Hi Grace,

Your compliments are noted.  We try our best to ensure all stakeholders are informed and involved too in our work.  

With respect to the coverage, we can share the full report which is also available on the website.  This can give you a better picture.  

As for the guidelines that inform the decision, the narrative gives the indication that the ICT Access Gaps Study carried out in 2016 provides scientific evidence of the coverage/gaps and therefore guides the prioritization of the projects to be funded under the USF framework.  So far it is only those two projects  that have been lined up for financing from the fund.  Other projects that you  have heard about like the 56 e-resource centre projects that we have undertaken in partnership with the Kenya National Library Services , etc, are funded from the budget of the Authority and not the USF.  

Hope this helps answer your queries.

Regards, 

Rachel 

From: kictanet <kictanet-bounces+alwala=ca.go.ke@lists.kictanet.or.ke> on behalf of KICTAnet Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Reply-To: KICTAnet Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Date: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 9:00 PM
To: Rachel <alwala@ca.go.ke>
Cc: Grace Mutung'u <nmutungu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Updates on the Operationalization of the Universal Service Fund

Dear Rachel, 
Thank you very much for this brief. We appreciate that the Authority is responsive to inquiries from the public. 
Three quick questions: 
Table 4 gives a summary of 2G and 3G coverage per county. In relation to the presentation that was made to the Senate Committee, I am trying to understand the specific areas that do not have any network coverage (2G or 3G). Is this information available? 
Secondly, what guidelines inform decisions on which areas to prioritise in implementing the Fund? 
Finally, other than the voice service project and Internet ready schools, are there any other projects that have been funded? 

Regards, 
Grace

2017-01-17 12:20 GMT+03:00 Barrack Otieno via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>:
Many thanks Rachel, this is great.

