On 2/13/08, Wainaina Mungai <wainaina.mungai@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks Farida,

We should not consider the presence of lessos in ballot boxes in Kajiado or Kamukunji as evidence that your story was true. The pre-marking or ballots and the lesso story are what would be considered mutually exclusive events. The use of lessos as indicator of accuracy is at the very least speculative. The fact that [it is possible] for an election to be stolen does not mean that and election [will be] stolen.

For KTN/Standard, the more direct issues as you vouch for the integrity of your story would be:

1. Did you have [evidence] that the ballot boxes were stuffed with pre-marked ballot papers? or were you speculating because someone came forward as a "witness"?

2. Do you believe that the killings of the Administration Police in Nyanza were a direct result of the story you authorised? If so, what have you done to at least console the families of the bereaved policemen?

3. Did you have evidence that the Citi Hoppa buses that were carrying APs to various parts of the country were meant to be used for a rigging mission? and would you consider that your story was responsible for the burning of Citi Hoppa buses?

Most voters know that ballot boxes are checked before the start of voting and sealed infront of witnesses (agents, ECK officials etc). It is therefore unlikely that rigging would only take place is unless there is an elaborate conspiracy involving [all] officials/agents at a polling station.

Overall, the "vibes" KTN/Standard fraternity must contend with is not that they are a model of "free press" but that it is biased against the government or pro-ODM. The vibes stations such as Royal Media, Kameme and KBC contend with is that they have given Kenyans reason to be seen as pro-government/PNU. Those are the issues the press must address honestly and not hide behind tags and clichés such as 'press freedom' and 'muzzling the press'.

NOTE: I work for a competing media house but that is not my motivation for the issues i have raised on KTN/Standard. I respect journalists for the effort that goes into writing even the simplest story. However, I am aware that media houses and journalists have continued to allow their political and other biases to influence the way they report stories.

Wainaina

On Feb 14, 2008 12:09 AM, Farida Karoney <fkaroney@ktnkenya.com> wrote:

Wainaina

I personally authorised the story you are blaming KTN for and can vouch for the integrity of that report any time. If indeed you believe it is not possible to steal an election, how come that ballot boxes were found with lessos, and election materials in some polling stations?

We cannot resolve explosive issues by hiding or supressing the truth, and no one is trying to exonerate the press. Let us not pretend that we do not know why we are where we are, it is definately not because of KTN or the Standard Group.

And it is certainly not an academic excercise, afterall most of us do not have another place to call home except Kenya. Believe me, any Country which calls itself democratic must be able to live with a free press, no matter how much of a nuisance it is.

By all means industry players need mechanisms to promote responsible behaviour in the media but aggression against media houses in light of the current political crisis is in my opinion misplaced.

regards

Farida

----- Original Message -----

From: Wainaina Mungai

To: fkaroney@ktnkenya.com

Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:53 PM

Subject: Re: [kictanet] Kenya: The Media is Not Innocent

Like Dorcas, I am not surprised that the media has for the umpteenth time, failed to take responsibility for their role. Allow me to cut to the chase on how the media fueled the conflict.

The issue of "self regulation" has come up as journalists remind us how effective they were during the election period. I would like to know what the Media Council would say about KTN/Standard Group having published and aired sensational stories of a very unlikely vote rigging two or so days before the election day. Editors must have known that it is no longer possible to stuff ballot boxes prior to the voting day and get away with it. That unsubstantiated story led to the death of five Administrative Policemen. How would KTN/Standard Group justify the deaths of the APs especially because the accuracy of that rigging story was in doubt from the very moment it landed on the desk of the KTN/Standard Editor. The "messenger" must have known that the story was, other than being inaccurate, likely to ignite an explosive political confrontation. There are many other examples.

The fact that politicians, ECK or church leaders may be guilty does not exonerate the Press so the issue of "not working in isolation" or being a powerless "messenger" does not arise. Hundreds of people have been killed, hundreds of thousands more are now homeless and property worth millions has been destroyed. The wounds inflicted on my country will take decades to heal.

