Thanks for your thoughts Jimmy, and for the useful resources,
Agreed, economic planning needs to be data driven and strategic. Just to add that if indeed the data shows that we don't have comparative advantage in the sugar/maize sector, the study should also suggest what we can do as an alternative, so that we don't leave people worse off in pursuit of strategic (in)efficiency.
Perhaps Kenya can earn higher quality revenue as a value-add processing destination for, say, Sudan and Malawi, if the data says so, and in that case reciprocal trade treaties would be made (if AfCFTA doesn't remove the need for such) and County governments would organize the villagers to form import-process-export Cooperatives to transform the raw product, and export it within the region or internationally in processed form. That would be a good complement mix of strategic efficiency on one side balanced by strategic inefficiency on another side.
Motivations are at the heart of everything: If the goal behind every strategic economic decision is to leave the bottom-of pyramid majority better off as much as possible, our country will rapidly rise from poverty and enjoy the resultant benefits (e.g. a predictable political climate which attracts more prosperity... a positive feedback loop).
On get rich quick startups, I would disagree with your views because a get rich quick mentality is a key trait for entrepreneurship - if it comes from a value creation perspective. It is about recognizing that resources are scarce and therefore looking for the most productive way to allocate capital by generating compelling high value propositions for society.
Even investors want to get rich quick from their investments.. because they trade in capital (and have many lower-risk options e.g. bond markets)... and that's why the less sophisticated ones ask for outrageous equity for minimal investment (literally sabotaging themselves) and push to exit with multiples in less than 5-7 years which leads to a lot of craziness (and often guaranteed failure / loss).
Get rich quick becomes a problem when it is linked to extraction (deception / theft / plunder) instead of real value creation. But that is mitigated by rules (regulations), oversight (e.g. board representation) and checks/balances (e.g. investor appointed counter-signatories like CFOs). Systems fix these things.
Competent investors understand risk and would give credible reasons like high transaction costs (heterogeneous markets / low disposable incomes - which works against population size, political uncertainty, arbitrary rules, corruption which lowers rust in redress institutions like courts, lack of credible exit paths, liquidity challenges, inflation and fragile currency).
On financial services, beside the fact that it would displace jobs geographically (which would leave the now jobless farmers worse off), I don't think its a sustainable path for mass jobs creation (or growth). That sector is already being massively disrupted by tech - and things will get worse as Fintech AI becomes more reliable, accessible and affordable.
Have a great day!
Brgds,
Patrick.
Patrick A. M. Maina[Cross-domain Innovator | Public Policy Analyst - Indigenous Innovations]