Regards

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Alwala, Rachel via kictanet
<kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
> Dear listers,
>
> Happy New Year to you all!
>
>  Following some enquiries, I thought it would be helpful to share an update
> of the operationalization of the Universal Service Fund.   All this
> information is  available for public consumption.  This gives an overview of
> the status of the country’s network connectivity and initiatives currently
> under implementation by Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) with respect
> to the Universal Service Fund (USF) projects.
>
>
>
> BACKGROUND
>
>
>
> The Kenya Information Communications Act 2009 (KICA 2009) and the Kenya
> Information and Communications Regulations 2010 (KICR US&A 2010) mandate the
> Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) to manage and administer the
> Universal Service Fund (USF). During the FY 2015/16, the Authority conducted
> an ICT Access Gaps study to identify ICT infrastructure and services gaps /
> high cost areas and estimate the appropriate financial subsidy amounts
> required from the Universal Service Fund (USF) to facilitate closing of the
> identified ICT gaps.
>
> The Authority in the FY 2015/16 undertook an ICT Access Gaps study to
> identify gaps / high cost areas and establish the subsidy amounts required
> from the Universal Service Fund (USF) to facilitate closing the voice and
> data services gaps.  This study findings were released in mid 2016.
>
>
>
> KEY FINDINGS OF THE ACCESS GAPS STUDY
>
>
>
> 1.1      2 G Coverage
>
> The study established that 94.4% of Kenyan population is covered by 2G
> leaving out only 5.6% of Kenyan population that has no access to voice
> communications services.  Only 164 out of a total of 7,149 sub-locations
> remain totally uncovered, while a further 418 have less than 50% of their
> populations covered by 2G.
>
>
>
> Table 1: Sub-location population 2G coverage
>
> Coverage
>
> 100%
>
>>90%
>
> 50% - 90%
>
> < 50%
>
> 0%
>
> Sub-locations
>
> 5,655
>
> 487
>
> 425
>
> 418
>
> 164
>
>
>
> 1.2      3G Broadband coverage
>
> 78% of the population in Kenya are covered by 3G.
>
> Table 2: Sub-location population 3G coverage
>
> Coverage
>
> 100%
>
>>90%
>
> 50% - 90%
>
> < 50%
>
> 0%
>
> Sub-locations
>
> 2,454
>
> 1,324
>
> 1,146
>
> 977
>
> 1,244
>
>
>
>
>
> 1.3      The Broadcasting Sector
>
> Kenya’s broadcasting market includes over 100 FM radio stations and around
> 40 digital Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) sites.
>
>
>
> Digital Terrestrial Television sites rollout.
>
> The digital signal currently covers 60 per cent of the Kenyan population.
> The signal is available in; Nairobi, Nakuru, Nyeri, Mombasa, Kisumu,Webuye,
> Eldoret, Malindi, Meru (Nyambene), Kisii, Kericho, Narok, Nyahururu, Embu,
> Kisii, Machakos, Murang’a, Naivasha, Nyeri, Webuye, Narok, Mbuinzau,
> Kapenguria, Wajir, Kitui, Lamu and Namanga.
>
>
>
>
>
> 1.4      Post and Courier Sector
>
> There are 623 post offices distributed across all counties as captured in
> Table 3.
>
>
>
> Table 3: Country wide distribution of Post Offices
>
> Administrative Level
>
> Total
>
> At least one PO present
>
> Penetration of post offices
>
> Min
>
> Average
>
> Max[1]
>
> County
>
> 47
>
> 47
>
> 2
>
> 13
>
> 55
>
> Constituency
>
> 295
>
> 264
>
> 0
>
> 2
>
> 14
>
> Ward
>
> 1,450
>
> 480
>
> 0
>
> 33%
>
> 10
>
> Sub-location
>
> 7,149
>
> 524
>
> 0
>
> 7%
>
