Joint Statement on the Proposed Cybercrime Treaty Ahead of the Concluding Session

Dear Listers, A joint statement from a coalition of civil society groups and individual experts argues that the current draft of the UN Cybercrime Convention poses a threat to human rights and calls for significant changes before it is adopted. Concerns: - The Convention is too broad and could criminalize legitimate online activities. - It lacks sufficient safeguards for journalists, activists, and security researchers. - It doesn't adequately protect human rights and privacy. - It proposes excessive information sharing and monitoring practices. *Demands:* - Narrow the scope of the Convention to focus on specific cybercrimes. - Include protections for legitimate online activities and freedom of expression. - Strengthen human rights and data protection safeguards. - Limit information sharing and require judicial oversight. - Avoid endorsing surveillance provisions that undermine encryption. "The outcome of the treaty negotiation process should only be deemed acceptable if it effectively incorporates strong and meaningful safeguards to protect human rights, ensures legal clarity for fairness and due process, and fosters international cooperation under the rule of law." Civil Society Groups Raise Concerns Over Proposed UN Cybercrime Convention | KICTANet Think Tank <https://www.kictanet.or.ke/civil-society-groups-raise-concerns-over-proposed-un-cybercrime-convention/> -- *Kind Regards,* *David Indeje* *KICTANet Communications *_____________________________________ +254 (0) 711 385 945 | +254 (0) 734 024 856 KICTANet portals KICTANet.or.ke <https://kictanet.or.ke/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/kictanet> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/18428106/admin/> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/>
participants (1)
-
David Indeje