Re: [kictanet] kictanet Digest, Vol 47, Issue 70 - Africa IGF
Hi people I agree that the most important participation needed is at national level. In Côte d'Ivoire where I live, we have a formal and functioning IG initiative with even an elected President. The man had been to Kenya also to understudy the Kenya IGF. The IGICI, the Ivorian one, is entirely sponsored by national stakeholders. In West Africa, OSIWA has given a 1 year support for the WAIGF, which hitherto had been supported partly by AfriNic and partners. The framework of WAIGF (which is being managed by FOSSFA) was to have a resource person in a country and support that individual to do an initial mobilisation, so that once an initial national IGF was organised, national stakeholders will take it from there. Here are the issues: 1. The WAIGF does not cover all the countries. So 1 year support to 8 out of 15 countries is not sustainable. At this time, the countries that may be able to carry on without continued support in West Africa may be Senegal, Gambia, Ghana, Sierra Leone and Nigeria. 2. Central Africa is far more shaky than West Africa. Schombe Baudoin can update on that. 3. ECA has been lending support to EAIGF, (according to Makane) but there was not any national IG initiative in Ethiopia until last two weeks after we finished the Diplo training in Addis and the ET participants agreed to begin something. 4. The SAIGF idea is only about a few months old. I know Anriette of APC has started work on this, but so far, there are not much national IGF in the region. 5. North Africa, I am not aware of (I may be wrong) On AFIGF, what we have so far is ECA and AU saying "it is a good idea and we will go for it". And NEPAD saying, 'it is a good idea and we will support it", and Diplo that is willing to engage. Nonetheless, there are questions on how best an AFIGF can best serve the needs of ongoing and yet-to-start initiatives, outside of a once-a-year meeting. The other important issue also is that there are key stakeholders who are not necessarily linked to a sub-region, like ADB, ATU, MTN who need to engage. As well as sub-regional economic commissions. In west Africa, ECOWAS has not been very active, despite a willingness. When I heard that ECA had accepted to hold the IG workshop, I contacted the people involved in the ongoing initiatives and sent a draft for the AFIGF that I wanted to go and present at Addis. So what we have now is a kind of evolving document on : What will an African initiative look like and what should it accomplish? Hopefully, an open forum will happen in Nairobi so that stakeholder present can evaluate and decide what direction is best. It is true that for some countries where with an active IGF, it might seem like a waste of energy, but for some other countries, they are hoping to ride on the back of AFIGF to either begin or strengthen their national IGF. All the best Nnenna Nnenna Nwakanma | Founder and CEO, NNENNA.ORG | Consultants Information | Communications | Technology and Events | for Development Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire (+225)| Tel: 225 27144 | Fax 224 26471 |Mob. 07416820 Accra, Ghana (+233) Tel: 0249561345 | http://www.nnenna.org | nnenna@nnenna.org Twitter - @nnenna | Skype - nnenna75 | nnennaorg.blogspot.com Your multi-lingual development and event partners across Africa.
Very nice summary, Nnenna, it's really well marked and it helps to understand and feel the dynamics of IGF in africa at the sub regional and national levels. We make great efforts in Central Africa but we also need your experience. We need to Nairobi, the African community is present in a qualitative way. Senegal, Kenya, Ghana, Rwanda, Burundi .... to name but a few, have managed nationally. I think we need to rely on the African s olidarity that national IGFs become the bedrock of IGF subregional. SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN *COORDONNATEUR DU CENTRE AFRICAIN D'ECHANGE CULTUREL (CAFEC) ACADEMIE DES TIC *COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC *MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE *AT-LARGE MEMBER (ICANN) *NCUC/GNSO MEMBER (ICANN) Téléphone mobile:+243998983491 email : b.schombe@gmail.com skype : b.schombe blog : http://akimambo.unblog.fr Site Web : www.ticafrica.net 2011/4/21 Nnenna Nwakanma <nnenna@nnenna.org>
Hi people
I agree that the most important participation needed is at national level. In Côte d'Ivoire where I live, we have a formal and functioning IG initiative with even an elected President. The man had been to Kenya also to understudy the Kenya IGF. The IGICI, the Ivorian one, is entirely sponsored by national stakeholders.
In West Africa, OSIWA has given a 1 year support for the WAIGF, which hitherto had been supported partly by AfriNic and partners. The framework of WAIGF (which is being managed by FOSSFA) was to have a resource person in a country and support that individual to do an initial mobilisation, so that once an initial national IGF was organised, national stakeholders will take it from there.
Here are the issues: 1. The WAIGF does not cover all the countries. So 1 year support to 8 out of 15 countries is not sustainable. At this time, the countries that may be able to carry on without continued support in West Africa may be Senegal, Gambia, Ghana, Sierra Leone and Nigeria. 2. Central Africa is far more shaky than West Africa. Schombe Baudoin can update on that. 3. ECA has been lending support to EAIGF, (according to Makane) but there was not any national IG initiative in Ethiopia until last two weeks after we finished the Diplo training in Addis and the ET participants agreed to begin something. 4. The SAIGF idea is only about a few months old. I know Anriette of APC has started work on this, but so far, there are not much national IGF in the region. 5. North Africa, I am not aware of (I may be wrong)
On AFIGF, what we have so far is ECA and AU saying "it is a good idea and we will go for it". And NEPAD saying, 'it is a good idea and we will support it", and Diplo that is willing to engage.