> 7
>
>
>
> 1.5      Percentage 2G and 3G Network Coverage per County
>
>
>
> Table 4: Estimated 2G and 3G Network coverage by County
>
>
>
> County
>
> 2G (%)
>
> 3G (%)
>
> Baringo
>
> 87.7
>
> 49.1
>
> Bomet
>
> 99.8
>
> 97.7
>
> Bungoma
>
> 96.4
>
> 95.2
>
> Busia
>
> 99.1
>
> 95.4
>
> Elgeyo Marakwet
>
> 97.1
>
> 34.7
>
> Embu
>
> 99.6
>
> 88.3
>
> Garissa
>
> 58.1
>
> 4.6
>
> Homa Bay
>
> 97.8
>
> 87.6
>
> Isiolo
>
> 54.7
>
> 16.4
>
> Kajiado
>
> 74.4
>
> 38.9
>
> Kakamega
>
> 99.9
>
> 93.5
>
> Kericho
>
> 99.6
>
> 87.7
>
> Kiambu
>
> 99.8
>
> 98.3
>
> Kilifi
>
> 91.9
>
> 51.5
>
> Kirinyaga
>
> 100.0
>
> 98.5
>
> Kisii
>
> 99.9
>
> 90.2
>
> Kisumu
>
> 99.9
>
> 98.8
>
> Kitui
>
> 89.2
>
> 49.8
>
> Kwale
>
> 91.5
>
> 46.4
>
> Laikipia
>
> 90.8
>
> 48.9
>
> Lamu
>
> 82.4
>
> 34.4
>
> Machakos
>
> 99.9
>
> 73.0
>
> Makueni
>
> 99.6
>
> 68.7
>
> Mandera
>
> 66.9
>
> 9.4
>
> marsabit
>
> 56.6
>
> 25.2
>
> Meru
>
> 99.8
>
> 85.4
>
> Migori
>
> 99.1
>
> 69.5
>
> Mombasa
>
> 99.7
>
> 99.8
>
> Muranga
>
> 99.7
>
> 80.8
>
> Nairobi
>
> 100.0
>
> 99.9
>
> Nakuru
>
> 99.7
>
> 74.6
>
> Nandi
>
> 99.6
>
> 85.9
>
> Narok
>
> 86.7
>
> 29.9
>
> Nyamira
>
> 99.9
>
> 96.2
>
> Nyandarua
>
> 99.7
>
> 66.1
>
> Nyeri
>
> 99.8
>
> 86.5
>
> Samburu
>
> 55.5
>
> 14.0
>
> Siaya
>
> 99.6
>
> 94.5
>
> Taita-Taveta
>
> 96.4
>
> 43.4
>
> Tana River
>
> 85.8
>
> 12.8
>
> Tharaka Nithi
>
> 97.9
>
> 77.6
>
> Trans Nzoia
>
> 99.9
>
> 81.1
>
> Turkana
>
> 34.8
>
> 10.2
>
> Uasin Gishu
>
> 99.8
>
> 76.2
>
> Vihiga
>
> 99.9
>
> 99.0
>
> Wajir
>
> 48.2
>
> 8.4
>
> West pokot
>
> 69.0
>
> 13.3
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2.0        UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE ON CONNECTIVITY
>
>
>
> 2.1 USF PRIORITY PROJECTS AND PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION STATUS
>
> The ICTs Access Gaps study identified two priority projects namely;
>
>
>
> a)   ICT Infrastructure projects to address Voice services: Voice services
> make a large contribution to closing the remaining gaps. This will reduce
> the population coverage gap from 5.6% of the population to around half
> (2.8%) by 2018.
>
>
>
> ·      The Voice gap project were to be tendered as multiple bidding lots at
> the sub-location or ward level. The NFP (Tier 1) operators were to be
> invited to bid for as many or few of the Lots as interests them.
>
>
>
> b)   Education Broadband connectivity projects - Establish a first step
> towards addressing the critical national gap, which exists in connectivity
> of schools in Kenya.
>
>
>
> ·      The education broadband project was to be implemented through a
> framework of partnership with the Ministry of Education, Science and
> Technology. The tender for schools connectivity was to be implemented
> through competitive tendering process.
>
>
>
> ·      The above two USF priority projects shall be implemented under the
> accepted guidelines for USF, which stress on transparency and competitive
> bidding processes as per the procurement Laws in Kenya.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2.1.1     The Voice Service Projects and Implementation Status
>
> A total of 348 sub-locations were identified through the combined GIS and
> Access Gap Model methodology as the priority cases which best meet the
> critical performance criteria suited to “smart subsidies”, meaning that they
> will result in sustainable service provision in the gap areas.
>
> The total of sub-locations to be included in the USF competition reduces to
