Alice, Obviously, they (ICANN) were looking at the plenipotentiary meeting (still ongoing now) when they wrote this speech for the NBO meeting. Two related posts by Kieren McCarthy at GIBC can be seen as a follow up to your "Plutocrats and the Internet" post a few days ago. http://gibc.biz/2010/10/itu-election-results/ longish, but a good read in its IG dimension. http://gibc.biz/2010/10/us-government-misplaced-concerns/ "What’s on the table? A common proposals document put forward by the Arab States, for example, contains one proposal – by the representative of Syria – that argues “the current domain name system does not fully reflect the diverse and growing language needs of all users because the supervisory entity, ICANN, an American corporation, is subject under its agreement with the United States government, represented by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), to the laws and jurisdiction of the United States of America”. It calls for the government body within ICANN (the Governmental Advisory Committee, or GAC) to be given oversight powers of ICANN, “such that the latter becomes subject to GAC decisions”. And it suggests that GAC is reformed along the same lines as the ITU Council." I just don't see how the ITU is going to get their way in any of this. I for one would love to see the ITU help their members deploy IPv6 on their networks (for example) instead of trying to grab a chunk of IPv6 for themselves to pass out to their members as a nice little revenue generator. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:45 PM, alice <alice@apc.org> wrote:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/icann-head-warns-against-putt...
Alexander Dziadosz
Cairo — Reuters Published on Tuesday, May. 25, 2010 8:00AM EDT
The head of the U.S.-monitored organization in charge of assigning global internet addresses such as .com and .net has cautioned against proposals to put the group under UN or other international control.
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), at the heart of global debate over who should run the Internet, is the closest thing the vast system of intertwined computer networks has to any central authority.
Countries such as Iran and Brazil have argued ICANN, which was founded in 1998 under the aegis of the U.S. Department of Commerce and still reports partly to the U.S. government, should cede its authority to a global body such as the United Nations.
“If you think of that rate, or pace, in technology, it’s just a lot more rapid than most traditional forms of policy development would be suited to,” Rod Beckstrom, the organisation’s chief executive, told Reuters on Monday.
Multilateral state control could make ICANN less nimble, he said, and therefore less likely to quickly develop technologies like Arabic-language domain names that feed rapidly expanding Internet demand.
“It’s hard to imagine any replacement for (the current system), and I feel I can say that somewhat objectively because I’ve worked for government as well,” he said, adding such a decision would be up to ICANN’s board of directors.
Still, the U.S. government last September agreed to changes that meant ICANN would no longer report solely to the United States, part of a push to give global constituents more say.
The agreement set up an international review team to monitor ICANN’s performance and it is due to issue initial recommendations at the end of the year. The deal also included guidelines aimed at making the group more transparent.
In 2003 a group of nations suggested ICANN come under the authority of the International Telecommunication Union, a UN agency, but that move stumbled on the view that the private sector is better able to run the Internet’s addressing system.
A contract that gives ICANN authority over much of the Internet’s basic plumbing, such as allocating Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, is up for review next year.
Mr. Beckstrom was in Cairo after Egypt became one of the first countries to win approval to use Arabic script on its national domain name, the last part of the address after the dot. ICANN approved use of non-Latin scripts in October.
Egypt said this month it had launched the first domain name using Arabic letters under the name .misr – the Arabic word for Egypt, which is spelt in Arabic script.
Countries including China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have so far won ICANN approval to use their national language scripts on the top-level domain.
ICANN is now on track to broaden the non-Latin script, top-level domain names that are available into generic names such as .org, Beckstrom said.
“Of course you know .com and .net. Those are English language names that are shortened, basically. Where’s the equivalent of that in Arabic?” he said. He said ICANN might be able to introduce generic domain names in international scripts by the end of this year, but the approval process made dates hard to forecast.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
This message was sent to: dogwallah@gmail.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/dogwallah%40gmail.com