Listers, 
It is difficult to interrogate a Bill without the policy which informed the drafting of the Bill? So where is the policy and were there any stakeholder consultations. If none the process is unconstitutional. 

John Kariuki. 


Sent from Samsung Mobile



-------- Original message --------
From: Collins Areba via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Date:
To: ngethe.kariuki2007@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: Collins Areba <arebacollins@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] KENYA ICT PRACTITIONERS BILL NOW IN PARLIAMENT, PAY XXX PER YEAR FOR LICENSE TO PRACTICE


I have read it end to end. I would personally have not much else to say beyond this.

 

1: This is a cartel, pure and simple.  You create a walled garden, have five or so people deciding who can “practice” and who cannot. The same five people decide what the rules of the game are, so mid point, this can change as and when it suits them. Sooner or later, it shall be a requirement for anyone who wants to do business with government, the single largest market for the small scale business operator, to be registered.

 

2: The sector, and by the bills very wording is very fluid. Both in its definition and in its very sense. ICT permeates such a broad section of the world that it ideally should never exist as an independent sector. A CT scan is a computer in its most impirical definition, As such radiologists should be bound by these regulations. The same should apply to bribe taking NTSA officers who use “computers” and ICT to entrap drunk overspeeding motorists. They should as well be bound by the same rules governing ICT practice , yes? How about Mama mboga? Who receives and makes payments via Mpesa? Where exactly do you draw the line? Pilots flying computers laden in fuel? How do you decide a programmer should pay from earning from leveraging technology in creating software, and an MPESA agent using technology 100% of the time in their day to day earnings doesn’t?

 

3: I reserve my other comments to when I get to understand who exactly an ICT practitioner is.

 

 

From: kictanet <kictanet-bounces+arebacollins=gmail.com@lists.kictanet.or.ke> on behalf of Ali Hussein via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Reply-To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Date: Tuesday, 5 July 2016 8:50 pm
To: Collins Areba <arebacollins@gmail.com>
Cc: Ali Hussein <ali@hussein.me.ke>
Subject: [kictanet] KENYA ICT PRACTITIONERS BILL NOW IN PARLIAMENT, PAY XXX PER YEAR FOR LICENSE TO PRACTICE

 

Listers



I know some discussions threads are going on about this but I thought to bring more focus to this issue by starting a thread with the appropriate subject line.

 

1.  Who was aware of this? 

2. Who originated the Bill and how widely did they consult.

3. How was the ICT professional body that gets to appoint Council members arrived at? (Council members dictate who can b registred/derigistered).

4. Who exactly is an ICT practitioner...given that ICT is an ever evolving field with jobs of the future still being created.

 

The floor is open.

 

Ali Hussein

Principal

Hussein & Associates

+254 0713 601113 / 0770906375

 

Twitter: @AliHKassim

Skype: abu-jomo

LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim

 



"Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what no one else has thought".  ~ Albert Szent-Györgyi



Sent from my iPad

 

Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:08:30 +0300

Subject: Re: [kictanet] FW: [nairobilug] Draft National ICT policy
From: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
CC: wainaina@DigitalTVAfrica.com
To: ggithaiga@hotmail.com

This brings up the question of the Computer Society of Kenya (CSK) led by Waudo Siganga.....versus the new ICTAK led by Kamotho Njenga / Selasio Kiura.

 

What was the criteria for picking which of these and any others will basically regulate the ICT "profession"?

 

------------

ICTAK

"While I did not intend to comment on the contents of the Bill, I can't help but notice that one ICT Association of Kenya will have the arduous task of appointing five (out of nine) people to the Council that will regulate professionals (Section 4). Pray tell, who is this association?"

 

 

CSK

(on their website)
"The Computer Society of Kenya is the recognized association for Information, Communication and Technology industries and professionals in Kenya, attracting large and active membership from all levels of the IT industry and providing a wide range of services to its 6,000 + members."

 

On Tuesday, July 5, 2016, Grace Mutung'u (Bomu) via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:

Interesting developments Alex. 

