I think it will be more helpful if someone gave the exact details of the problems he/she is having regarding the KIXP. Eg. I am connected to provider X, and when I try to access content hosted by provider Y locally, it goes via the international route, and here are the traceroute/ping statistics. That way, it will be quite easy to pinpoint the problem and advise the affected member. Thaba On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:10 PM, McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:01 PM, lordmwesh <lordmwesh@gmail.com> wrote:
Robert, hold your praises on TESPOK.
Even after praising Fiona, and all the Tespok crew, i dont think they are very genuine, or keen to embrace single players into the IXP. We have had so many forums, especially IGFs, and other Kictanet moderated forums, and at no single point have we seen the 'grave isssues' raised by FIONA appear in the public domain.
At every forum I have attended, the KIXP folk have made it a point to bring up the licensing issue.
Is somebody playing PR?
What would be the modalities of establishing a parallel IXP for private content providers, who can then peer with KIXP
You can't peer with KIXP, you peer with others at KIXP.
IIUC, if you get a Content Providers license, then you can join the peering mesh.
-- Cheers,
McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
This message was sent to: dthaba@gmail.com Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/dthaba%40gmail.com