Adam good thoughts..especially****"If Safaricom can sell LTE to the 1% and that makes enough money to pay well for the spectrum license and GoK then uses that money for the USF to build 3G towers in rural areas - then that's really great".But then again Safcom is not a charity organisation and may rather pay out the profits to the shareholders (like me :-) rather than build extra 3G towers to remote non economic zones in Kenya.
then***"4G/LTE deployments aren't really that much more expensive than 3G as I understand it."I dont have the actual costs, but the fact is 4G/LTE base stations have a small footprint/radius compared to 3G, so you will require more base stations to cover larger areas/populations. More base stations more money hence the cost of service to the customer can only be higher.*** The big difference is the 'cost' of the spectrum - which is whatever the market will bear.actually cost of spectrum will be decided/or has been decided by the Regulator. But the point is, even if it was given away for free, or through trading there is no guarantee that the benefit will not be translated to the consumer.In summary, I guess my beef is not against the LTE technology( it is good, it is inevitable and it will be deployed). My point is that it will not address the high cost of communication and is not likely to address the bigger picture (getting everyone online).And yes, that is not Safaricom's problem but the Regulators problem.