Interesting. In UG the Uganda Broadband infrastructure strategy team had recomended similar clasifications for Broadband starting with 256K and doubling every year. So looks like we were not too far of the mark. However the challenge would be the enforceability of this and whether it will be left to the market to or to the regulators to ensure compliance. Market preference means that clients would vote with their feet in choosing the provider who delivers but since it is a sellers market the feeling is that the impact would be limited. Regulatory enforcement would put a big strain on the resources. Interesting to hear views on this. Regards Badru
-----Original Message----- From: kictanet-bounces+ntegeb=one2net.co.ug@lists.kictanet.or.ke [mailto:kictanet-bounces+ntegeb=one2net.co.ug@lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of bitange@jambo.co.ke Sent: 25 October 2009 22:36 To: ntegeb@one2net.co.ug Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions Subject: Re: [kictanet] The future of the IGF
Dear All, Attached please find the Finish Press Release on Broadband.
Courtesy of the Finish Trade Attache.
Ndemo. ---------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------- "easy access to the world"