I take the example of e-commerce in the late 1990s and early 2000s, which the Clinton administration sought to frame through policy. Ira Magaziner, a senior advisor for policy development at the White House during the Clinton presidency, headed up the effort to provide an institutional framework in which the nascent e-commerce industry could grow. There are five main principles that were espoused through this work:
The private sector should lead.
Governments should avoid undue restrictions on electronic commerce.
Where governmental involvement is needed, its aim should be to support and enforce a predictable, minimalist, consistent, and simple legal environment for commerce.
Government should recognize the unique qualities of the internet.
Electronic commerce over the internet should be facilitated on a global basis
See enclosed.
Submission of views have been invited.
Will kictanet make any formal submission to the departmental committee working on the bill
Regards,
Sent from Samsung tablet
On Jul 6, 2016 3:47 PM, Alex Watila <awatila@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:Thanks Walu,
What is the way forward on the bill?
Regards,
Alex
From: Walubengo J [mailto:jwalu@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 3:26 PM
To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Cc: Dennis Muthuri <muthuridennis@gmail.com>; Alex Watila <awatila@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Kenya ICT Practitioners Bill - Walu's Views
@Alex, @Muthuri,
Thnx for 'bursting' me @
It does seem the Internet does not forget :-)
Anyway, I still stand by those earlier views. That the ICT professionals should be better organized and speak with one strong voice in order to guide the nation in prosperous and in difficult moments. And that an Act of Parliament would go a long way in ensuring that such a voice is grounded in legislation and therefore cannot be wished away by current or future governments.
However, what I do not agree with is the way such an important bill may have gone 'below the radar' - all the way to the 1st reading. Without most people being aware of it, let alone having a chance to contribute and shape it.
In short, I have always appreciated the problem, but I do not necessarily agree with solutions (contents of the proposed bill), least of all the 'modus-operandi' methods applied to push it through.
So there you have it :-)
walu.
From: Dennis Muthuri via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
To: jwalu@yahoo.com
Cc: Dennis Muthuri <muthuridennis@gmail.com>; Alex Watila <awatila@yahoo.co.uk>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Draft National ICTPolicy:-End of Online Discussions
Thanks Alex,
I’d like to hear bwana Walu’s views. This is dialogue after all and not a witch hunt. All of us want the best way forward for all stakeholders at the end of the day.
Regards
On 6 Jul 2016, at 2:17 PM, Harry <harry26001@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Alex,
Bwana Walu seems to have ducked "under" on this one, though my sentiment would be that, his oped at the time seemed to lean more on how to give the ICT fraternity a voice through representation at the national stage than what we seeing now with the proposed bill that seems to weigh in more on regulatory policing. Given the multifaceted nature of the ICT space, the worst the proponents can do is to sneak in such proposed regulatory frameworks without as much as subjecting the same to wide multistakeholder input. This could be counter productive, and in fact threatens to stifle the very space that opened up, got liberalized and has thrived for almost 14years and which, has been a catalyst and testament to some of the amazing innovative achievements and growth to date in this sector.
So again, just like the wifi surveillance bill who initiated this..? Where was the consultative engagement..?
Harry
On Jul 6, 2016 11:47 AM, Alex Watila <awatila@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Walu,
Do you need to defend yourself?
http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2305252/-/1208fkiz/-/index.html
Regards,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Watila [mailto:awatila@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:31 AM
To: 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions' <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Cc: 'Harry' <harry26001@gmail.com>; 'Dennis Muthuri' <muthuridennis@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [kictanet] Draft National ICTPolicy:-End of Online Discussions
Dear All,
I think the two issues are related since "to enforce government policies, governments make laws and then enforce the laws."
It would be strange to be discussing a policy while another one seems to be in the process of being given legal authority.
Regards,
Alex
https://twitter.com/hashtag/KillTheICTBill?src=hash
-----Original Message-----
From: kictanet [mailto:kictanet-bounces+awatila=yahoo.co.uk@lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of Harry via kictanet
Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:14 AM
To: awatila@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: Harry <harry26001@gmail.com>; Dennis Muthuri <muthuridennis@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Draft National ICTPolicy:-End of Online Discussions
Hey Dennis,
Welcome on board..!
The Draft National ICT policy, (a review of the last one formulated in 2006) has been under discussion for the past abt 10 days on the forum. You can familiarize yourself with the just ended great debate at www.kitanet.or.ke, under the corresponding link headings.
Walu, just wondering whether this can be extended to allow Listers ventilate on the ICT practitioners bill currently trending exhaustively probably as an issue to be incorporated in the draft policy discussion, as opposed to treating it as a separate issue. As many as are of a similar opinion, say 'aye'..
Harry
On Jul 6, 2016 10:36 AM, Dennis Muthuri via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Hi Hary,
Kindly bring me up to speed with the draft that you are talking about, I joined this mailing list a day ago so I don’t have much context into the matter.
Thanks.
Dennis
On 6 Jul 2016, at 10:33 AM, kictanet-request@lists.kictanet.or.ke wrote:
Re: [kictanet] Draft National ICTPolicy:-End of Online Discussions
Dennis Muthuri Mburugu
Skype: dennis.muthuri | Tel: +(254)714590654_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/awatila%40yahoo.co.uk
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/erick.mwangi%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.