Re: [kictanet] Media Council Draft Bill 2010 (Day one discussion)
Hi KK, Not meaning to be too argumentative (especially on a tiring Monday) - but does content exclude what the media (as journalists, producers, announcers, owners etc) create or offer in terms of talk shows, re-briadcasting etc etc whether on radio or TV. My point is, if the MCK is working well to develop professional ethics (across the board - journalist, producers, advertiser, etc etc), ergo there is no need for BCAC? Or is BCAC a safety net such that where media practitioners of the sorts described, STILL allow unsuitable/provocative/inaccurate/fraudulent/etc content to be shared? On , "kk ombati" <kaykerubo@gmail.com> wrote:
hi francis
the main difference between the two is that the media council is
intended to regulate journalists and media professionals by setting
educational and ethical standards for journalist somewhat like ICPAK
and LSK.
whereas the BCAC are to be set up to regulate the content on news,radio etc
On 1/24/11, Francis Hook francis.hook@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Grace
First - what is the difference between this ----->
http://www.mediacouncil.or.ke/ and the body proposed below?
- I have seen an old story (
http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Company%20Industry/-/539550/853208/-/view...)
that mentions the creation of the Broadcast Advisory Council (according to
that link it was to be in place about one year ago). I have also seen
mention of "Broadcasting Content Advisory Council" -
http://www.cck.go.ke/news/2010/news_09june2010.html - and from there I'd
like to quote:
"...Information and Communications Minister Hon. Samuel Poghisio urged the
Council to move with speed to rid the airwaves of inappropriate
programming."
Please bear with me if this seems off topic- but in a sense perhaps this
offers pause for thought on whether a media council will indeed make any
difference if a broadcast content advisory council is YET to show any
difference on matters that IMHO are no-brainers (like reading a recipe -
eg if the music video is intended for adult audiences, DO NOT PLAY IT -
simple - not rocket science) .
The BCAC was inaugurated in June 2010 - its been six months now and
according to the quote above we really should have seen some difference.
Could someone please provide me with contact details for the BCAC?
On 24 January 2011 13:58, Grace Githaiga ggithaiga@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear All
Thanks Walubengo, Khisa, Cook and Toby for your insights. And just a quick
response to each of you:
Walu, Yes there is a media policy in place that was passed just before
the
KCA Act of 2008. Unfortunately I do not have a copy and I have checked at
the Ministry of Information website. It is also not available. But the MCK
Bill has a basis on the media policy in matters of regulation. So, we are
on
the right track. There is a media council in place. I will not judge its
success but I do know it has continued to receive complaints from the
public. It also has conducted several trainings aimed at professionalizing
the media.
Khisa, the MCK is one form of control mechanism. There is also the
broadcast Advisory Council (under CCK) where ordinary people can lodge in
their complaints/concerns on news and programmes.
Hook, I apologize on that repetition. It should actually read… "interests
of all sections of society". Please find attached a soft copy of the MCK
Bill 2010 for ease of reference. You can also access it on
http://www.information.go.ke. On your suggestions to re-phrase it to
capture common morals and ethics, this number 2 is in Article 34 (5) of
the
constitution. At this point, we can only make suggestions on the MCK Bill
and not on the constitution. But lets see if there are possibilities of
capturing your concerns in the subsequent dicussions.
In regard to content on some of the FM Stations, there is a Broadcasting
Advisory Council to take care of this. And this is in addition to MCK
which
deals with complaints regarding media conduct. We will be discussing the
composition of the Council on day 4 (Thursday this week). I can already
tell
you that religious leaders are not proposed. However, it would be
important
for you to make contributions on which other professions should comprise
Council Members.
Toby, I agree with your sentiments. However my understanding is that a
constitution is only meant to provide guidelines. The specifics can be
spelt
out in the Act. And yes some concerns you have raised about registration
of
journalists will be dealt with later in the week. We hope to see your
reflection(s) on this.
Thanks a lot people. Please lets hear more from the rest of the listers.
And just a reminder of today's discussion:
The purpose of the Media Council Bill:
*An Act of Parliament to provide for the realization of the right to
freedom of expression and freedom of media; for the establishment of the
Media Council of Kenya; for the conduct and discipline of journalists and
the media, and for connected purposes.*
Article 33 of the Constitution provides for Freedom of Expression, while
Article 34 provides for the freedom of Media. Further in Article 34, sub
article 5, it states...Parliament shall enact legislation that provides
for
the establishment of a body which shall:
a) be independent of control by government, political interests or
commercial interests;
b) reflect the interests of all sections of society; and
c) set media standards and regulate and monitor compliance with those
standards.
We welcome responses/reflections to the following:
1. Is the purpose (as stated above) satisfactory, or should it be
enhanced to reflect the provisions in the constitution?
2. Is this proposed Media Council best placed to perform and fulfill
this purpose?
3. Will the proposed Media Council enhance professionalism and growth
of media in Kenya?
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
This message was sent to: francis.hook@gmail.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/francis.hook%40gmail.co...
