Victor,
In response to your first point on IPV6, I would not be so worried about another "y2k" like scenario resulting from the switch to IPv6 because its my understanding that the technology behind IPv6 has been tested under what was IPv5. In addition, please note that some of the vendors have their software supporting both IPv4 and IPv6 simultenously to ensure seamless transition.
Regarding, who should be worried, you are very right in that the end user should not be worried about implementation but its for the vendors themselves who should ensure that their products support IPv6.
However, some end users might experience problems adopting IPv6 due to problems including but not limited to: Absence or lack of manufacturer support or impossible software update.
 
Regards,
Evans

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Victor Gathara <v-gathara@dfid.gov.uk> wrote:
1) IPV6: I fear another 'y2k' bug scenario here - much ado about
nothing...Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this a problem for the big
boys (n girls:) who sell us the devices, operating systems and
applications? Why should I be worried if I 'upgrade' or 'patch' my
system regularly...and if I'm still running Win 3.1 (or the linux
equivalent) then I must not need the net...
2) .KE namespace: I think the issue here is how competent CCK is to
manage the namespace. Someone has to do it. And I guess the custodian of
what is for our collective good (read government) is the reasonable
choice. Legislation should be clear on under what circumstances CCK can
act (or not) on .KE. Is it?

Victor

-----Original Message-----
From: kictanet-bounces+v-gathara=dfid.gov.uk@lists.kictanet.or.ke
[mailto:kictanet-bounces+v-gathara=dfid.gov.uk@lists.kictanet.or.ke] On
Behalf Of John Walubengo
Sent: 30 April 2009 08:24
To: Victor Gathara
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
Subject: [kictanet] IG Discussions- Day 4 of 10: Critical Internet
Resources,IPv6, TLDs


I wish to thank all the previous contributors and remind Listers that
they can still contribute belatedly on previous themes - as long as they
pick the corresponding/correct subject lines.

Otherwise getting onto today's theme -IPv6 & Country code Top Level
Domain (ccTLD) Management.

Just some brief background:
1) IPv6: is the new protocol (procedure,standard) for any device (PC,
phone, server, camera, etc) communicating over the internet. The old
protocol IPv4 is set to reach its limit within 2-3yrs. The prominent
item with these protocols is a unique number allocated to each device
that wishes to communicate over the internet.  These numbers for IPv4
are getting depleted and will be exhausted by 2011/12/13 depending on
which scientists you subscribe to.

Issue: Put in bread and butter terms, if your organisation wanted to
extend internet communication to your new branch in 2011/12/13, most
likely you will not succeed unless the Kenyan social and technostructure
was ready for the IPv6 transistion. How ready are we in terms of
technical know-how to transit devices, networks, applications, users,
etc onto the new IPv6 platform? In particular what is the Kenyan status
on this issue? Whose monkey is it to make us ready for the transistion
and how far are they in terms of IPv6-readiness? Or should we just
relax, sit back and wait for 2011?

2)Top Level Domain: Each countries is reserved with an internet name
(.KE for Kenya, .UG for Uganda, etc) which by extension covers
corresponding sub-domains such as xyz.co.ke, xyz.ac.ke, xyz.or.ke, etc.
How this is managed varies accross countries. Indeed in Uganda, the .UG
namespace was created and managed by some private individual (hope this
has changed). In Kenya, the top level domain name, .KE is managed by
KENIC, www.kenic.or.ke, under a Public-Private Partnership.

Issue: Apparently the management of the Kenyan .KE namespace is set to
change - actually has changed - according to the recently enacted Kenya
Communication Amendment Act (KCA Act 2008).  The .KE namespace will now
be exclusively managed by the Regulator, CCK. Is this good or bad for
the internet community? Again, putting it in bread and butter terms, how
would you like the idea that your e.g. www.nation.co.ke site is alive
but could be disabled by our legally Independent Regulator?
We have only 1day on this - tomorrow we move onto the National IXP
infrasture theme. Floor is open for comments, clarification, corrections
and opinions.

walu.










_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: v-gathara@dfid.gov.uk Unsubscribe or change
your options at
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/v-gathara%40dfid.go
v.uk

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

DFID, the Department for International Development: leading the British Government's fight against world poverty. Find out more about the major global poverty challenges and get the facts on what DFID is doing to fight them: http://www.dfid.gov.uk
______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Peapod. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.peapod.co.uk/cleanmail

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: ifani.kinos@gmail.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ifani.kinos%40gmail.com