On 26 April 2016 at 10:26, Tony White via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
5.1.    Some of the features the NAS System should have include the following;
...
...
j) The system places the responsibility of address display to the
citizen and charges a fee, which reduces the need for huge cost
outlay.

...
...
m) Counties will raise revenue from property numbering and addressing fees.
------------------------------------------------------

So this means the residents of Nairobi and elsewhere will pay the county government to have numbers displayed in their gates? Probably an annual fee?
 

As usual, madness prevails!

How can you charge for having an 'address' - which, presumably, will
be mandatory?



______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
twitter.com/lordmwesh