My initial reaction after reading the Bill is, questions questions questions: 

First of all, why would anyone conceive such an idea? To cure what problem? How will it better society as a whole? If indeed there was a problem to be addressed, couldn't the same have been dealt with in the policy process first? Assuming this Bill emanated from the Ministry, why would the Ministry undertake a policy review process and at the same time undertake a legal process to regulate the profession? And why is regulation of ICT professionals not even mentioned in the draft policy? We are always ready to engage and I am shocked to have learnt of the process so far in the day. Or did ICT professionals have a processes the outcome of which is this Bill? 

 

Speaking of a profession, what is the ICT profession? I see the Bill has attempted a definition at section 2 but isn't ICTs the most dynamic and cross cutting "profession" we have? Was there a study done to support such a disruptive regulation of the profession? Are there other countries that regulate their geeks this much? So what informed this legislation? 

 

Think of all the young people who eke a living from ICT related businesses. Why would anyone want to subject all these youth, together with those graduating from colleges and universities to one more hurdle before they can start working? Can't we leave it to the market to separate the very good practitioners from the average ones? 

I do not understand the Kenyan obsession with  ever regulating professions. What I know is that it is expensive for parents to perpetually pay fees before their (overgrown) children can finally get employment. It is also an additional cost to businesses as they have to foot the cost of compliance for the various professionals they employ or outsource. 

 

Finally, what are our legislative priorities in this sector? I would have thought the Data Protection framework is more urgent and maybe a Cyber Security one. While I did not intend to comment on the contents of the Bill, I can't help but notice that one ICT Association of Kenya will have the arduous task of appointing five (out of nine) people to the Council that will regulate professionals (Section 4). Pray tell, who is this association? 

 

Regards, 

 

2016-07-05 14:03 GMT+03:00 Alex Watila via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>:

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: nairobi-gnu@googlegroups.com [mailto:nairobi-gnu@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim Schofield
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:37 AM
To: nairobi-gnu@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [nairobilug] Draft National ICT policy

This could be a crushing blow to Kenya's ICT industry. If the USA had such a law then so many of their major ICT companies would never have happened. To name but 2, neither Steve Jobs nor Bill Gates gained any formal ICT qualifications, in fact neither of them passed a degree in anything. Several of the leading Linux kernel developers have no formal ICT training.

Tim

On 4 July 2016 at 14:04, Tony White <tony.mzungu@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...and *this*:
>
> http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/bills/2016/InformationCo

> mmunicationTechnologyPractitioners_Bill_2016.pdf
>
> Which was introduced in the National Assembly last week, which will
> rquire all ICT 'practitioners' to be licenced (annually!!) and
> registered, with examination of qualifications, and ongoing
> 'training'!!
>
> Phew!!
>
> Tony
>
> On 04/07/2016, Ibrahim Ng'eno <eebrah@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Y'all have seen this[1], yes?
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.information.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Draft-Nationa
>> l-ICT-Policy-20June2016.pdf
>>
>> -- Ibrahim
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Nairobi GNU/Linux User Group" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to nairobi-gnu+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to nairobi-gnu@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
> --
> Tony White
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nairobi GNU/Linux User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nairobi-gnu+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to nairobi-gnu@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Course View Towers,
Plot 21 Yusuf Lule Road,
Kampala
T   +256 (0) 312 314 418
M +256 (0) 752 963 325
www.weberpafrica.com
Twitter: @TimSchofield2
Blog: http://weberpafrica.blogspot.co.uk/


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nairobi GNU/Linux User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nairobi-gnu+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to nairobi-gnu@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.



 

--

Grace L.N. Mutung'u
Nairobi Kenya
Skype: gracebomu
Twitter: @Bomu

<http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/profile/GraceMutungu>

 

PGP ID : 0x33A3450F



--

Watch African TV live online and learn about Digital Television policy, regulation and technology in Africa on issues relating to Consumers, Content and Coverage. 



_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ggithaiga%40hotmail.com The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.

<ATT00001>

_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/arebacollins%40gmail.com The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.