> 202 after consideration of operator licence obligations between 2016 and
> 2018.
>
> ·        Implementation Status /Achievements
>
> The Authority in August 2016 tendered for the Voice Infrastructure projects,
> which were structured into multiple bidding lots at the sub-location or ward
> level that yielded into 105 lots.
>
> Telecommunications Voice Infrastructure and Services Tender was a restricted
> Tender for Network Facility Providers (NFPs), Tier 1 operators licensed to
> provide GSM mobile services in Kenya.
>
> The Network Facility Providers (NFP, Tier 1) licensed operators were invited
> to bid for as many or few of the Lots as interests them. The Authority on
> 2nd  August shared the restricted tender document with the three NFP Tier 1
> licensees with tender closing date being 5th October 2016.
>
> The Authority held Pre-bidders conference on the 18th August 2016 attended
> by all the NFP Tier 1 operators. Tender evaluations commenced immediately
> after the closing on 5th October 2016.
>
>   Analysis of the USF Voice Project Bids
>
> The Table below shows the numeric results of the competition, indicating
> geographical area, populations and subsidy budget lots bidded and the
> subsidy amount awarded per bidder.
>
> Table 5: Results of the USF Bid Competition
>
>
>
> Lots
>
> Sub-locations
>
> Geog Area
>
> 000’s Km2
>
> Unserved population
>
> Subsidy
>
> Expected Budget
>
> Original Tender
>
> 105
>
> 202
>
> 45,304
>
> 697,971
>
> Max.
> 2.362 Bn
>
> 1.600 Bn
>
> Bid
>
> 37
>
> 86
>
> 29,906
>
> 389,778
>
> 1.458 Bn
>
>
>
> Awards
>
> 34
>
> 78
>
> 24,291
>
> 319,318
>
> Awards 1.245 Bn
>
> 1.245 Bn
>
> Percentage awarded
>
> 32.3%
>
> 38.6%
>
> 53. 6%
>
> 45.7%
>
> 52.7%
>
> 77.8%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Additional Lots bid but subject to clarification and finally rejected
>
> 2
>
> 7
>
> 5,615
>
> (12.4%)
>
> 70,460
>
> (10.1%)
>
> 0.293 Bn
>
> N/A
>
>
>
> Way Forward
>
> Out of the 105 lots, 37 lots (86 sub-locations) were bided for and 34 (78
> sub-locations) awarded for voice infrastructure development.
>
> Based on the awards, 38.6% of the targeted sub-locations will be reached,
> against the 60-70% projected in the Access Gap Report.
>
> The Authority intends to close the voice gaps in all sub-locations through a
> phased approached with the first batch of 78 sub-locations being contracted
> for infrastructure development in the current fiscal year.
>
>  The Authority noted that Operators generally targeted large service areas
> with heavy subsidies for several new towers rather than smaller areas
> requiring more complex network optimisation.
>
> The Authority is also planning to offer spectrum waivers to encourage roll
> out to the areas considered unattractive by the Mobile Network Operators.
>
> Summary of results
>
> The following graph shows the results on a county-by-county basis indicating
> tendered versus awarded numbers of sub-locations.
>
>
>
> It will be noted that the most successful in terms of targeted sub-locations
> versus awards made were Marsabit, Kwale and Bungoma (100%), followed by
> Wajir (63%) and Narok (57%).
>
>
>
> 2.1.2     Education Broadband Connectivity Projects and Implementation
> Status
>
> The ICT Access Gaps study identified a national gap in access to broadband
> connectivity for the education sector.
>
> In implementing the schools connectivity project, the Authority has
> partnered with the Ministry of Education Science and Technology (MoEST)
> through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to provide broadband
> connectivity to all secondary schools in Kenya.
>
> The first phase of the Education Broadband Connectivity project has been
> designed to provide 5Mbps dedicated Internet connectivity to 896 secondary
> schools identified by the Ministry of Education Science and Technology
> spread across all the 47 counties. The project targeted to connect up to
> 1,000 schools but MoEST provided only 896 secondary schools drawn from all
> the 47 counties in Kenya that met the Internet e-readiness criterion.
>
> Secondary schools designated as “Internet-ready: for the purposes of this
> project shall be those certified by MoEST as meeting the following criteria:
>
>                i.         Connected to the Grid / electricity;
>
>               ii.         A secured computer laboratory with working
> computers;
>
>             iii.         A qualified ICT / computer teacher;
>
>             iv.         Offering students the KCSE Computer studies
> curriculum and submission of students for KNEC examination at Form 4 in 2015
> and/or 2016.
>
> Implementation Status / Achievements
>
> The Authority advertised the Tender for the Education Broadband Connectivity
> Project. This was an “Open Tender” to all licensees contributing to the USF
> levy. The tender was grouped into 9 lots and the tender closed on 19th
> October 2016”. The tender has been awarded to three (3) bidders at total
> cost Kshs. 837 Million.
>
>
>
>
> Based on the data from the Ministry of Education Science and Technology
> (MoEST) Kenya has about 7000 secondary school.  The Authority is connecting
> 896 Secondary school to Broadband within the current financial year.
> Subsequently, the Universal Service Fund will be used to connect all the
> remaining secondary schools.
>
>
>
> STATUS OF 4G COVERAGE
>
>
>
> The Authority has issued LTE spectrum in the 800MHz on trial basis to the
> three (3) Mobile Network Operator i.e Safaricom Ltd in 2014, Airtel Ltd and
> Telkom Ltd in 2016.
>
>
>
> Safaricom Limited has so far rolled out the 4G network in the following five
> (5) major towns i.e Nairobi, Mombasa, Nakuru, Kisumu and Eldoret while the
> other two operators are preparing to commence their 4G network roll.
>
>
>
>
> Annex 1:  Voice Infrastructure Project – Financial Year 2016/17
>
> LOT
>
> COUNTY LOT NO.
>
> COUNTY
>
> WARD
>
> SUBLOCATION
>
> UNSERVED POP’N
>
> MAX. SUBSIDY (KSHS)
>
> B1
>
>
>
>
>
> B2
>
> 202
>
> 697,971
>
> 2,362.011
>
>
>
>
>
> 1
>
> BAR-3
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> MUKUTAN
>
> MUKUTANI
>
> 1,284
>
>     7.940
>
>
>
>
>
> 15,720,000
>
> BARINGO
>
> MUKUTAN
>
> ARABAL
>
> 1,471
>
> 2
>
> BAR-6
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> NGORON
>
> 1,501
>
>  18.139
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> KULAL
>
> 3,021
>
> 3
>
> BAR-7
>
>
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> LOKIS
>
> 2,445
>
>  15.720
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> NGAINA
>
> 2,516
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> MASOOL
>
> CHEPSERUM
>
> 1,386
>
> 8
>
> BUNG-1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> KORN'GOTUNY
>
> 1,886
>
>
>
> 17.763
>
>
>
> 17,762,999
>
> (13)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 17,763,000
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> CHEPKURKUR
>
> 3,285
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> EMIA