Nonetheless, there are questions on how best an AFIGF can best serve the needs of ongoing and yet-to-start initiatives, outside of a once-a-year meeting. The other important issue also is that there are key stakeholders who are not necessarily linked to a sub-region, like ADB, ATU, MTN who need to engage. As well as sub-regional economic commissions. In west Africa, ECOWAS has not been very active, despite a willingness.
When I heard that ECA had accepted to hold the IG workshop, I contacted the people involved in the ongoing initiatives and sent a draft for the AFIGF that I wanted to go and present at Addis. So what we have now is a kind of evolving document on : What will an African initiative look like and what should it accomplish? Hopefully, an open forum will happen in Nairobi so that stakeholder present can evaluate and decide what direction is best.
It is true that for some countries where with an active IGF, it might seem like a waste of energy, but for some other countries, they are hoping to ride on the back of AFIGF to either begin or strengthen their national IGF.
All the best
Nnenna
Nnenna Nwakanma | Founder and CEO, NNENNA.ORG <http://nnenna.org/> | Consultants Information | Communications | Technology and Events | for Development Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire (+225)| Tel: 225 27144 | Fax 224 26471 |Mob. 07416820 Accra, Ghana (+233) Tel: 0249561345 | http://www.nnenna.org | nnenna@nnenna.org Twitter - @nnenna | Skype - nnenna75 | nnennaorg.blogspot.com
Your multi-lingual development and event partners across Africa.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/b.schombe%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
Thank you Nnenna. Corrections regarding the EA-IGF. The first one was held in 2008 and supported entierly by Kenya stakeholders and the International Development and research Centre (IDRC). The second, 2009 was supported by Kenyan stakeholders, regional and international partners. Third was supported by Ugandan stakeholders and regional and international partners. The fourth is being supported by Rwandan stakeholders. Please see www.eaigf.or.ke for more details. Alice -----Original Message----- From: Nnenna Nwakanma <nnenna@nnenna.org> Sender: kictanet-bounces+alice=apc.org@lists.kictanet.or.ke Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:27:47 To: <alice@apc.org> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> Subject: Re: [kictanet] kictanet Digest, Vol 47, Issue 70 - Africa IGF Hi people I agree that the most important participation needed is at national level. In Côte d'Ivoire where I live, we have a formal and functioning IG initiative with even an elected President. The man had been to Kenya also to understudy the Kenya IGF. The IGICI, the Ivorian one, is entirely sponsored by national stakeholders. In West Africa, OSIWA has given a 1 year support for the WAIGF, which hitherto had been supported partly by AfriNic and partners. The framework of WAIGF (which is being managed by FOSSFA) was to have a resource person in a country and support that individual to do an initial mobilisation, so that once an initial national IGF was organised, national stakeholders will take it from there. Here are the issues: 1. The WAIGF does not cover all the countries. So 1 year support to 8 out of 15 countries is not sustainable. At this time, the countries that may be able to carry on without continued support in West Africa may be Senegal, Gambia, Ghana, Sierra Leone and Nigeria. 2. Central Africa is far more shaky than West Africa. Schombe Baudoin can update on that. 3. ECA has been lending support to EAIGF, (according to Makane) but there was not any national IG initiative in Ethiopia until last two weeks after we finished the Diplo training in Addis and the ET participants agreed to begin something. 4. The SAIGF idea is only about a few months old. I know Anriette of APC has started work on this, but so far, there are not much national IGF in the region. 5. North Africa, I am not aware of (I may be wrong) On AFIGF, what we have so far is ECA and AU saying "it is a good idea and we will go for it". And NEPAD saying, 'it is a good idea and we will support it", and Diplo that is willing to engage. Nonetheless, there are questions on how best an AFIGF can best serve the needs of ongoing and yet-to-start initiatives, outside of a once-a-year meeting. The other important issue also is that there are key stakeholders who are not necessarily linked to a sub-region, like ADB, ATU, MTN who need to engage. As well as sub-regional economic commissions. In west Africa, ECOWAS has not been very active, despite a willingness. When I heard that ECA had accepted to hold the IG workshop, I contacted the people involved in the ongoing initiatives and sent a draft for the AFIGF that I wanted to go and present at Addis. So what we have now is a kind of evolving document on : What will an African initiative look like and what should it accomplish? Hopefully, an open forum will happen in Nairobi so that stakeholder present can evaluate and decide what direction is best. It is true that for some countries where with an active IGF, it might seem like a waste of energy, but for some other countries, they are hoping to ride on the back of AFIGF to either begin or strengthen their national IGF. All the best Nnenna Nnenna Nwakanma | Founder and CEO, NNENNA.ORG | Consultants Information | Communications | Technology and Events | for Development Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire (+225)| Tel: 225 27144 | Fax 224 26471 |Mob. 07416820 Accra, Ghana (+233) Tel: 0249561345 | http://www.nnenna.org | nnenna@nnenna.org Twitter - @nnenna | Skype - nnenna75 | nnennaorg.blogspot.com Your multi-lingual development and event partners across Africa. _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
participants (3)
-
alice＠apc.org -
Baudouin SCHOMBE -
Nnenna Nwakanma