Good morning Good People This is day five of our discussion on Aligning records management with ICT e-government and Freedom of Information in East Africa, a study conducted by International Records Management Trust (IRMT) and supported by IDRC . The study covered five Eastern African Countries namely Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Burundi and Tanzania Today, we still focus on the second theme namely: Electronic Records and Citizens. This will be our focus also for tomorrow (Wednesday). Under this theme, three issues were identified and today we look at the second issue namely that Judicial Processes are Affected by the Failure to Address Records Management Requirements Consider this: · Have poor keeping of hard copies resulted in delays in the judicial process? · Is the keeping of electronic records going to reduce these delays? · Is information lost when digitization is taking place? · How best can the electronic records be managed to ensure their effective use? Question What steps could be taken to ensure records management inputs to computerization and digitization projects in the courts? Looking forward to more contributions today. Rgds Grace ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have the strength to survive, you have the power to succeed. Life is all about choices we make depending upon the situation we are in. Go forth and rule the World! Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:18:23 +0100 From: ngethe.kariuki2007@yahoo.co.uk Subject: Re: [kictanet] Day 4: e-Discussion on Aligning records management with ICT e-government and Freedom of Information in East Africa/ Where are you Listers? To: ggithaiga@hotmail.com Dear Grace, Listers, Just for information. 1. In the case of Kenya The Evidence Act,Cap.80 was amended vide CAP411A, to include electronic records and PART VII-ELECTRONIC RECORDS was added in Chapter III. of CAP80. 2. Going forward, there will be need for FOI and Data Protection legislation, the latter being critical in ensuring that personal data held by authorities is accurate and that the data subject right to correct erroneous information is upheld. John Kariuki