On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:15 AM, lordmwesh <
lordmwesh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Policy on IPV6 would come in handy.
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/AFPUB-2004-v6-001.htm
Assume that one day we wake up, and
> there are no more public IPV4 to allocate, yet our companies and government
> agencies are stuck with IPV4 hardware.
Unless their kit is like 15 years old, then this is not the case. All
*Nix boes, Apple, and Windows (NT and after IIRC) are v6 ready.
It's the CPEs/home routers that we need to be concerned about. Many
are not v6 compatible. Doesn't matter where you are in the world.
According to AFRINIC, we only have
> like 370 days to exhaustion of IPV4.
Well, what does that mean? It means that IANA will have no more /8s of
v4 to allocate to RIRs. AfriNIC will have v4 for at least another
year after that.
> @Barrack, you are right by calling us names "A copy paste society" J. But
> don’t forget the East achieved innovation and growth by first realizing that
> "imitate then innovate" is just as good. Ask Tata motors who now own big
> brands like Land Rover.
TATA also run SEACOM and have a PoP in KE.
> Congratulations to the relevant Kenyan Ministries of Technology which have
> really endeavored to be being abreast with changing trends in the tech field
> despite the many challenges we face. On innovation, our universities and
> institutes have outdates labs, and teach outdated subject that were copy
> pasted some years back from the west. Solutions to these problems have to be
> found.
KENET is implementing v6 across its network, no?
as expected..they are a bigger market and have more engineers to do
things like deploy v6.
>
> Early adoption of IPV6 would help us learn and get experience on the various
> services and innovation that we can implement on the new IP scheme.
"early adoption" would have been done a decade ago.
We don’t
> want to be struggling with implementing IPV6 systems decades down the line
> after the west are comfortably using theirs.
Not to worry, the West will implement v6 pole pole, just like KE.
Michuki put it correctly, we
> need the experience of using the new scheme, not just the theory we learn in
> Cisco classes. And experience can only be achieved by implementation
that's right, have you dual stacked your network? Maybe we should have
a competition amongst network operators?
>
>
>
> DNSSEC signing of the root domain server will surely improve cyber security.
only if your nameserver uses DNSSEC.
a page that has a misleading headline of "Google Expands Control of
Internet Architecture:" leads me to think twice about their
perspective.
>
> The DNS system consists of both resolvers (find the DNS data for a DNS name)
> and hosts (those that publish DNS data for a domain name).
hmmm, I would say there are resolvers and other nameservers, not hosts.
The pilot in
> Sweden has shown that DNSSEC is only of value when both the hosts and
> resolvers deploy
of course, all links in the chain MUST speak DNSSEC.
@Walu: Dude, It';s not your fault, and it's not the fault of
AfriNIC/Kenyan IPv6 Task Force. If ISPs don't use v6 it's becasue
there is no DEMAND for it (yet). Customers create demand, the GoK
could mandate v6 connectivity in all their contracts with ISPs,
starting with KT/Oranje running their fiber net.
I think your being a bit paranoid about the rich world here....It is
not possible for the well off to "grab all the Internet Resources from
the poor South...". You shold know this, and being part of the Board
of the NIC, you should fight this kind of misperception, not
perpetuate it!!
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel