Makali has put forward my prefered approach. His approach allows for real 'public participation' by allowing representation of views by the public. For private media, it's impractical to have 155 persons on live TV continuously for 10 or so days. May the coverage be on the final shortlist, instead. I doubt there's need to attack the character of the Chair of PSC. Instead, submit representations to PSC about the candidates by Thursday, demand public rep. is allowed to be present at interviews and limit live broadcast to fewer candidates. On 4/30/13, dmakali@yahoo.com <dmakali@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mayb we need to interrogate the meaning of "public participation" threshold of the constitution. Does watching or holding a recruitment process in the open space - on tv or a physical venue like kicc - constitute public participation or is it that every citizen is free and has an opportunity to be considered and to raise any matter pertinent to the recruitment and potential recruits that counts?
Methinks the latter, which has been complied with by psc advertising and inviting any1 interested to apply. That also meets the "competitive" criterion.
The next demand we should put on them is to facilitate or make it possible for any1 who wants to sit in the room to observe the process or to submit any information that may assist it to recruit the right candidates do so. That complies with the transparency requirement.
The interviews can otherwise become a farce at this stage if the template is applied across the 155 applicants. The live broadcast can come at the final stahe wen the shortlisted go before Parliament where scrutiny should be even more thorough and of a different kind - political and ideological.
David
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-----Original Message----- From: Edith Adera <eadera@idrc.ca> Sender: "kictanet" <kictanet-bounces+dmakali=yahoo.com@lists.kictanet.or.ke> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:25:20 To: <dmakali@yahoo.com> Cc: mediaeditors \(mediaeditors-bounces+dmakali=yahoo.com@lists.kictanet.or.ke\)<mediaeditors-bounces+dmakali=yahoo.com@lists.kictanet.or.ke>; KICTAnet - Media Editors Forum<mediaeditors@lists.kictanet.or.ke>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Why Barr the Media from PS Interviews?
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/dmakali%40yahoo.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications. _______________________________________________ mediaeditors mailing list mediaeditors@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/mediaeditors
This message was sent to: wainaina@madeinkenya.org Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/mediaeditors/wainaina%40madeink...
-- * Live simply, love generously, care deeply, speak kindly and trust in our Creator who loves us. *