From a technical PoV, I empathize with FB, Google et.al. You have millions or photos, videos being uploaded by the minute and based on their policy, you need to ensure that these digital content meets that criteria.
No way human beings can keep up with that, you've got to use algorithms. And considering the no of false positives we get, which is very few, they're quite good then.
Then you have the problem of 'Context'.... This is one of the hardest areas in computing to figure out. And inevitably, that's what leads the algorithm to mark that photo as inappropriate because of nudity, since the algorithm didn't have the historical context
of that photo.
Fast forward to attending the Turkana festival, where a lot of the local women will be topless. Upload those pictures on FB, FB most likely refuses to accept them because of the nudity, you make noise as we unfortunately expect FB to start understanding culture!
Such corner cases in Computing are a nightmare to solve, but fortunately, solving those nightmares is what leads to Turing Awards!
Listers
The fact that Facebook finally reversed its decisions is commendable. And should be applauded. However, as Tony indicated it raises more questions than answers.
1. Should the most important and powerful Super Editor the world has ever seen be an algorithm or be influenced by Machine Learning?
2. If so at what point should human intervention be built in?
3. Even with human intervention we see that both Google and Facebook (rightly or wrongly) have been accused of certain biases. How do companies with such immense powers to influence our daily lives tamper their powers to ensure
'fair coverage'?
I suspect both Facebook and Google are still coming to terms with these issues and that people like the Norwegian Editor and you and I must play our part to remind them to tamper their immense powers for the betterment of society.
Ali Hussein
Principal
Hussein & Associates
+254 0713 601113
"Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what no one else has thought". ~ Albert Szent-Györgyi
Sent from my iPad
Definitely a lesson for all content regulators.
"In his open letter, Hansen points out that Facebook’s decision to delete the photograph reveals a troubling inability to “distinguish between child pornography and famous war photographs”, as well as an unwillingness to “allow[ing] space for good judgement”.
Mildred.
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim
of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares
or qualifications.