--
Francis Hook
+254 733 504561
content does include what media(journalists,presenters) offer in their shows and broadcast...and if you have a look at Schedule two of the Media Bill 2010,it contains a code of conduct which touches on guidleinestogovern the content of news,broadcasts etc, but remember the media bill is specifically targeted towards creating professional standards for journalists,which includes setting minimum educational and ethical standards and the regulation of what content a journalist may or may notbroadcast or print is merely one facet of the purpose of the act. the BCAC regulates content in that it targets persons other than journalists e.g.media house owners etc..because sometimes the journalists are dictated to in terms of what they may or may not say on paper or on air by their media houses.That's where the BCAC comes in to regulate the content that media houses(which by implication includes journalists)should or should not broadcast or print plus it deals with other factors like censorship,which are outside a journalist's scope of duties. On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, <Francis.Hook@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi KK, Not meaning to be too argumentative (especially on a tiring Monday) - but does content exclude what the media (as journalists, producers, announcers, owners etc) create or offer in terms of talk shows, re-briadcasting etc etc whether on radio or TV. My point is, if the MCK is working well to develop professional ethics (across the board - journalist, producers, advertiser, etc etc), ergo there is no need for BCAC? Or is BCAC a safety net such that where media practitioners of the sorts described, STILL allow unsuitable/provocative/inaccurate/fraudulent/etc content to be shared?
On , "k.k. ombati" <kaykerubo@gmail.com> wrote:
hi francis
the main difference between the two is that the media council is
intended to regulate journalists and media professionals by setting
educational and ethical standards for journalist somewhat like ICPAK
and LSK.
whereas the BCAC are to be set up to regulate the content on news,radio etc
On 1/24/11, Francis Hook francis.hook@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Grace
First - what is the difference between this ----->
http://www.mediacouncil.or.ke/ and the body proposed below?
- I have seen an old story (
http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Company%20Industry/-/539550/853208/-/view...)
that mentions the creation of the Broadcast Advisory Council (according to
that link it was to be in place about one year ago). I have also seen
mention of "Broadcasting Content Advisory Council" -
http://www.cck.go.ke/news/2010/news_09june2010.html - and from there I'd
like to quote:
"...Information and Communications Minister Hon. Samuel Poghisio urged the
Council to move with speed to rid the airwaves of inappropriate
programming."
Please bear with me if this seems off topic- but in a sense perhaps this
offers pause for thought on whether a media council will indeed make any
difference if a broadcast content advisory council is YET to show any
difference on matters that IMHO are no-brainers (like reading a recipe -
e.g. if the music video is intended for adult audiences, DO NOT PLAY IT -
simple - not rocket science) .
The BCAC was inaugurated in June 2010 - its been six months now and
according to the quote above we really should have seen some difference.
Could someone please provide me with contact details for the BCAC?
On 24 January 2011 13:58, Grace Githaiga ggithaiga@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear All
Thanks Walubengo, Khisa, Cook and Toby for your insights. And just a quick
response to each of you:
Walu, Yes there is a media policy in place that was passed just before
the
KCA Act of 2008. Unfortunately I do not have a copy and I have checked at
the Ministry of Information website. It is also not available. But the MCK
Bill has a basis on the media policy in matters of regulation. So, we are
on
the right track. There is a media council in place. I will not judge its
success but I do know it has continued to receive complaints from the
public. It also has conducted several trainings aimed at professionalizing
the media.
Khisa, the MCK is one form of control mechanism. There is also the
broadcast Advisory Council (under CCK) where ordinary people can lodge in
their complaints/concerns on news and programmes.
Hook, I apologize on that repetition. It should actually read… "interests
of all sections of society". Please find attached a soft copy of the MCK
Bill 2010 for ease of reference. You can also access it on
http://www.information.go.ke. On your suggestions to re-phrase it to
capture common morals and ethics, this number 2 is in Article 34 (5) of
the
constitution. At this point, we can only make suggestions on the MCK Bill
and not on the constitution. But lets see if there are possibilities of
capturing your concerns in the subsequent dicussions.
In regard to content on some of the FM Stations, there is a Broadcasting
Advisory Council to take care of this. And this is in addition to MCK
which
deals with complaints regarding media conduct. We will be discussing the
composition of the Council on day 4 (Thursday this week). I can already
tell
you that religious leaders are not proposed. However, it would be
important
for you to make contributions on which other professions should comprise
Council Members.
Toby, I agree with your sentiments. However my understanding is that a
constitution is only meant to provide guidelines. The specifics can be
spelt
out in the Act. And yes some concerns you have raised about registration
of
journalists will be dealt with later in the week. We hope to see your
reflection(s) on this.
Thanks a lot people. Please lets hear more from the rest of the listers.
And just a reminder of today's discussion:
The purpose of the Media Council Bill:
*An Act of Parliament to provide for the realization of the right to
freedom of expression and freedom of media; for the establishment of the
Media Council of Kenya; for the conduct and discipline of journalists and
the media, and for connected purposes.*
Article 33 of the Constitution provides for Freedom of Expression, while
Article 34 provides for the freedom of Media. Further in Article 34, sub
article 5, it states...Parliament shall enact legislation that provides
for
the establishment of a body which shall:
a) be independent of control by government, political interests or
commercial interests;
b) reflect the interests of all sections of society; and
c) set media standards and regulate and monitor compliance with those
standards.
We welcome responses/reflections to the following:
1. Is the purpose (as stated above) satisfactory, or should it be
enhanced to reflect the provisions in the constitution?
2. Is this proposed Media Council best placed to perform and fulfill
this purpose?
3. Will the proposed Media Council enhance professionalism and growth
of media in Kenya?
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
This message was sent to: francis.hook@gmail.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/francis.hook%40gmail.co...
--
Francis Hook
+254 733 504561
participants (2)
-
Francis.Hook@gmail.com
-
k.k. ombati