Hi waudo, interconnection charges are at the core of the sender pays all telco model. What would replace it? In traditional Internet peering i give you roughly the same amount of traffic you give me on a settlement free basis. If one operator has 75% share, traffic patterns will be unlikely equivalent. How would you deal with that inequity? Rgds, mctim On 2/16/11, waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com> wrote:
MM/McTim - Sorry I disagree. Interconnection costs are just one component of off-net costs that are INDEPENDENT of other costs of the call. If I was an operator I do not understand why anyone would be interested in my cost structure or why I should give it out.
BTW I prefer a situation where even interconnection costs are phased out. Let it be like the banking model where the banks do not add the cost of clearing inter-bank cheques. The cross-traffic cancels itself out. That is, why should I charge you for clearing my 10 cheques and you charge me for clearing my 10 cheques?
Waudo
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:23 +0300, "muriuki mureithi" <mureithi@summitstrategies.co.ke> wrote:
Hi Waudo
Refereeing interconnection rates fundamentally assumes a cost structure otherwise the regulator would have no basis of setting and referring the interconnection rates
cheers
Muriuki Mureithi
Those who bring sunshine to the lives of others cannot keep it from themselves. Sir james m barrie
From: waudo siganga [mailto:emailsignet@mailcan.com] Sent: 16 February 2011 09:46 To: muriuki mureithi Cc: 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions' Subject: Re: [kictanet] Price Control in the Telecom Market in Kenya?
Hi MM - I think the role of CCK should end with refereeing inter-connection rates. Otherwise I do not think there is anything like "the price structure of a call". Operators have different business models, different competencies, different efficiencies, etc.
Waudo
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:33 +0300, "muriuki mureithi" <mureithi@summitstrategies.co.ke> wrote:
Edith you are not alone!
But unfortunately this is like a political debate--- the debate will be better informed if CCK which has the mandate can publish the price structure of a call taking into account our situation and the market dynamics . Certainly an operator who is innovative and brings down the ‘cost’ to for example below Ksh 0.50 should be encouraged and protected to price that way , those however charging below ‘cost’ should be shunned because , this business tactic is not overboard and it only takes a while when we have to pay dearly. CCK can and should help an informed debate and confirm if the ‘cost’ figures published by the media were accurate.
cheers
Muriuki Mureithi
Those who bring sunshine to the lives of others cannot keep it from themselves. Sir james m barrie
From: kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke@lists.kictanet.o r.ke [mailto:kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke@lists.ki ctanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of Edith Adera Sent: 15 February 2011 19:40 To: mureithi@summitstrategies.co.ke Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions Subject: [kictanet] Price Control in the Telecom Market in Kenya?
Listers,
The news I heard today made me wanna shadder!
A player with market power asking for price controls in the telecom market? Are we progressing or retrogressing?
Telecom Economics dictates otherwise and this must NOT happen in a free and competitive market! Our recent discussions on broadband access just goes to confirm that we are not there yet. We have not yet reached the most remote and isolated corners of this country....control MUST not be an option!
The Kenyan consumer continues to be constrained by availability, accessibility and affordability to fully realize the socio-economic benefits of telecoms.
As a voice for the common consumer.....among a million other voices......price control is NOT an option!
Edith
________________
Edith Ofwona Adera
Senior Program Specialist
ICT4D Program and Climate Change & Water Program
International Development Research Centre | Centre de recherches pour le développement international
Regional Office for Eastern and Southern Africa
Tel: +254202713160 | Fax/Téléc: +254202711063 | Skype: edithadera
[1]eadera@idrc.or.ke | [2]www.idrc.ca | [3]www.crdi.ca
Image removed by sender.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
This message was sent to: emailsignet@mailcan.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/ options/kictanet/emailsignet%40mailcan.com
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
This message was sent to: emailsignet@mailcan.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/ options/kictanet/emailsignet%40mailcan.com
References
1. mailto:eadera@idrc.or.ke 2. http://www.idrc.ca/ 3. http://www.crdi.ca/
-- Sent from my mobile device Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel