5 Dec
2015
5 Dec
'15
12:33 p.m.
This is correct Walu. Regards<div id="DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><table style="border-top: 1px solid #aaabb6; margin-top: 10px;"> <tr> <td style="width: 105px; padding-top: 15px;"> <a href="https://www.avast.com/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank"><img src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png" style="width: 90px; height:33px;"/></a> </td> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 20px; color: #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. <br /><a href="https://www.avast.com/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a> </td> </tr> </table><a href="#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" height="1"></a></div> On 12/5/15, Walubengo J via kictanet <[email protected]> wrote: > @Karanja, > You are very right about little LOCAL research on this issue. > However, I want to say that the local researchers exist, but the local > players are VERY hesitant to engage. For example, 6weeks ago, I wrote to > all the local actors (Operators, Content Providers, Regulators, etc) around > these issues and I regret to say that ONLY one operator (Safaricom) and the > regulator (CA) cared to respond. > It then becomes extremely difficult to counter foreign supplied data with > 'local' data - that is not accessible because the data owners are not > responsive. Ironically, if these data was requested by multinational > researchers say from Mcainsey, they are likely to be treated better. > Until and unless we start believing and trusting our own researchers, Africa > will remain in awe of foreign data and research. We must explore ways that > would enable operators, content providers and others to open up to local > researchers - rather than just to foreign researchers. > walu. > > > From: Mose Karanja via kictanet <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: Mose Karanja <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 4:13 PM > Subject: [kictanet] Net Neutrality Debate Observations > > The NetNeutralityDebate in KenyaI have been keenly following the debate on > NetNeutralityglobally and especially the Kenyan one. The events of the last > three weeks kicking off at the Internetgovernance Forum in Brazil and the > KICTANet mailing list debate have been key and it is clear to me: > - There is a huge gulf between research numberspresented in defence or > opposition towards Free Basics/Internet.org in thedeveloping world. > - There is a limiting simplistic targeting of Facebook as the force > ofevil in this debate. > Inthe period after the IGF, discussions in Kenya and publications have moved > more towardsFacebook’s Free Basics; some objective and critical, some > clearly as generalattacks on Facebook as a company and Free Basics as a > product. It wasabsolutely great for Grace Githaiga to bring the Facebook > Policy team in toensure official positions are clarified and the members’ > questions would beanswered. > > > Myobservations > 1. The Net Neutrality debate we are having is quitelimited. The focus on > Free Basics is very much in order and I hope this kind ofenergy can go to > other contentious NN issues like protocol and peering discrimination (like > when Zuku caps yourdownload speeds when you are downloading Game of Thrones > from Pirate Sites orwhen streaming live matches) and IPdiscrimination (when > coffee joints, universities or organizations blockspecific websites like > YouTube, Facebook under the guise of productivity,obscenity or heavy-traffic > balance). These are top-of the head examples. 2. Our Kenyan primary > research on this area is asham! I am saying this as a researcher myself at > Strathmore Law School. That iswhy we cannot push back on the numbers and > data presented to us. Mozilla, Facebook, Stanford Uni all presentedsome > data. We have some opinion polls here and there but no substantive workhas > been done locally. I ask all of us to get our hands dirty and get the > dataout from the users in our country so we can have a solid case in > thesedebates. We have a huge task ahead of usif we are to step into the > global table of serious discussion. I cringed tohear an African participant > at the IGF say that Africans should be included inthe table discussing NN > and issues affecting Africa and Internet. This issomeone who had flown over > 10,000 miles to Brazil yet claimed Africans (thegenerality) should be > included in the discussion. I don’t think nobody everblocked someone off > from participating in the pre-IGF events and surely,playing that > racism/underdeveloped/Africa/Poverty card is so lame. Unless we conduct our > research, we willcontinue being consumers of knowledge, or whatever is > presented as such. 3. The organizations which deal directly withmasses of > end user are critical in giving feedback to the listers: ElimuTv forexample > is a good case. Most listers here are trapped in the > {Nairobi-globalcapitals’ conferences} and would profit from first hand > experiences from thecounties. 4. In Reconcilingpolitical and economic > goals in the net neutrality debate (PDF), the authors argue convincingly for > combining instruments towards an openInternet that upholds Net Neutrailty. > As it has always been clear, access tothe Internet is not a simple > technological issue that can fixed just by addingmore tech to the problem. > One more cable won’t solve the access problem. Definitelythe tech is core > but freedom of speech, economic independence, language issuesand political > participation at the local level matter as much. > CIPIT (at Strathmore) looks forward to partnering with all those who > areinterested in this topic in conducting primary research, forums and > policy making.Blatant attack on Facebook or Google or Apple or whatever as a > company is veryeasy. Anyone can do it. However, serious matters like this > need our critical energiesto offer credible alternatives to connect our > people to the Internet. > TL: DR: No, just read :) ---Moses Karanja | @Mose_Karanja | PGP: 0x1529552F > > > > > On Dec 4, 2015, at 3:37 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Send kictanet mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Introducing Facebook Africa Public Policy Team to > KICTANet (waudo siganga) > > From: waudo siganga <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Introducing Facebook Africa Public Policy Team to > KICTANet > Date: December 4, 2015 at 3:25:46 PM EAT > To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <[email protected]> > > > This looks useful. Kivuva/Hussein please comment. Looks like schools can be > able to access useful content without what the Bamba people call > "kunyanyaswa na kukatwakatwa kila mwezi" On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 02:46 PM, > Ebele Okobi via kictanet wrote: > That’s fantastic-education content is some of the most sought after for Free > Basics.A couple of things-Can you please have your team take a look at > Platform, and the technical specifications, > here? https://developers.facebook.com/docs/internet-org/platform-technical-guidelinesThen > they can submit, here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/internet-org I > will also connect you directly with our EMEA content lead!Thanks so much for > writing, and for the work that you do.Best, > Ebele <6F096681-9A34-452C-A5CD-1D0E4C64A463[1].png> Ebele Okobi | Head of > Public Policy, Africam. +44 (0) 771 156 13152 Stephen St | London | W1T > 1AN > [email protected] From: Network of non- formal Educational institutions > <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, December 4, 2015 at 5:17 AM > To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <[email protected]> > Cc: Ebele Okobi <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Introducing Facebook Africa Public Policy Team to > KICTANet Good morning to all Facebook has made a positive move towards > helping the poor communitiesWe offer secondary education on TV and use > Facebook to push some videos and interaction. However a good number of our > student have said they are not on Facebook because they can not afford > internetWe would wish to be included in the program. How do we go about > it Jane MuthigaDirector Elimu TV07231444259Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ebele Okobi via > kictanet<[email protected]> wrote:Thanks so much for these > questions! Please see below, in > line.<6F096681-9A34-452C-A5CD-1D0E4C64A463[2].png> Ebele Okobi | Head of > Public Policy, Africam. +44 (0) 771 156 13152 Stephen St | London | W1T > 1AN > [email protected] From: kictanet <FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a > possible JavaScript attack on your machine. URL disabled. Original > URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing click here.> on > behalf of Sidney Ochieng via kictanet <FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a > possible JavaScript attack on your machine. URL disabled. Original > URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing click here.> > Reply-To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <FastMail WARNING: URL text > contains a possible JavaScript attack on your machine. URL disabled. > Original URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing > click here.> > Date: Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 1:05 PM > To: Ebele Okobi <FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible JavaScript > attack on your machine. URL disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For > more information on phishing click here.> > Cc: Sidney Ochieng <FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible > JavaScript attack on your machine. URL disabled. Original > URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing click here.> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Introducing Facebook Africa Public Policy Team to > KICTANet Ebele, I'm still taking time to go through everything is your > rather exhaustive reply but I do have a couple of questions: > >From your participation guidelines: > - In addition, secure content is not supported and may not load. > > - Any data (e.g., proxy requests) or reporting we provide is deemed > Facebook confidential information and cannot be used by you for any > advertising purposes or shared with third parties. > Why isn't secure content explicitly supported?I am checking with our EMEA > content partnerships team; will get back soonest.What is the rationale for > the data and reporting condition?Per my exhaustive reply, ;-), we do not > allow any advertising on Free Basics, and we do not allow developers to > violate the privacy rights of users of Free Basics-see highlighted portion. > We do not want developers creating sites that profit off of Free Basics > users, or that use their data to advertise, or that share their data with > third parties. Also while the while the FAQs on that page say different > there's this condition: What do you mean when you say the FAQs on that > page “say different”? Can you please specify what you mean when you say the > FAQs “say different”? Thanks-once you do, will get back soonest. > Developer participation on the Free Basics Platform, including the > information submitted with your application, is otherwise governed by our > standard legal terms. Collectively, our standard legal terms and these > supplemental terms are the entire agreement between you and Facebook > relating to Free Basics, and any terms of use for your service will not > apply to Facebook. > Those legal terms contain this: > For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and > videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, > subject to your privacy andapplication settings: you grant us a > non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license > to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP > License). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your > account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not > deleted it. > So what takes precedence, the FAQ or legal terms? What does this mean for > content producers who make a living of that content if Facebook chooses to > exercise this right?? Finally Nanjira makes an important point in her post > here(FastMail WARNING: URL text and host don't match, possible phishing > attempt. URL disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nanjira.com_2015_11_taking-2Dfree-2Dbasics-2Din-2Dkenya-2Don-2Da-2Dspin_&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=Cp8Zhr_tnbaqOM4LZRPNAn7V_mxOKDAh96-gN1NaFa4&s=tamyx3t5M9AFkipSkz16d77shVWhSd5eWqL4cGdnWkc&e='. > Original > text='http://nanjira.com/2015/11/taking-free-basics-in-kenya-on-a-spin/'. > For more information on phishing click here.) about how the platform, in > Kenya at least, seems set up for consumption. Why is this? Was this an > explicit decision or a side-effect of the chosen platforms? What is Facebook > doing to encourage people to provide content to these sites?Platform is > actually set up for people to create, but Free Basics is meant to be a > light-weight product that operators are willing to provide for free, for > people new to the Internet. Per previously—Free Basics is meant to be an > on-ramp to the Internet. It’s not meant to be a place where people stay. The > kind of Internet access that supports content creation requires all kinds of > inputs (electricity, broadband, infrastructure) that Facebook alone is not > solely equipped to provide in 192 countries around the world. It’s no > coincidence that the countries with the most creators are countries with a) > the most resources and b) the biggest government investment in > infrastructure. As you know, it’s not Facebook that charges for Internet > access in developing countries-it’s operators. Are operators willing to > provide unlimited access, for free, to people? Should they? I think the > primary thing to remember, per my email is that Free Basics is not, at all, > meant to be a holistic answer to a complex issue. It is only meant to be a > short/medium-term way of addressing two very specific linked barriers to > access-awareness and cost. Looking forward to hearing your responses and I > will be adding other questions as I go through your response(s). On 3 > December 2015 at 13:00, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <FastMail WARNING: URL > text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your machine. URL disabled. > Original URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing > click here.> wrote: > Hi Ebele,Many thanks for your responses. I have a somewhat dumb question, > some might have been partly addressed.1. What role does the facebook public > policy team play in Africa?2. What led to the creation of the team?3. What > are facebooks plans regarding promotion of local content and extending > connectivity to marginalized areas?4. What is Facebooks defination of Net > Neutrality and what is its position on the same?Please educate meThanksOn > Dec 3, 2015 9:56 AM, "Ebele Okobi via kictanet" <FastMail WARNING: URL text > contains a possible JavaScript attack on your machine. URL disabled. > Original URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing > click here.