Adam good thoughts..especially
****"If Safaricom can sell LTE to the 1% and that makes enough money to pay
well for the spectrum license and GoK then uses that money for the USF
to build 3G towers in rural areas - then that's really great".
But then again Safcom is not a charity organisation and may rather pay out the profits to the shareholders (like me :-) rather than build extra 3G towers to remote non economic zones in Kenya.
then
***"4G/LTE deployments aren't really that much more expensive than 3G as I understand it."
I dont have the actual costs, but the fact is 4G/LTE base stations have a small footprint/radius compared to 3G, so you will require more base stations to cover larger areas/populations. More base stations more money hence the cost of service to the customer can only be higher.
*** The big difference is the 'cost' of the spectrum - which is whatever the market will bear.
actually cost of spectrum will be decided/or has been decided by the Regulator. But the point is, even if it was given away for free, or through trading there is no guarantee that the benefit will not be translated to the consumer.
In summary, I guess my beef is not against the LTE technology( it is good, it is inevitable and it will be deployed). My point is that it will not address the high cost of communication and is not likely to address the bigger picture (getting everyone online).
And yes, that is not Safaricom's problem but the Regulators problem.
walu.
From: Adam Nelson <adam@varud.com>
To: Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [kictanet] LTE/4G and the state of broadband and Universal Access in Kenya
Walu,
The best response to your article is in the comments:
"4G brings with it unique capabilities like VoLte with lean radio protocol stack...3G voice is only possible with forced 2G fall back..so we need 4G...one will not need 2 radio access types to obtain service...one lean 4G radio access is enough...the capex is also low given smaller equipment footprint..."
4G/LTE deployments aren't really that much more expensive than 3G as I understand it. The big difference is the 'cost' of the spectrum - which is whatever the market will bear. If Safaricom can sell LTE to the 1% and that makes enough money to pay well for the spectrum license and GoK then uses that money for the USF to build 3G towers in rural areas - then that's really great.
What would be better is a decoupling of the tower system from the providers and then there can be a single LTE network run by a utility that rents space in a well regulated way to the MNOs ... but even though Rwanda is doing that, I don't see Kenya following in that path.
-Adam