Dear ALL

It is very sad indeed. As a major stakeholder, I think the courts did not balance. It looked more on the purported injustice of the major media houses and ignored the broader goal of digital migration.

With regards to CCK all government institutions are moving towards complying to the constitution. And CCK will pass over the work and programs they have been implementing to the new body once it is formed in a smooth process that will not destroy the gains so far. What the courts have done is destroying all gains through this.

I have a feeling that very many Kenyans and professionals/institutions have very little knowledge on Digital migration. The courts included. CCK should offer a sensitization/ awareness forum on Digital migration to judges.

The consumers have lost because what the major media may do is to have all the channels they would think of just as they have done on radio. The consumer will miss diversity in content and programing.
How about young and upcoming medai houses. Will they ever have a chance in the meddial of these major houses. Talk of monopoly by the major houses that would always want to keep the status quo

Jane

On Sunday, March 30, 2014 6:51 AM, Ali Hussein <ali@hussein.me.ke> wrote:
Bernard

Don't bet on it. Unfortunately I'm coming to a sad conclusion regarding the judiciary. In its attempt to show how 'independent' it is we are seeing a move towards an 'activist judiciary' which negates the very reason why we went through such a painful reform process in the judiciary.

All I can say now is GOD HELP KENYA.


Ali Hussein

+254 0770 906375 / 0713 601113

Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
Blog: www.alyhussein.com

"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots".  ~ Albert Einstein

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 29, 2014, at 11:57 AM, "Bernard Kioko [Bernsoft Group]" <bkioko@bernsoft.com> wrote:

David,
 
You have summarized it well.
 
Perhaps the benefit of what happened yesterday is that at the Supreme Court, sanity will carry the day without the option of going to any other court thereafter. It appeared to me like that’s the “the plan” . Then again, is this wishful thinking on my part.
 
Regards
 
From: kictanet [mailto:kictanet-bounces+bkioko=bernsoft.com@lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of David Makali
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:40 AM
To: bkioko@bernsoft.com
Cc: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Digital Migration Appeal Court Ruling: COFEK Response
 
The court exceeded its mandate and sowed more confusion:
 
1. By legitimizing the expectation of the media owners for a license and proceeding to grant it one uncompetitively. So, why did the const require vetting of judges who were in office by 2010? They had a legitimate expectation to continue working into pensionhood, having held  their positions for years. The pt: the constitution erased all preferential expectations and set a new standard because of grievances over legitimacy and competence of the status quo.  In the case of ICT/ broadcasting, similar questions lie over the evenness of the ground.  The "competitive" standard in the award of any public resource or positions is to address such issues.
 
2. By simply voiding the rights of PANG which had been issued a license pursuant to a competitive process, however conducted by an "illegal" cck, and disregarding the injustice and financial consequences of such a decision. Why uphold the rights of one party and extinguish the rights of others? The court's Sympathy only seemed to lie on one side for which it poured out its heart generously, but totally ignored the rights of Pang and its subscribers.  A middle ground position, recognizing the predicament of the current media investors and a suitable remedy to the injustice it found committed against them by cck would have sufficed to put the country on a forward footing. But this? The next Destination seems to be the Supreme Court, which am afraid is going to be choking soon with many unnecessary petitions, thanks to the court of appeal's contestable strokes of justice. Pang, a subscriber, another investors, or even "cofek's" unrecognized consumers have more than enough ground the way I see it.
 
3. By failing to admonish the govt for its confused policy (chaotic really) and confirming how dangerous it is to invest n this country, in ict particularly, because it has protected investors, and others are secondary regardless of the processes, which are now routinely reversed. 
 
 

This is official mail. If you doubt the content, call back on +254722517540.

On Mar 29, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Dennis Kioko <dmbuvi@gmail.com> wrote:
Very interesting Grace. 
 
Was the court well versed on the whole digital migration process, spectrum and the fact that spectrum is a resource that belongs to all Kenyans, and not a few organisations? 

On Saturday, 29 March 2014, Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga@hotmail.com> wrote:
@Kioko, I quoted this sentence because I just didnt believe that a court of law can disregard the fact that there are rules to tendering processes. Inaonekana mambo ni yale yale!

“An independent body should therefore give them a licence without going through the tender process provided they comply with the regulations,” Mr Justice Maraga said.
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:26:13 +0300
From: dmbuvi@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Digital Migration Appeal Court Ruling: COFEK Response
CC: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
To: ggithaiga@hotmail.com

The court ruling as reported in the Daily Nation article is quite confusing.

First, the court is asking the government to reimburse PANG and StarTimes for their licensing fee and investments. How much will this cost the tax payer?

Second, the court in supporting its ruling, says media owners have invested a lot and they shouldn't lose their investment. The media owners will still lose their investment as digital broadcasting is a new technology that requires new infrastructure - perhaps the only infrastructure that can be reused is the towers.

Third, is the court implying that licenses issued by CCK are unconstitutional?
 
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Ali Hussein <ali@hussein.me.ke> wrote:
Listers
 
Lets step back and ask a few fundamental questions:-
 
1. How has CAK contravened the constitution in regards to the digital migration.
 
2. How does this affect the country in the scheme of things in relation to the global move to digital migration.
 
3. How does it benefit the consumer when we continue to perpetuate a status quo in the media space where a few big boys muscle out everyone? Maybe Consumer Federation can expound on this. 
 
4. How can we ensure going forward that the tendering processes are air-tight and can withstand frivolous suits. In light of what happened to the laptop tender we must ask a fundamental question: 
 
IS THIS GOVERNMENT SETTING ITSELF UP TO FAIL IN THE OCT SECTOR? 
 
Ali Hussein
 
+254 0770 906375 / 0713 601113
 
Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
Blog: www.alyhussein.com
 
"I fear the day technology will surpass human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots".  ~ Albert Einstein
 
Sent from my iPad

On Mar 29, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga@hotmail.com> wrote:


http://www.nation.co.ke/news/Victory-for-Kenyans-as-judges-halt-rush-to-digital-migration/-/1056/2261326/-/qc6k17z/-/index.html
“An independent body should therefore give them a licence without going through the tender process provided they comply with the regulations,” Mr Justice Maraga said.
 
Really? How now?
From: jgmbugua@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:36:37 +0300
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Digital Migration Appeal Court Ruling: COFEK Response
CC: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
To: ggithaiga@hotmail.com





 
Idiocy of the highest order. There is no win here only delay of the inevitable and stifling of innovation and investment.

Multichoice is certainly a winner.
 
 

From: Consumers Federation of Kenya (COFEK)<
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ggithaiga%40hotmail.com The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.


--
with Regards:
 
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/dmakali%40yahoo.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.



This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law and is intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, or disclosure or distribution is prohibited. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the contents and notify the sender immediately; do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium. Whilst our e-mails are checked for viruses, we cannot guarantee that this message or any attachment is virus free, does not contain malicious code or is incompatible with your electronic system and the Company does not accept liability in respect of viruses, malicious code or any related problems that you might experience. For further information about us, please contact us at the address indicated below.

Bernsoft Interactive Limited - P O Box 15177-00100 Nairobi - Tel: +254 722 929192 Email: admin@bernsoft.com Web: www.bernsoft.com 
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/nnfeischools%40yahoo.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.