This is no longer an academic debate about Press Freedom or self regulation.

Wainaina

On Feb 13, 2008 3:59 AM, Farida Karoney <fkaroney@ktnkenya.com> wrote:

Guys,

Pardon me for joining the discussion rather late in the day. I do not think
that blanket condemnation of the media is useful in moving the Country
forward.

I do agree with Kanja that we need to audit all the players in order to
establish where the rain started beating us. More importantly, we need to
ask ourselves as groups and as individuals what we can do so that our
Country can never again find itself in such a bind.

As a practising journalist and an editor, I can confirm that the mainstream
media did alot in the way of self regulation. Many of the things that were
available to us yet were never aired nor printed are indeed shocking.

Let us not be quick to condemn the messenger.
I think that by now, we all know that there are issues much deeper that the
disputed presidential elections which the Country needs to address in a
wholesome manner

regards
Farida

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kanja Waruru" <kanjawaruru@yahoo.com>
To: <fkaroney@ktnkenya.com>
Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Kenya: The Media is Not Innocent

Hi,
Please allow me to comment on this matter and
apologize for dragging you back to an issue that had
been posted and quickly dismissed.

The media did not operate in isolation during and
after the elections. And before we point fingers at
the media and blame it for everything under the sun,
perhaps we should first try to understand who the real
players were in the elections and the general genesis
of the crises. And in doing so we may need to ask
ourselves these questions.

What role did politicians play in this crises?
What about the churches and mosques?
What about the security forces?
What about the Electoral Commission?
And finally what role did the media play?

My view is that we need to have a task force as
suggested by the minister of information probably
under the media council of Kenya to audit all these
players, only then can we truly say who was innocent
and who was guilty.

But i would also like to bring in another issue.
During the elections the media was exercising the self
regulation rule and a lot of the stories that were
filed during this period were censored because they
were hate speeches and issues not fit for printing but
we thought it would all die out after the elections
and things would also get back to normal.

Now on hindsight we ask ourselves should we have
censored those stories or should we have reported them
as presented?

i will be happy to hear your views the above.
cheers.
Kanja

--- alice <alice@apc.org> wrote:

> http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/nota.asp?idnews=41049
>
> KENYA:
> The Media Is Not Innocent
> Kwamboka Oyaro
>
> *NAIROBI, Feb 2 (IPS) - The media was partly blamed
> for the Rwandan
> genocide 14 years ago which left nearly one million
> people dead in 100
> days. "Kill the Inkotanyi [cockroaches]!" a local
> radio station urged
> its listeners at the time. *
>
> "30 Days in Words and Pictures: Media Response in
> Kenya During the
> Election Crisis" -- a workshop organised here last
> week by
> California-based media advocacy group Internews --
> enabled media
> professionals to conduct a "self-audit" of the role
> local media played
> in the post-election violence. The audit revealed
> that media --
> especially vernacular radio stations -- might be
> partly to blame for the
> on-going violence sparked off by the announcement of
> Mwai Kibaki as
> winner of the Dec. 27 elections.
>
> The violence has reportedly claimed over 1,000 lives
> and displaced some
> 250,000 people since the December election.
>
> David Ochami, a commissioner with the Media Council
> of Kenya, told IPS
> that long before the elections were held, vernacular
> radio stations had
> ignited ethnic consciousness among the listeners
> "making them support
> leaders from their own tribe and harbour bad
> feelings about people from
> other communities."
>
> "The ethnic hate our radio station was propagating
> about those from
> outside the community was unbelievable. I can't
> repeat any of those
> expressions at this forum," said a journalist with a
> vernacular radio
> station. "The unfortunate thing is we let these
> callers speak vile and
> laughed about it."
>
> "We took sides in the issue and we became
> subjective, forgetting our
> professional tenet of objectivity and neutrality. In
> fact, this
> polarization was so bad in the newsrooms that some
> broadcast journalists
> refused to cover or read news that wasn't favourable
> to the candidate or
> party they supported," said a journalist.
>
> In fact, leading up to the elections the local media
> conveyed
> inflammatory campaign messages as advertisers'
> announcements.
>
> "Both print and broadcast media put money ahead of
> responsibility by
> accepting and conveying paid-for hate material,"
> Mildred Baraza, a
> Nairobi- based journalist told IPS. "This could have
> incited the
> audience, and when they got a chance they avenged as
> a result of the
> pre-election messages," she said.
>
> Redemtor Atieno, another Nairobi-based journalist
> who also helped to
> organise the workshop, is confident that the media's
> biased reporting
> contributed to the mayhem in the country.
>
> "Professionalism was thrown to the dogs as tribe and
> partisanship
> carried the day. We failed our audience by conveying
> interests of
> politicians without questioning the impact of our
> stories," Atieno told
> IPS.
>
> Participants at the workshop also blamed media
> owners for playing a
> major role in encouraging the violence. "They had
> vested interests in
> either camp of the political divide," a reporter
> with Kenya Broadcasting
> Corporation (KBC) said, adding that he and his
> colleagues wanted to tell
> the real story but they couldn't because the stories
> could portray the
> government in a bad light.
>
> "We had beautiful clips and stories from the field,
> but we went back to
> the newsroom knowing that the story would never be
> used," he said.
>
> Even privately owned media owners who backed
> different political parties
> had a hand in the stories that were carried. If it
> was about the party
> they supported, they exaggerated the story and
> generally depicted the
> opponents in negative ways.
>
> "The media organizations refrained from telling the
> world the truth
> about what was happening," Ochami told IPS. "There
> has been a tendency
> of portraying the Kenyan crisis as a problem between
> two ethnic groups
> -- where one [Kibaki's Kikuyu] is victimized by
> another [opposition
> leader Raila Odinga's Luo]. Any other story on the
> contrary is
> downplayed or ignored," Ochami explained.
>
> There are those who believe the media is innocent
> and the violence
> currently rocking the country was bound to happen
> anyway -- that
> historical economic inequalities among the Kenyan
> communities had to
> boil over at some point in time.
>
> "The public vented long bottled-up anger. It was
> meant to explode
> whether the media encouraged it or not," said a
> journalist at the
> workshop. "Many people voted last year for change
> and it was a protest
> vote against years of inequalities. When they
> realized this would not
> happen when Kibaki was declared winner, they
> exploded."
>
> Mitch Odera the moderator of the workshop and media
> consultant said one
> of the causes of Kenya's unrest is the immaturity of
> its democracy.
> "There hasn't been competitive democracy in our
> country. That is our
> problem," Odera told the participants at the
> workshop.
>
> The government was also blamed for the chaos because
> it slapped a
> blanket ban on live broadcasters soon after violence
> broke out in the
> country.
>
> "The ban did not extend to international media
> including the Internet
> which many Kenyans accessed and spread the word.
> This led to skewed
> information and hence panic and more destruction and
> deaths," said one
> journalist from the electronic media.
>
> The Editors Guild -- an organization of editors from
> all media
> organizations -- went to court this week to
> challenge the ban on
> broadcasters.
>
> Participants at the workshop also heard the first
> hand experiences of
> journalists who covered the post election violence.
> Practioners
> complained about threats to their lives and
> complained that they felt
> segregated from the rest of the country.
>
> As the workshop was taking place participants were
> well aware that
> several political writers and analysts had received
> death threats for
> writing stories that were viewed as unfavourable
> towards the government.
>
> (END/2008)
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
>
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> This message was sent to: kanjawaruru@yahoo.com
>
=== message truncated ===

____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: fkaroney@ktnkenya.com

Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/fkaroney%40ktnkenya.com

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: wainaina.mungai@gmail.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/wainaina.mungai%40gmail.com

--

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: fkaroney@ktnkenya.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/fkaroney%40ktnkenya.com

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: wainaina@madeinkenya.org
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/wainaina%40madeinkenya.org