Dear Ali and All


We cannot be sure how the ICANN Board will respond to GAC advice on new gTLD safeguards, but comment in an video interview with Fadi Chehadé and Steve Crocker (<http://www.icann.org/en/news/press/kits/beijing46/video-post-meeting-12apr13-en.htm>) indicate they will put the section of the GAC communiqué on safeguards for pubic comment. This seems to be the best and correct course of action. However, I am not sure how that will impact on the time lines for delegation of new gTLDs, especially if there are differences in interpretation of GAC advice.

On the safeguard advice, we must acknowledge that governments have a role to play. We expect that they would provide policies/policy direction for the protection of users/consumers to enhance trust in online activities and indeed in the new gTLDs. If you all recall our discussions regarding online behaviour during our elections, we all appreciate governmental role and indeed roles of all other stakeholders. It would be good if Kenyan stakeholders had a look at the safe guards being proposed and provided input if and when a public comment period is opened.

 

The role of governments in ICANN's multistakeholder model evolved after the 2009 Affirmation of Commitments (AoC), replaced the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States Department of Commerce, providing international stakeholders, particularly governments, more say in how ICANN manages the DNS.
        
Under the AoC, 3 review teams were created, WhoIs, Security stability and resiliency (SSRT) and accountability and transparency (ATRT). The first reviews teams completed their reviews in 2012. The first ATRT provided recommendations including the role and effectiveness of the Governmental Advisory Committee, public Input and public policy processes, and review mechanisms for Board decisions. Recommendation 11 and article XI of ICANN bylaws mandates that "The advice of the Governmental Advisory Committee on public policy matters shall be duly taken into account" with a view to speeding up the process. It goes further to say that if GAC and board are not able to come to an agreement, the action that the board intends to take against GAC advice would have to be adopted by majority vote (2/3) of board members.


The second ATRT has started its activities and expected to deliver final recommendations by end of 2013.  Our very own Fiona Asonga is on this team (she was not appointed by government :-) ) Congratulations Fiona.
      
Regarding Kenya's position on the AUC application, it has been guided by several processes, as you have rightly pointed out, including the African ministerial summit, 2010 Abuja declaration, which provided the African Union Commission with the mandate to "establish dot Africa as a continental Top-Level Domain for use by organizations, businesses and individuals with guidance from African Internet Agencies" and "set up the structure and modalities for the implementation of the dotAfrica project"  In addition, the AU heads of state summit. Our former Minister and president participated in all of these AU/AUC processes.
      
 On appointments to the GAC and indeed any other roles that require representing the country’s position, good questions for further discussions.

 

On the policy role of the CCK, it is a regulatory authority, to what extend should it be involved in policy formulation? is another good question


Best,

Alice
      
      
     





On 18/04/2013 16:15, Ali Hussein wrote:

Listers


For those who followed the goings on at ICANN 46 in Beijing there seems to be a concerted effort from Governments worldwide to endanger the freedoms we have enjoyed on the internet.


See GAC communique attached.


While I applaud the GAC for having reached consensus to object to two applications, one of them dot Connect Africa, my personal opinion is that the same (in my opinion) retrogressive elements who derailed WCIT12 are at play again with some GAC members trying to introduce/recommend to ICANN a complete redesign of the underlying policies for approving new top level domains.

To quote from the article below (see link)

'The GAC has interpreted the task of providing advice on public policy as a mandate to start from scratch and revisit every policy issue related to the use of domain names that has been debated since 1999. Six years of work by the Generic Names Supporting Organization, which is supposed to develop policy, has been ignored.'

http://www.internetgovernance.org/2013/04/11/who-needs-the-itu-when-you-have-a-gac/

I understand though that various ICANN constituents requested that the GAC advice on safeguards be put under public comment and I think this will be a good thing in protecting the multistakeholder model of policy making at ICANN.

But all the same, what should we make of this? Is the Multi-Stakeholder model under attack? As it was in Kenya during deliberations towards WCIT12 in Dubai?

And what is Kenya's position on the safeguards?


Can the new Kenya GAC Rep please enlighten us?


Talking of the Kenya GAC Rep, we understand there have been some very embarrassing situations where he contradicted the Kenya Government Stand on the African Union Commission (AUC) .Africa gTLD application. He is purported to have supported a competing application from DotConnectAfrica (DCA) against the AUC application which is supported by African countries including Kenya. See attached letter from our former Minister of Information, Mr. S. Poghisio.


By the way, how is the Kenya GAC Rep appointed?  We had Alice Munyua and Michael Katundu  and then now it seems there is Sammy Buruchara who was recently appointed to apparently replace Alice Munyua, whose term was ending after the Beijing meeting having been the vice chair of the GAC. This is a terrible mess that points us as amateurs without an inkling of where our heads are at..


The link below paints a sorry picture of a country at odds with itself. The gist of the matter is this:-


http://tandaabiashara.com/icann-gac-ignores-kenya-advice-on-dotconnectafrica-dotafrica-application/


Who should we believe? Michael Katundu and Sammy Buruchara or the former minister of information who attended the African Union Ministerial summit in Abuja and other summits which clearly mandated AUC to initiate the process to acquire the dot AFrica TLD. The Minister had following these summits sent a clear message to ICANN regarding Kenya's support for the AUC application for .Africa (see letter attached) and there is also our former President who attended the African Union Heads of State summit that yet again mandated the African Union Commission to pursue and implement an Africa TLD.


Listers, I invite you to make your own conclusions based on the evidence and documentation attached and linked to this posting. The link below is telling:-


http://tandaabiashara.com/icann-gac-ignores-kenya-advice-on-dotconnectafrica-dotafrica-application/


Note that on this link DCA also claims to have an endorsement letter from the same minister. What a mess!


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gifI make a personal appeal to Dr. Ndemo to right this situation quickly as we risk the good name of our country.


This is serious as it paints the country in very bad light in the international community and needs to be put to a stop. Should Kenya's Representative be going against government positions? Were they briefed regarding the government position on the AUC dot Africa application?


Lastly listers this also begs a question that has been burning me for a while:-


Who is responsible for Policy Formulation in the ICT Space? Is the CCK or the Wider Government through the Ministry of Infocom?  It is important that we interrogate this issue since we are seeing a slow creep of CCK Apparatchik in policy processes and engagement as opposed to regulation, enforcement and enablement. If this is the case then it needs to be very clearly mandated through new law. Or am I missing something? I stand corrected though if I am wrong in my assumptions.

We are leader in Africa in this space and we must act the part. We shouldn't be seen to stumble and look like fumbling teenagers when it comes to our engagement in international fora. The Kenyan Private Sector, Non-Profits and Government must be seen to move in tandem like a well-oiled machine. We should strive to avoid another disaster like WCIT12 and now our GAC involvement in ICANN 46, Beijing.


 

Ali Hussein

CEO, 3mice interactive media ltd

Partner, Telemedia Africa Ltd

 

Tel: +254713601113

Twitter: @AliHKassim

Skype: abu-jomo

LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim

Blog: www.alyhussein.com


Any information of a personal nature expressed in this email are purely mine and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the organizations that I work with. 


_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.