On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:58, Dennis Kioko <dmbuvi@gmail.com> wrote:
What happens when a board is acting in what appears to be against the will of majority of the Kenyans?
Nothing. Appears does not equate to the actual will. Seriously though, this matter is neither here nor there. If the Board has a mandate and acted within that mandate, then the DG should only adhere to that, the imagined "will of the majority" notwithstanding. If it is true that he flanked the interview for the renewal of his contract, and there is no provision that his performance (as perceived) can lead to a reprieve, then the rules of the game must be followed. We should learn to act based on facts/rules, not emotions/perceptions. OTOH, if the law allows "the Minister" to overturn decisions made by the CCK Board, then that, too, is playing by the rules. At a personal level, while not considering whatever rules were being followed, I'd have thought that an individual's contract should be renewed based on performance appraisal. If the DG failed an interview which is part of this appraisal process, then he should leave quietly. This is what no one is willing to tell us about. Unfortunately, the minutes of the Board are not in the public domain. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Damn!!