On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Waweru <daniel.waweru@gmail.com> wrote:
One case, at least, strikes me as obvious: if you have good reason to think that broadcasting material would lead to a direct threat to the safety of some other person, then there's good reason not to broadcast it.
That is true, but that is an editorial judgement on the part of the media house/radio station/newspaper. If they violate the law, then there MUST be consequences. If there's
a means of communication which persistently puts out stuff that meets that standard, then there's a pretty good case for shutting it down.
if it is a single radio station for example, then yes, a court could find them in violation of the law and order them to cease. That doesn't mean ALL radio stations should be shutdown. that's is my 2 bob anyway. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel