The first sentence does not lead to the second and third:
"We cannot have high unemployment, and at the same time import clothes from Sri Lanka or mitumba, when we can grow cotton and make our clothes. We must defy economic explanations on what works and what does not work. If we deployed thousands of youth digitizing land records, we would reduce caseloads in courts, become more efficient, and create more wealth to grow our economy."
Kenya should go towards counter-cyclical employment of youth doing productive infrastructure work: being teachers, building railroads, digitizing land records, etc...
However, you can't forget Adam Smith who talked extensively of Comparative Advantage (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage). Sri Lanka (or really Bangladesh) has a far more economical solution for producing cotton clothing than Kenya has. This mostly has to do with the port of Mombassa being a stranglehold and the fact that a 40M person economy (Kenya) doesn't have the same economy of scale as a billion person economy (a guess at the number of people a Bangladeshi factory can export to easily).
Kenya is a small country and a small economy and if it wants to bring in more money and reduce unemployment, the solution is around creating an amazingly well-educated population and doing more knowledge work - not producing more clothing.