>
> 1,452
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> KUBURA
>
> 3,890
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> 5,467
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> KAIMUGUL
>
> 5,709
>
> 12
>
> GAR-7
>
> GARISSA
>
> GOREALE
>
> GOREALE
>
> 4,523
>
>     32.389
>
>
>
> 32,389,000
>
> 14
>
> GAR-2
>
> GARISSA
>
> SANGAILU
>
> HANDARO
>
> 5,102
>
>     24.120
>
> 24,119,999
>
>
>
> 18
>
> IS-3
>
> ISIOLO
>
> GARBATULLA
>
> MALKADAKA
>
> 3,632
>
> 24.860
>
> 24,859,999
>
> (16)
>
> 24,860,000
>
> 19
>
> IS-4
>
> ISIOLO
>
> KINNA
>
> KULAMAWE
>
> 3,532
>
> 28.595
>
> 28,594,999
>
> (4)
>
> 28,595,000
>
> 26
>
> KAJ-7
>
> KAJIADO
>
> KEEKONYOKIE
>
> KISAMIS
>
> 2,429
>
> 28.929
>
>
>
> 28,928,999
>
>
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MOSIRO
>
> EMBARBAL
>
> 2,429
>
> 29
>
> KAJ-10
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> ENDOINYO-OLASHO
>
> 1,728
>
> 43.669
>
>
>
> 41,485,549
>
>
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> OLOIKA
>
> 1,744
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> PAKASE
>
> 3,377
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> SHOMPOLE
>
> 2,085
>
> 30
>
> KIL-2
>
>
>
>
>
> KILIFI
>
> SOKOKE
>
> NDUGUMANI
>
> 1,123
>
> 7.169
>
>
>
> 7,168,999
>
>
>
> KILIFI
>
> SOKOKE
>
> MWANGEA
>
> 1,215
>
>
>
> KILIFI
>
> JILORE
>
> MKONDONI
>
> 1,572
>
>
>
> 33
>
> KIT-3
>
>
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> ENDAU/MALALANI
>
> MALALANI
>
> 2,136
>
> 55.354
>
>
>
>        55,353,999
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> ENDAU/MALALANI
>
> MAKUKA
>
> 2,033
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> NUU
>
> MALAWA
>
> 4,352
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> KANZIKO
>
> ILAMBA
>
> 1,467
>
>
>
>
>
> 37
>
> KIT-5
>
> KITUI
>
> NGOMENI
>
> KIMELA
>
> 2,161
>
> 12.222
>
> 12,221,999
>
>
>
> 38
>
> KW-1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> KWALE
>
> PUMA
>
> BUSA
>
> 7,323
>
> 123.377
>
>
>
>
>
> 123,377,000
>
> KWALE
>
> PUMA
>
> VIGURUNGANI
>
> 3,244
>
> KWALE
>
> NDAVAYA
>
> MWANDIMU
>
> 8,925
>
> KWALE
>
> MACKINON ROAD
>
> KILIBASI
>
> 1,139
>
> KWALE
>
> MWERENI
>
> KASEMENI
>
> 3,060
>
> KWALE
>
> MWERENI
>
> KILIMANGODO
>
> 10,848
>
> 41
>
> MAN-1
>
> MANDERA
>
> KOTULO
>
> EL RAMU
>
> 9,165
>
> 17.990
>
> 17,989,999
>
>
>
> 42
>
> MAN-2
>
>
>
> MANDERA
>
> KOTULO
>
> BORJI GARSE
>
> 3,525
>
> 15.212
>
>
>
> 15,211,999
>
>
>
> MANDERA
>
> KOTULO
>
> KUTAYU
>
> 3,447
>
>
>
> 44
>
> MAN-5
>
> MANDERA
>
> WARANKARA
>
> WARANKARA
>
> 9,387
>
> 13.200
>
> 13,199,999
>
>
>
> 47
>
> MAN-4
>
> MANDERA
>
> TAKABA SOUTH
>
> WANGAI DAHAN
>
> 10,763
>
> 16.760
>
> 15,921,999
>
>
>
> 48
>
> MARS-2
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> SCHEME
>
> 1,530
>
> 33.111
>
>
>
> 33,110,999
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> KARARE
>
> 2,576
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> SONGA
>
> 1,084
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> KITURUNI
>
> 1,230
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> SAGANTE/ JALDESA
>
> BADASA
>
> 1,204
>
>
>
> 49
>
> MARS-3
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> DUKANA
>
> BALESA
>
> 4,661
>
> 48.554
>
>
>
> 48,553,999
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> DUKANA
>
> EL-HADI
>
> 3,051
>
>
>
> 50
>
> MARS-1
>
>
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> LAISAMIS
>
> NDIKIR
>
> 1,814
>
> 65.669
>
>
>
>
>
