtech/ICT) is winning and write long blog posts and gazillion tweets etc
This only last as long as nothing goes wrong, but when it does, suddenly the conversation changes from "we" to "them", they have failed, they dint consult, they dint test, they... not us. This is what most football fans/Spectators do, they love their football team only when its winning, which basically makes one wonder are we players or are we fans of this game?
But to bring this home, we have a bigger problem, if this community started asking about the procurement process, the system architect and the companies that were selected to implement the IEBC system only after it failed, we are not engaging enough, are we saying that nobody in this list bid for this system? nobody tried? ... doesn't that mean we are just talking ..... and talk is cheap.
I would like to challenge the community to engage more with an aim to problem solve, to tender and bid for local contracts, to build more open source solutions, to fundraise with an aim to seed fund startups, if we dont... we are going to be running around in circles and then move to Rwanda and guess what we will all say ..... they dint do xyz...
Let ask Ourselves ... who is they?
PS: I will stick to shorter posts in the future :)
-- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru
twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565
Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/dmuthoni%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Muthoni My Blog: http://rugongo.blogspot.com/ -------------------------------------------- Mahatma Gandhi once said:- First they ignore you, Then they laugh at you, Then they fight you, AND THEN YOU WIN!!!
Which in itself should raise alarm bells. IEBC's competence is conducting elections and not developing software. That is as peculiar as staff who run a nuclear reactor deciding they can build one themselves. Why did they take such a risky decision? And who approved it? On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Brian Munyao Longwe wrote:
Hi Sam,
For the little bits and pieces of information that keep trickling out, it appears that a company called "Next Technologies" bid and won. This is the company that had previously provided the system that handled various by-elections and the referendum for the new constitution. They never got round to implementation because IEBC decided to do the RTS development in-house and called on Next for support as an external contractor.
So in this case I guess we could (sort of) say that "they" is IEBC's IT team. But having said that, we are not absolved from the responsibility of being as much a part of the process so that instead of being retrospective we can be proactive.
Best regards,
Brian
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Sam Gichuru <gichuru@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'gichuru@gmail.com');>
wrote:
Please allow me to post this as a new thread...
Added - My concern has been our reactions to the IEBC system failure, I applaud the doers in this country, I applaud those who bid and lost and those who won the contract to implement the system, I applaud them for their failure which means we are still alive and crawling but we will soon learn to talk and say baba and mama as the tech industry in Kenya, but my major concern is the rest of us...
What I am seeing and I stand to be corrected is the spectator syndrome, when everything is ok and the international press highlight Kenya as a tech destination, Mpesa is praised, Ushahidi and startups with all our Mvitus, we celebrate, claim our team (#teamtech/ICT) is winning and write long blog posts and gazillion tweets etc
This only last as long as nothing goes wrong, but when it does, suddenly the conversation changes from "we" to "them", they have failed, they dint consult, they dint test, they... not us. This is what most football fans/Spectators do, they love their football team only when its winning, which basically makes one wonder are we players or are we fans of this game?
But to bring this home, we have a bigger problem, if this community started asking about the procurement process, the system architect and the companies that were selected to implement the IEBC system only after it failed, we are not engaging enough, are we saying that nobody in this list bid for this system? nobody tried? ... doesn't that mean we are just talking ..... and talk is cheap.
I would like to challenge the community to engage more with an aim to problem solve, to tender and bid for local contracts, to build more open source solutions, to fundraise with an aim to seed fund startups, if we dont... we are going to be running around in circles and then move to Rwanda and guess what we will all say ..... they dint do xyz...
Let ask Ourselves ... who is they?
PS: I will stick to shorter posts in the future :)
-- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru
twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565
Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke');> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
Why is there speculation and trickling of information? Aren't the details of procurement a public affair? I thought only the Defense department was allowed to be secretive about buying boilers? I recall someone inviting hackers to have their go at the IEBC systems, did anyone try to penetrate and I assume they must have had some sort of access to it. On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Rad! <conradakunga@gmail.com> wrote:
Which in itself should raise alarm bells.
IEBC's competence is conducting elections and not developing software. That is as peculiar as staff who run a nuclear reactor deciding they can build one themselves.
Why did they take such a risky decision? And who approved it?
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Brian Munyao Longwe wrote:
Hi Sam,
For the little bits and pieces of information that keep trickling out, it appears that a company called "Next Technologies" bid and won. This is the company that had previously provided the system that handled various by-elections and the referendum for the new constitution. They never got round to implementation because IEBC decided to do the RTS development in-house and called on Next for support as an external contractor.
So in this case I guess we could (sort of) say that "they" is IEBC's IT team. But having said that, we are not absolved from the responsibility of being as much a part of the process so that instead of being retrospective we can be proactive.
Best regards,
Brian
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Sam Gichuru <gichuru@gmail.com> wrote:
Please allow me to post this as a new thread...
Added - My concern has been our reactions to the IEBC system failure, I applaud the doers in this country, I applaud those who bid and lost and those who won the contract to implement the system, I applaud them for their failure which means we are still alive and crawling but we will soon learn to talk and say baba and mama as the tech industry in Kenya, but my major concern is the rest of us...