> wrote: > Zero-rating plans are indeed fully compatible and offered along with paid > plans-they are just one of many options, and per my response below, > zero-rating that is paid for by operator must exist together with paid plans > because if not, the operator can't survive. > > Ebele Okobi | Head of Public Policy, Africam. +44 (0) 771 156 1315 10 Brock > Street | London | NW1 3FGFastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible > JavaScript attack on your machine. URL disabled. Original > URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing click here. > On Dec 3, 2015, at 5:57 AM, waudo siganga via kictanet <FastMail WARNING: > URL text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your machine. URL > disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing > click here.> wrote: > > A quick one for Kivuva, Hussein, Ebele - Please clarify is this Zero-rating > incompatible with, i.e. mutually exclusive to paid services? Why cant they > operate TOGETHER. Waudo On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 01:52 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva > wrote: > There is a good satirical letter from Max, Zuckerberg's daughter on giving > people free access to Facebook as if it was water or electricity: FastMail > WARNING: URL text and host don't match, possible phishing attempt. URL > disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.theregister.co.uk_2015_12_02_max-5Fzuckerberg-5Freply-5Fletter_&d=CwMCAw&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=1ofvsWEAoehiEhB-dCxh1KgaGPcRfqQJtXIk2EWLIdY&s=sTudx9RKEpMTIDrooq2cQ0jfcJSIgIeFLOoxc6FzFHg&e='. > Original > text='http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/02/max_zuckerberg_reply_letter/'. > For more information on phishing click here.,On Dec 3, 2015 1:05 > AM, FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your > machine. URL disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For more > information on phishing click here.wrote: > Dr. Waudo, your questions are valid, and very well structured. This is what > has been asked for some years now. And the idea of asking Facebook to come > over is for them to school us too on their view of net neutrality.But find > my attempt inline:On Dec 2, 2015 6:48 PM, "waudo siganga" <FastMail WARNING: > URL text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your machine. URL > disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For more information on phishing > click here.> wrote: >> >> Hi Kivuva/Hussein. I need a little more enlightenment: >> >> 1. Is the "Zero-Rating" issue a debate or has it already been concluded >> that it is a bad thing? There is a hint that supporting it may leave one >> in not very good standing..This has not been agreed upon. We would >> probably not get an answer to whether it is good or bad. But some >> countries have determined and outlawed zero rating, some analyze zero >> rating requests on case by case basis, and other have approved zero >> rating.> 2. According to Kivuva's well-written article "Zero rating >> infringes on fundamental human rights by denying users access to the >> Internet". Are other service providers, including those offering "full" >> Internet Access at a fee, stopped or hindered from offering their services >> when some companies offer the zero-rating? Can both forms operate at the >> same time?This is a great question. And it is probably the main selling >> point for zero rating. To answer the question, if you have a data package, >> you can access the Internet outside the zero rated area. I probably like >> the idea. But what are the root cause for using zero rating? Can we make >> the Internet affordable?> 3. In Q2 above I have "full" in quotes because >> in my use of Internet I am yet to come across a truly "neutral Internet" >> i.e. sometimes I try to access certain websites or services and you are >> unable as you get a message that you cannot access that site/service from >> your country, meaning many services providers already practise packet >> filtering.True. There are many ways in which net neutrality is infringed, >> and there are different legislation from country to country on those >> aspects. The one that has affected us more is bandwidth trotting, >> especially of bit torrent traffic. An ISP advertises unlimited Internet >> access at $$$, then when you start using more resources than they had >> anticipated, they tighten your pipe. Bandwidth trotting and protocol >> blocking was banned by EU in 2014. Mobile carriers used to block access to >> Skype because it hurts voice, calling, and text-messaging revenue.So part >> of why we have been calling for a Net Neutrality law in Kenya is to >> protect the consumer, and also have a stand. Currently, the ISP can do >> whatever they want. The model to adopt is upto the community.> 4. Hussein >> gives certain characteristics of a "market" but probably leaves out a very >> critical one: Choice. The best market is the one where ALL service >> providers are given the opportunity to offer their services and consumers >> are left to choose. At the end of the day it is the consumers that decide >> which companies and services survive and which wilt along the way. Why >> choose for the consumer beforehand by barring certain services or business >> models?Be careful before you imprison yourself with your own words :). In >> the same breath of choice, who decided which websites a consumer should >> have access to? Why choose for the consumer beforehand? :) Why limit >> consumer choice?At another level, consumers are not usually very >> knowledgeable in what they want, or even what is good for a country. I'm >> ready to bet that if one country allows zero rating, and another country >> provides reliable affordable broadband, then the one with affordable >> broadband will experience faster economic growth. This is just an >> hypothesis.