> 65,669,000
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KORR/NGURUNIT
>
> NGURUNIT
>
> 3,728
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KORR/NGURUNIT
>
> LONYORI PICHAU
>
> 3,015
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NDOTO
>
> ILLAU
>
> 1,017
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NDOTO
>
> NGURUNIT
>
> 1,611
>
> 53
>
> NAR-3
>
> NAROK
>
> MAJI MOTO/ NAROOSURA
>
> MAJI-MOTO
>
> 1,251
>
> 9.145
>
> 9,144,999
>
>
>
> 54
>
> NAR-4
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> MAJI MOTO/ NAROOSURA
>
> ELANGATA ENTERIT
>
> 3,831
>
> 25.722
>
> 25,721,999
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> MAJI MOTO/ NAROOSURA
>
> ENKUTOTO
>
> 4,568
>
>
>
> 57
>
> NAR-7
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> OLNGARUA
>
> 1,499
>
> 69.787
>
>
>
> 69,786,999
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> OLORTE
>
> 3,114
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> MAUSA
>
> 3,575
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> ENTASEKERA
>
> 3,231
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> OLMESUTIE
>
> 2,031
>
>
>
> 62
>
> SAM-4
>
>
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NYIRO
>
> LONJORIN
>
> 2,164
>
> 22.229
>
>
>
> 22,228,999
>
>
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NYIRO
>
> LKAYO
>
> 3,581
>
>
>
> 68
>
> TKN-7
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KERIO DELTA
>
> NAKURIO
>
> 9,426
>
> 56.435
>
>
>
> 56,434,999
>
> (9)
>
> 56,435,000
>
> TURKANA
>
> KERIO DELTA
>
> NAKORET
>
> 5,155
>
> 70
>
> TKN-11
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOIMA
>
> PUCH
>
> 12,002
>
> 59.938
>
> 59,937,999
>
> (14%Coverage)
>
>
>
> Rejected
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 72
>
> TKN-12
>
> TURKANA
>
> TURKWEL
>
> KAPUS
>
> 8,320
>
> 26.167
>
>
>
> 26,167,000
>
> 73
>
> TKN-9
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KOTARUK/LOBEI
>
> NAIPA
>
> 4,207
>
> 19.160
>
>
>
>
>
> 19,160,000
>
> TURKANA
>
> KOTARUK/LOBEI
>
> LOKIPETOT ARENGAN
>
> 4,861
>
>
>
> 75
>
> TKN-19
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KIBISH
>
> KARACH 1
>
> 5,502
>
> 29.603
>
>
>
> 29,602,999
>
> (26% Coverage)
>
> Rejected
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KIBISH
>
> KAITEDE
>
> 6,333
>
> 76
>
> TKN-13
>
> TURKANA
>
> LETEA
>
> LOKIPOTO
>
> 18,956
>
> 18.451
>
> 18,450,999
>
> (61% Coverage)
>
> Rejected
>
>
>
> 79
>
> TKN-17
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOPUR
>
> LOPUSIKI
>
> 3,947
>
> 104.377
>
>
>
> 104,376,999
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> SONGOT
>
> LOKUDULE
>
> 3,216
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> SONGOT
>
> LOKANGAE
>
> 11,599
>
>
>
> 81
>
> TKN-2
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOKORI/KOCHODIN
>
> KANGITIT
>
> 4,794
>
> 81.124
>
>
>
> 81,123,999
>
> (67% coverage)
>
> Clarification
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOKORI/KOCHODIN
>
> LOTUBAE
>
> 22,129
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KAPEDO/NAPEITOM
>
> NGILUKIA
>
> 4,356
>
>
>
> 82
>
> TKN-4
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KATILIA
>
> KATILIA
>
> 9,513
>
> 223.315
>
>
>
> 212,149,249
>
> (60% coverage)
>
> Clarification
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KATILIA
>
> PARKATI
>
> 11,455
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KALAPATA
>
> KALAPATA
>
> 10,869
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KALAPATA