What I am seeing and I stand to be corrected is the spectator syndrome, when everything is ok and the international press highlight Kenya as a tech destination, Mpesa is praised, Ushahidi and startups with all our Mvitus, we celebrate, claim our team (#teamtech/ICT) is winning and write long blog posts and gazillion tweets etc
This only last as long as nothing goes wrong, but when it does, suddenly the conversation changes from "we" to "them", they have failed, they dint consult, they dint test, they... not us. This is what most football fans/Spectators do, they love their football team only when its winning, which basically makes one wonder are we players or are we fans of this game?
But to bring this home, we have a bigger problem, if this community started asking about the procurement process, the system architect and the companies that were selected to implement the IEBC system only after it failed, we are not engaging enough, are we saying that nobody in this list bid for this system? nobody tried? ... doesn't that mean we are just talking ..... and talk is cheap.
I would like to challenge the community to engage more with an aim to problem solve, to tender and bid for local contracts, to build more open source solutions, to fundraise with an aim to seed fund startups, if we dont... we are going to be running around in circles and then move to Rwanda and guess what we will all say ..... they dint do xyz...
Let ask Ourselves ... who is they?
PS: I will stick to shorter posts in the future :)
-- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru
twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565
Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards, Mark Mwangi markmwangi.me.ke
Just been told of this big announcement in a church and I added a line or two, I think it should be put our email footers :) Do not ask If someone is going to do it... someone Died a while back.. , so if your are not going to do it, its not going to get Done.. :) I had to share that one. On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Mark Mwangi <mwangy@gmail.com> wrote:
Why is there speculation and trickling of information? Aren't the details of procurement a public affair? I thought only the Defense department was allowed to be secretive about buying boilers? I recall someone inviting hackers to have their go at the IEBC systems, did anyone try to penetrate and I assume they must have had some sort of access to it.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Rad! <conradakunga@gmail.com> wrote:
Which in itself should raise alarm bells.
IEBC's competence is conducting elections and not developing software. That is as peculiar as staff who run a nuclear reactor deciding they can build one themselves.
Why did they take such a risky decision? And who approved it?
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Brian Munyao Longwe wrote:
Hi Sam,
For the little bits and pieces of information that keep trickling out, it appears that a company called "Next Technologies" bid and won. This is the company that had previously provided the system that handled various by-elections and the referendum for the new constitution. They never got round to implementation because IEBC decided to do the RTS development in-house and called on Next for support as an external contractor.
So in this case I guess we could (sort of) say that "they" is IEBC's IT team. But having said that, we are not absolved from the responsibility of being as much a part of the process so that instead of being retrospective we can be proactive.
Best regards,
Brian
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Sam Gichuru <gichuru@gmail.com> wrote:
Please allow me to post this as a new thread...
Added - My concern has been our reactions to the IEBC system failure, I applaud the doers in this country, I applaud those who bid and lost and those who won the contract to implement the system, I applaud them for their failure which means we are still alive and crawling but we will soon learn to talk and say baba and mama as the tech industry in Kenya, but my major concern is the rest of us...
What I am seeing and I stand to be corrected is the spectator syndrome, when everything is ok and the international press highlight Kenya as a tech destination, Mpesa is praised, Ushahidi and startups with all our Mvitus, we celebrate, claim our team (#teamtech/ICT) is winning and write long blog posts and gazillion tweets etc
This only last as long as nothing goes wrong, but when it does, suddenly the conversation changes from "we" to "them", they have failed, they dint consult, they dint test, they... not us. This is what most football fans/Spectators do, they love their football team only when its winning, which basically makes one wonder are we players or are we fans of this game?
But to bring this home, we have a bigger problem, if this community started asking about the procurement process, the system architect and the companies that were selected to implement the IEBC system only after it failed, we are not engaging enough, are we saying that nobody in this list bid for this system? nobody tried? ... doesn't that mean we are just talking ..... and talk is cheap.
I would like to challenge the community to engage more with an aim to problem solve, to tender and bid for local contracts, to build more open source solutions, to fundraise with an aim to seed fund startups, if we dont... we are going to be running around in circles and then move to Rwanda and guess what we will all say ..... they dint do xyz...
Let ask Ourselves ... who is they?
PS: I will stick to shorter posts in the future :)
-- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru
twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565
Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards,
Mark Mwangi
markmwangi.me.ke
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/gichuru%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Warm Regards, ------------------------ Sam Gichuru twitter: | @samgichuru <http://twitter.com/samgichuru> Blog: | www.samgichuru.com Facebook: | Sam.gichuru <http://www.facebook.com/sam.gichuru> Skype: Sam.gichuru Cellphone: | +254-722-730565 Co-founder/ Director /Nailab Incubation Location: | Nairobi Website: | www.nailab.co.ke twitter: | @thenailab
participants (6)
-
Agosta Liko -
Brian Munyao Longwe -
Dorcas Muthoni -
Mark Mwangi -
Rad! -
Sam Gichuru