> 5. A couple of years ago the cost and affordability of >> Internet access was a key ICT public policy issue. We said it was a major >> impediment to the spread of Internet use. How do we reconcile that with >> opposition to free (ok "free" as Hussein corrected me) services even if >> they are only offering a slice of what an open Internet offers.Cost and >> access are still very relevant especially in our region of the world. That >> was why the IGF theme was "connecting the next billion." And there are >> very great suggestions thrown around on how to reduce the cost. Licensing, >> competition, usf, infrastructure sharing, taxes,...... We are really >> disadvantaged when it comes to utilising the great benefits of the >> Internet. Now what happens when we shrink that space more?> >> On a lighter note these days I am very happy with Facebook especially the >> Groups, as I get to know what is going on in the village. But I have been >> accessing them using a paid service perhaps I can save a few shillings if >> I got to know how to connect for free.And Facebook likes these case >> studies. I heard them happily say how they are helping women chamas >> organise themselves, and also organise civil activism to foster democracy >> in places like Myanmar. Well, I want that too :-)> >> I know Kivuva and Hussein have had extensive opportunity to study this >> area of Zero-Rating and also to listen o experts so I apologize in advance >> if my questions do not sound sophisticated. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Waudo >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015, at 05:07 PM, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote: >>> >>> We are having the most vibrant debate on Net Neutrality on the list in a >>> long while. Thanks for all contributors, and GG for initiating this >>> timely discussion. It's exciting to see many people interested with the >>> zero rating debate. I'm sure Ebele and Akua from Facebook are fascinated >>> by the dynamism of this group. Thank you Ebele and Akua for graciously >>> joining this debate. >>> >>> I'll keep my opinions to myself and only ask questions. >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. Does Facebook support Net Neutrality? >>> >>> 2. Does Facebook's zero rating contravene net neutrality principle? >>> >>> 3. Will Facebook take "zero rated services" to areas without any >>> connectivity infrastructure? >>> >>> 4. Will Facebook zero rated services reach all the people, even those >>> with feature phones? Does fb have non app based Free basics?. What >>> percentage of your target market has access to smart phones? >>> >>> 5. Which network operators does Facebook work with? Are all ISPs welcomed >>> to the party? >>> >>> 6. Will free basics help reduce the cost of internet access? >>> >>> 7. Does Facebook pay ISPs to offer the "walled garden" to end users? >>> >>> 8. Why is Facebook running campaigns for "free basics" in a way to >>> suggest that it is giving free access to the internet? Is FB and a few >>> vanilla websites the Internet? >>> >>> 9. Facebook is considered affluent. Would it consider providing free >>> internet to everyone? >>> >>> 10. Is free basics bridging the digital divide or creating confusion of >>> those who cannot differentiate between Facebook and the Internet? Is >>> Facebook keen that users from the developing world have access to the >>> whole wealth of knowledge and information that the Internet provides? >>> >>> >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Mwendwa Kivuva > > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your > machine. URL disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For more > information on phishing click here. > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_listinfo_kictanet&d=CwICAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=1ofvsWEAoehiEhB-dCxh1KgaGPcRfqQJtXIk2EWLIdY&s=ejTJSA1Ii_nH1yv4L-4D-9LsRNeZgcGaew0ikL4BIT8&e= > > Unsubscribe or change your options > at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_options_kictanet_ebeleokobi-2540fb.com&d=CwICAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=1ofvsWEAoehiEhB-dCxh1KgaGPcRfqQJtXIk2EWLIdY&s=MIDOW1aUaio5OVMgPpueIyPPWgYumAkLegk3fK70_Qk&e= > > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and > development. > > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your > machine. URL disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For more > information on phishing click here.FastMail WARNING: URL text and host don't > match, possible phishing attempt. URL disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_listinfo_kictanet&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=Cp8Zhr_tnbaqOM4LZRPNAn7V_mxOKDAh96-gN1NaFa4&s=N_5kdfZuq4MRPEdhwD8JKM-LMEjlMsYPpRyG6HBiJvM&e='. > Original text='https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet'. For > more information on phishing click here. > > Unsubscribe or change your options at FastMail WARNING: URL text and host > don't match, possible phishing attempt. URL disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_options_kictanet_otieno.barrack-2540gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=Cp8Zhr_tnbaqOM4LZRPNAn7V_mxOKDAh96-gN1NaFa4&s=ZVg9HTBqe3D2UV0LaFUV0VZLtJGxWPwBChg1Xy51VrU&e='. > Original > text=' https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack%40gmail.com'. > For more information on phishing click here. > > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and > development. > > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your > machine. URL disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For more > information on phishing click here. > FastMail WARNING: URL text and host don't match, possible phishing attempt. > URL disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_listinfo_kictanet&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=Cp8Zhr_tnbaqOM4LZRPNAn7V_mxOKDAh96-gN1NaFa4&s=N_5kdfZuq4MRPEdhwD8JKM-LMEjlMsYPpRyG6HBiJvM&e='. > Original text='https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet'. For > more information on phishing click here. > > Unsubscribe or change your options at FastMail WARNING: URL text and host > don't match, possible phishing attempt. URL disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_options_kictanet_sidney.ochieng-2540gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=Cp8Zhr_tnbaqOM4LZRPNAn7V_mxOKDAh96-gN1NaFa4&s=CKEellyjRFydleNtPGvQEXxrK2wFudEHAn4qSbSbM9k&e='. > Original > text=' https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/sidney.ochieng%40gmail.com'. > For more information on phishing click here. > > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and > development. > > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. > -- Regards, > > | Sidney Ochieng | > | | > | | > | | > | Skype: sidney.ochieng | Twitter: @princelySid | Website: FastMail WARNING: > URL text and host don't match, possible phishing attempt. URL disabled. > Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sidneyochieng.co.ke&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=Cp8Zhr_tnbaqOM4LZRPNAn7V_mxOKDAh96-gN1NaFa4&s=0LuLKMt4VsHRi4QCra6YjT_42Ql84Ee7RpwHWz1qu4E&e='. > Original text='http://sidneyochieng.co.ke'. For more information on phishing > click here. | > | | > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > FastMail WARNING: URL text contains a possible JavaScript attack on your > machine. URL disabled. Original URL='javascript:return'. For more > information on phishing click here. > FastMail WARNING: URL text and host don't match, possible phishing attempt. > URL disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_listinfo_kictanet&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=zZ6qbsDNBO7gagtgwHhrMWvNzgNU5DpzRC0eOZG-nDw&s=QHyizZSHupRadMt7kza76snwrkDkkPXfR_AWd5cuHOQ&e='. > Original text='https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet'. For > more information on phishing click here. > > Unsubscribe or change your options at FastMail WARNING: URL text and host > don't match, possible phishing attempt. URL disabled. Original > URL='https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.kictanet.or.ke_mailman_options_kictanet_nnfeischools-2540yahoo.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=ArvepG4_wcNu_X9xi3nb_Xa9WsGLVfmK6mwPdVONOTE&m=zZ6qbsDNBO7gagtgwHhrMWvNzgNU5DpzRC0eOZG-nDw&s=9ACgtzebdhRGlZ-bGGRT_Xm1di8LMOCVHqu4IodxcEo&e='. > Original > text=' https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/nnfeischools%40yahoo.com'. > For more information on phishing click here. > > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and > development. > > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. > _______________________________________________kictanet mailing > [email protected]://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe > or change your options > at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emailsignet%40mailcan.com The > Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and > development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable > behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and > bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect > privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.Email had 2 > attachments: > - 6F096681-9A34-452C-A5CD-1D0E4C64A463[1].png > 7k (image/png) > - 6F096681-9A34-452C-A5CD-1D0E4C64A463[2].png > 7k (image/png) > > <6F096681-9A34-452C-A5CD-1D0E4C64A463[2].png> > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > > _______________________________________________ > kictanet mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet > > Unsubscribe or change your options at > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com > > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and > development. > > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. > > -- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254-20-2498789 Skype: barrack.otieno http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/