@ Adam, correct! Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:07:38 +0300 From: adam@varud.com Subject: Re: [kictanet] Matiang’i rules out Safaricom reprieve from licence terms CC: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke To: ggithaiga@hotmail.com I'm just saying that the CCK report should clarify the methodologies used in order to come up with the results and ideally offer a dataset for researchers to analyze. --Kili.io - OpenStack for Africa: kili.ioMusings: twitter.com/varud About Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:28 PM, James Mbugua <jgmbugua@gmail.com> wrote: Adam, So you are saying CCK has fabricated a report to implicate Safaricom? Give us a break. These are parameters which are used everywhere in the world I see no reason you need to nitpick through it trying to find reason to doubt it. Do you normally doubt the ones they put out on subscriber numbers and so on? What I have always supported about Safaricom and that is what they should be arguing, is that it is UNFAIR to allocate the same amount of frequency (Is amount the right word?) to Safaricom with 20million customers as with Orange or yu with about 1m customers and expect the 20 million to have the same quality of service packed into the same space. Otherwise, these QoS reports are independently carried out, the Fallacy of Ad Hominem, looking at who has released them rather than what they say, helps no one. So, yes Matiang'i should expect Safaricom to demand more frequency if it is expected to meet certain conditions with its 20million customers. James On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Kivuva <Kivuva@transworldafrica.com> wrote: The government withdrawing Safaricom licence? Largest taxpayer? How much dividends does the government get from Safaricom? Well we must be very very naivë to believe that. And if the QoS offered by Safaricom is degraded, what does that say about one of the major shareholder called GoK? I am happy to pocket dividents instead of investing the same to improve services! So Matiangi is actually admitting to have failed. On 09/01/2014, Adam Nelson <adam@varud.com> wrote:
I don't see any methodology section in that report. Is this evaluation
using standard methods? If so, what are the actual methods used by CCK to
generate the numbers?
--
Kili.io - OpenStack for Africa: kili.io
Musings: twitter.com/varud <https://twitter.com/varud>
About Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com> wrote:
Adam,
I did send the report link in an earlier post. It was @
http://www.cck.go.ke/consumers/other_info/downloads/REPORT_ON_THE_QUALITY_OF...
The only problem I have is that CCK might be looking at Quality in
isolation. In an ideal situation, the increased No. of subscribers would
put pressure on the Safaricom Network such that its Quality would
deteriorate (which has happened) and subsequently force subscribers to
ran
away to better quality networks (which has NOT happened). If Safaricom
customers had moved to other networks, this would force Safaricom to
naturally improve its Quality (read: invest in Network Capacity Expansion
in tandem with increased Subscriber numbers).
Reading the riot act to Safaricom is not sufficient to warrant Quality
improvement. The departure of its customers would.
So if I was the DG of CCK, I would be working on the WHY are the
suffering
-sorry - Safaricom ustomers like me NOT moving? Sort that out, and the
quality equation will be resolved.
walu.
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 1/9/14, Adam Nelson <adam@varud.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Matiang’i rules out Safaricom reprieve from
licence terms
To: jwalu@yahoo.com
Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014, 11:36 AM
Where is the report?
All I see is a press release with no
report:
And a broken link for the 'Publications &
Statistics' section:
--Kili.io - OpenStack for Africa:
kili.ioMusings: twitter.com/varud
About
Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at
11:26 AM, James Mbugua <jgmbugua@gmail.com>
wrote:
Adam,
It might help if you read the CCK report itself
on their website.
James
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at
11:23 AM, Adam Nelson <adam@varud.com>
wrote:
I guess the US regulators would step in about
voice quality if it was bad in certain areas that the market
wouldn't want to serve. The theory would be that the
spectrum is a public asset licensed to the vendor in order
to further the public good - and that part of the license
terms are to satisfy the public good.
This is why the US landline regulators force
telephone companies to service very rural areas at the same
price as more economically efficient urban
areas.
If CCK was saying that all of the operators
needed to put masts in Turkana as part of a public good,
that would be one thing. But just saying that voice
quality is low in general and not backing it up with how
that compares to international standards (they surely exist
and the article discusses that Safaricom passed such
international tests) seems like a pretty weak argument to
me.
Of course, the writing in the Business Daily
article is so muddled that it's hard to tell what's
actually going on.
--Kili.io - OpenStack for Africa: kili.ioMusings: twitter.com/varud
About
Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson
On Thu,
Jan 9, 2014 at 11:14 AM, James Mbugua <jgmbugua@gmail.com>
wrote:
Adam,
Is it standard in other countries or is the QoS a
Kenyan/CCK feature? Then it might be a
shakedown.
James
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Adam Nelson <adam@varud.com>
wrote:
This seems like a shakedown to me.
Everybody I know gets Safaricom if they can
afford it (otherwise Airtel). The market can handle
quality problems and the CCK can help by educating the local
markets (i.e. local radio spots discussing carrier quality
in each market).
--Kili.io -
OpenStack for Africa: kili.ioMusings: twitter.com/varud
About
Adam: www.linkedin.com/in/adamcnelson
On Thu, Jan 9,
2014 at 11:07 AM, Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
ICT secretary Fred Matiang’i has vowed to tie the renewal
of Safaricom’s licence to the voice quality checks that
show the mobile phone operator is non-compliant.
Dr Matiang’i said the government and the Communications
Commission of Kenya (CCK) will not negotiate on the voice
quality standards.
....
“I don’t understand why an operator would like to
negotiate a licence condition. There are only two options
here, either comply or step out of the business,” Dr
Matiang’i told the Business Daily on the sidelines of the
launch of the electronic filling of returns by insurers to
the Insurance Regulatory Authority.
Check more @
http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate-News/Safaricom-licence-terms/-/...
---
my comment? - Safaricom "ina weneyewe"
translation for the international viewers "Safaricom
has its owners" :-)
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
Unsubscribe or change your options at
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/adam%40varud.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions
interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The
network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth
and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect
people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't
flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam,
do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
Unsubscribe or change your options at
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jgmbugua%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions
interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The
network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth
and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect
people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't
flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam,
do not market your wares or qualifications.
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
Unsubscribe or change your options at
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions
interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The
network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth
and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect
people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame
or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do
not market your wares or qualifications.
-- ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya twitter.com/lordmwesh kenya.or.ke | The Kenya we know _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jgmbugua%40gmail.com The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/adam%40varud.com The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ggithaiga%40hotmail.co... The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.