Thanks Ali, Barrack and Jaco. The message is clear: the education system as well as intermediaries have a role in educating users of their responsibility online.
Listers, please feel free to continue the debate under the thread of Hate text messages/KICA Section 29.
Today, we focus our attention to prosecution of online hate speech. The NCIC has threatened to prosecute online hate speech as political campaigns intensify ahead of the 2013 March general elections. The Chair of NCIS was quoted in yesterday’s Daily Nation as saying that his Commission is working with cyber cafes to monitor hate speech.
There seems to be uncertainty on what offences may happen on communication networks and whether intermediaries would be liable or not. Such intermediaries as Safaricom have come up with rules that will be applied for political advertising on its network; while Nation Media has NMG blog rules (see http://www.nation.co.ke/meta/-/1194/1132038/-/88lbspz/-/index.html). NMG is cautious in particular after being sued for comments made by a reader on its blog on a story about Uhuru Kenyatta.
Is it advisable for these intermediaries to take caution or encourage self regulation or what should they do?
How successful do you think the NCIC will be in prosecuting online hate speech?
Over to you Listers.
Rgds
GG
Subject: RE: [kictanet] Hate text messages/KICA Section 29
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:20:46 +0200
From: j.dutoit@unesco.org
To: ggithaiga@hotmail.com
CC: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke; isoc@orion.my.co.ke
Dear Grace,
The education system definitely has a role to play in media and information literacy, but I would argue that it is also in the interest of the intermediaries to get involved in such education initiatives.
Best regards< /p>
Jaco
-------------------------------------------------
Jaco DU TOIT
Adviser for Communication & Info rmation
UNESCO Regional Office for Eastern Africa
United Nations Avenue, UNON, Gigiri (Room C-104)
P.O. Box 30592-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: +254 (0)20 762 2346/2566
Mobile: +254 (0)728 610 912
Email:j.dutoit@unesco.org,
Website: http://www.unesco-nairobi.org
From: kictanet [mailto:kictanet-bounces+j.dutoit=une sco.org@lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of Grace Githaiga
Sent: Tuesday, 16 October, 2012 3:57 PM
To: Du Toit, Jaco
Cc: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke; isoc@orion.my.co.ke
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Hate text messages/KICA Section 29
Thanks Barrack, Jaco and Kariuki for your views.
Jaco, we note your point on the need for users to take responsibility on what they post and the need for information and media literacy for users. Barrack is of the same opinion that there is need for an education of users on their responsibility online. If I may ask both of you, who would be responsible for conducting this sort of education?
Kariuki, you make a very good point about what may have informed the introduction section 29 of KICA namely the facsimile. Considering that technology has evolved and the internet is no longer in infancy, what would you recommend for this section?
Listers, lets here more input from you.
Rgds
Grace
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:47:13 +0300
From: otieno.barrack@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Hate text messages/KICA Section 29
CC: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke; isoc@orion.my.co.ke
To: ggithaiga@hotmail.com
GG,
Intermediaries are liable to a certain extent, when a computer broadcasts spam, its IP address is blacklisted and users might not be able to use it to send mail until corrective measures are taken. I beleive this is meant to ensure that the Intermediary is responsible for the content emanating from the network? if this is the case, why shouldn't the government which has a responsibility over the safety and security of every citizen not take the intermediary to court to produce the the real culprit? Imagine what would have happened in the the recent case when a child was kidnapped from a City Church if the Intermediary had not been of assistance to the state agencies, now that the populace understands the value of the Internet we should start educating them about their rights responsibility on the net same case applies to the Intermediaries, if this issues are not enshrined in the law it will be total chaos ( looking at it from a government perspective)
Best RegardsOn Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:58 AM, John Kariuki <ngethe.kariuki2007@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Grace,Listers,
Section 29 of KICA was first introduced in Kenya law in 1998 at the infancy of the Internet in Kenya and was based mainly on experience of Facsimile.It was, in my view, at that time not intended for intermediaries.
However,if today a smart lawyer can adduce pursuasive evidence in court that indeed the intermediary was actually the 'sender' not mere 'carrier', I see no reason why he may not secure a conviction based on KICA section 29.
&nbs p;
John Kariuki.
From: Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga@hotmail.com>
To: ngethe.kariuki2007@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Tuesday, 16 October 2012, 1:02
Subject: [kictanet] Hate text messages/KICA Section 29
Good morning Listers
I would like to thank Jane, Barrack and Topista for views expressed on yesterday's topic Shooting the messenger.
They did express the need to place some level of responsibility on both the source of the content and the host platform. Further they underscored the need to have a good information system that operates under a sound policy framework if it is to be useful to society.
Today we look at Section 29 of the KICA (improper use of system) http://www.cck.go.ke/regulations/downloads/KenyaInformation-Communications-Act-Final.pdf that is increasingly being used as a basis for criminal charges for users of technology based platforms. See example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q7VmsYNsqE
29. A person who by means of a licensed telecommunication system—
(a) sends a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b) sends a message that he knows to be false for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another person
commits an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand shillings, or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or to both.
Could misuse of an information system also be used to charge intermediaries? Would this call for the training of the Kenya Police, DPP and Judiciary so that they understand the issues as they litigate and make rulings?
Listers, lets hear your views. Further, please feel free to go back to yesterday's thread on shooting the messenger if you would like to contribute.
Have a wonderful day
Rgds
GG
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ngethe.kariuki2007%40yahoo.co.uk
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and in stitutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
--
Barrack O. Otieno+254-20-2498789
Skype: barrack.otieno
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ggithaiga%40hotmail.com The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________
isoc mailing list
isoc@orion.my.co.ke
http://orion.my.co.ke/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/isoc