From: "bitange@jambo.co.ke"
<bitange@jambo.co.ke>
To:
robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk
Cc:
KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
<kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Sun, 24 July, 2011
19:49:29
Subject: Re:
[kictanet] Digital TV signal Distribution row-@Kenya
IGF
Listers,
Please step out of the box and understand this
issue. There are about 30
companies with license to distribute Internet
Protocol (IP) signinal. Of
these just a handful are controlled by
Kenyans. The licenses issued to
Signet and PANG (Chinese)to distribute
Broadcasting signal is actually the
same given to other IP signal
distributors. In essence any telco would
have easily distributed the
signal. This is because broadcast and
telecommunications have
converged.
One would ask why we did not just give the existing IP signal
distributors
to roll out digital broadcast. Indeed we considered this
and we knew
broadcasters would resist the power that telcos would wield (read
Banks).
We then decided to create a special Broadcast IP signal license
knowing
very well that the development of Web TV is advancing fast.
Indeed the
technologies like DVBT, ISDBT etc would be eliminated once web tv
takes
over in another 5 years. This would mean that even CCK will not
issue
such IP licenses but only content license.
We are simply in a
development stage and check my words. There is no
Broadcast Signal
licensee (if their intention is to only distribute
broadcast signal) who will
recover the Ksh. 4 billion investment before
the broadcast technology shifts
to web broadcasting. We are already into
Youtube and the like.
Sometines follow ITU discussions, it is just a
matter of time before all of
us become broadcasters from our websites.
All research is now focused on
moving from Standard Definition to High
Defition to 3D on the web. Just
check TV manufacturers to understand the
direction we are going.
Already there is Internet TV with 1,500 free to
air channels from
Samsung. The smart TV which incorpotates today and
tomorrow video
requirements.
We have been boxed into a small corner with lies.
Indeed I have called my
counterparts in Rwanda and Uganda and there is
nothing with cancellation
of licenses as reported. You can call and
check. Prior to advertizing
the tender, the Migration Committee had
offered shares in Signet or better
the license to all broadcasters owing to
their investments in the sector
that will go to waste. Instead they
started fighting among themselves and
agreed to a competitive bid but they
did not report this.
Under affirmative action, we shall proceed to issue
the third license to
the compainants on condition they incorporate others who
already have
infrastructure but only time will tell. (Mtoto akililia
wembe, mpatie).
It is not a wise decision for them if their intent is to
protect our
sovreinity through local entrepreneurship. The war in
future will be in
content and so Intellectual Property is where we must focus
our energies.
The last time I checked Ngurario in the net, it was a product
of Intel and
Microsoft. I do not know what is more important, our
heritage or channels
to which we distribute our creations.
We shall
benefit from this interaction if we think mostly out of the box
and
understand what is important to our future. The Government is
devolving
power to the citizens as evidenced with the launch of open
government.
But if the citizens continue with the old politically correct
statements that
have no evidence then we have a problem. These are some
of the people
who will be told of a revolution that happened during their
time but were not
able to see it because they were blinded with the
past.
Regards
Ndemo.
> Allow me
to add some comments on this thread. :-)
>
> Why is the ownership of
the core signal distribution facilities of
> national
> importance ?
I agree with Hon Eng Rege's assesment of potential sabotage
> and
>
this alone is serious enough. Today we can openly discuss issues of such
>
importance, who knows what will be the situation in another 20 years.
All
> global governments have been known to back track or fast track. In
20
> years
> time, we will have changed govt, policies to match
back-tracking or
> fast-tracking at least 5 different times but two local
companies will
> still
> be in existence i.e NMG/Royal Media and
operating the national signal
> distribution without any effects
whatsoever. We are also players in the
> global world and there is also
the problem of global policies that affects
> us. If tomorrow China came
under any sanctions internationally for
> whatever
> reason and that
all developing nations have to follow the lead on showing
> how they
support these sanctions, will the govt then shutdown the licensed
>
facilities? Case of this is now Libya, which unfortunately developing
>
countries are also being sucked into and told to choose sides between
>
blocking assets and the rest . How would it work then? Anyone know what
is
> happening to Laico Regency and Oil-Libya in Kenya, please share
some
> details.
>
> The signal distribution network and
facilities are as important as the
> signals of DOD. Will we also pass
these signals and controls to external
> parties? I hope not. Nothing
against China, as an investor it will be
> unfortunately get caught up
with issues that arise from developing
> countries
> fast tracking
shortcuts versus almost zero internal initiatives on core
> ownership
development. In this case, I'd have to support the local media
> groups
that can finance, operate and rollout ownership of facilities
>
versus
> the argument that market competion will drive a diverse
solutions. It
> seems
> that there aren't that many media stations
which would be able to use more
> facilties even if they were
available.
>
> My thoughts and corrections welcome.
>
>
Thank you.
>
>
----------------------------------------------
> This message has been
scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and
is
> believed to be clean.
>
---------------------------------------------
> "easy access to the
world"
>
> _______________________________________________
>
kictanet mailing list
>
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet>
>
Unsubscribe or change your options at
>
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke>
>
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>
for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>
regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>
sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>
development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of
acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect
people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or
personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or
qualifications.
----------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Jambo
MailScanner, and is
believed to be
clean.
---------------------------------------------
"easy access to the
world"
_______________________________________________
kictanet
mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.kehttp://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanetUnsubscribe
or change your options at
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/robertyawe%40yahoo.co.ukThe
Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people
and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The
network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the
national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette :
Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in
real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or
abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or
qualifications.