>
> LOPEROT
>
> 7,344
>
>
>
> 84
>
> TKN-1
>
> TURKANA
>
> KAPEDO/NAPEITOM
>
> NADOME
>
> 3,653
>
> 24.684
>
> 24,683,999
>
>
>
> 85
>
> TKN-6
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOKICHAR
>
> NAPOSUMURU
>
> 6,034
>
> 25.6
>
>
>
> 25,600,000
>
> 87
>
> WAJ-6
>
> WAJIR
>
> BATALU
>
> BUNA
>
> 3,465
>
> 51.493
>
>
> 51,492,999
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> BATALU
>
> KUROW
>
> 3,129
>
>
> 89
>
> WAJ-2
>
> WAJIR
>
> KHOROF/HARAR
>
> RIBA
>
> 11,042
>
> 50.496
>
> 47,971,199
>
>
>
> 91
>
> WAJ-5
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> ELBEN
>
> MANSA
>
> 12,247
>
> 87.429
>
>
>
> 87,428,999
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> SARMAN
>
> DUNTO
>
> 10,733
>
>
>
> 92
>
> WAJ-4
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> ELDAS
>
> KILKILEY
>
> 4,107
>
> 47.673
>
>
>
> 47,672,999
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> ELNUR/TULA TULA
>
> LAKOLE
>
> 9,066
>
>
>
> 98
>
> WPOK-6
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> CHEPARERIA
>
> SHALPOGH
>
> 4,248
>
> 5.841
>
>
> 5,841,000
>
>
> 99
>
> WPOK-11
>
>
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> ALALE
>
> APUKE
>
> 1,442
>
> 24.696
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> KIWAWA
>
> LOPET
>
> 2,300
>
>
>
>
>
> TOTAL
>
> 1,182,081,961
>
> 385,141,000
>
>
>
>
> Annex 2:  Counties and number of Internet-ready Schools to be connected in
> 2016/17
>
> Lotting of the Counties and number of Internet-ready Schools
>
> Lot 1:
>
> Lot 2:
>
> Lot 3:
>
> Lot 4:
>
> Lot 5:
>
> Lot 6:
>
> Lot 7:
>
> Lot 8:
>
> Lot 9:
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> Garissa
>
> 3
>
> Mandera
>
> 7
>
> Wajir
>
> 4
>
> Samburu
>
> 3
>
> Marsabit
>
> 4
>
> Turkana
>
> 4
>
> W. Pokot
>
> 7
>
> Baringo
>
> 10
>
> Narok
>
> 10
>
> Tana River
>
> 2
>
> Nairobi
>
> 39
>
> Isiolo
>
> 4
>
> Laikipia
>
> 11
>
> Meru
>
>   19
>
> Elegeo Marakwet
>
> 10
>
> Trans-Nzoia
>
> 18
>
> Kericho
>
> 21
>
> Migori
>
> 11
>
> Lamu
>
> 5
>
> Murang'a
>
> 35
>
> Tharaka Nithi
>
> 14
>
> Nyandarua
>
> 5
>
> Embu
>
> 24
>
> Uasin Gishu
>
> 17
>
> Bungoma
>
> 54
>
> Kisumu
>
> 23
>
> Homa Bay
>
> 15
>
> Kilifi
>
> 13
>
> Kajiado
>
> 8
>
> Kitui
>
> 31
>
> Nakuru
>
> 35
>
> Nyeri
>
> 29
>
> Kakamega
>
> 55
>
> Busia
>
> 24
>
> Vihiga
>
> 20
>
> Siaya
>
> 24
>
> Mombasa
>
> 12
>
>
>
>
>
> Makueni
>
> 26
>
> Kiambu
>
> 45
>
> Kirinyaga
>
> 22
>
> Nandi
>
>   28
>
>
>
>
>
> Bomet
>
> 10
>
> Kisii
>
> 24
>
> Kwale
>
> 7
>
>
>
>
>
> Taita. Taveta
>
> 14
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nyamira
>
> 20
>
> Machakos
>
> 69
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sub-total
>
> 111
>
>
>
> 89
>
>
>
> 93
>
>
>
> 99
>
>
>
> 99
>
>
>
> 114
>
>
>
> 103
>
>
>
> 84
>
>
>
> 104
>
> TOTAL NO.
>
> SCHOOLS
>
> 896
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Rachel Alwala
> Assistant Director/Communications and External Affairs
> Communications Authority of Kenya
> PO Box 14448
> Nairobi 00800
>
> Tel:  +254 703042000
> Email:  alwala@ca.go.ke
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for
> people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.



--
Barrack O. Otieno
+254721325277
+254733206359
Skype: barrack.otieno
PGP ID: 0x2611D86A

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.



--
Grace L.N. Mutung'u
Skype: gracebomu
Twitter: @Bomu

<http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/profile/GraceMutungu>

PGP ID : 0x33A3450F