Thanks Rachel, this is indeed quite useful. May i suggest that CA organizes a forum with key stakeholders to discuss the implementation of USF. Regards, Victor *Victor Kapiyo* Advocate of the High Court of Kenya & Commissioner for Oaths *Suite No. 8, Centro House, Westlands, Nairobi* *Office Tel: 020 440 4410; Cell: 0721 847 178 * ==================================================== *“Your attitude, not your aptitude, will determine your altitude” Zig Ziglar* On 20 January 2017 at 09:29, Ali Hussein via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Thank you Rachel.
*Ali Hussein* *Principal* *Hussein & Associates* +254 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." ~ Aristotle
Sent from my iPad
On 20 Jan 2017, at 7:35 AM, Alwala, Rachel <Alwala@ca.go.ke> wrote:
Hi Hussein. This is noted. The responses are based on the questions. My first submission showed all the USF projects that are being implemented on voice.
We shall continue to engage because it is beneficial for us in our work and the community too.
Rachel
From: Ali Hussein <ali@hussein.me.ke> Date: Friday, January 20, 2017 at 6:59 AM To: KICTAnet Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> Cc: Rachel <alwala@ca.go.ke> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Updates on the Operationalization of the Universal Service Fund
Rachel
Thank you for your detailed responses. I however think that your answers have focused a lot on the education sector. This is definitely commendable but I would like you to address the issue beyond education. To reiterate:-
1. Counties that have less than 10% coverage of internet infrastructure. You will agree with me that this is a major priority.
2. Counties that have good connectivity around the county headquarters and then things get real bad. There are ISPs like Liquid that are trying to bridge this gap. I'm looking for specific incentives put in place by USF to help close this gap. Can you let us know if there are any initiatives to this end?
3. I'm not holding my breath for ICTA to respond to my query. However, I think this issue of utilizing USF to bridge the gap of last mile connectivity from the NOFBI nodes is something to consider.
Lastly, could we humbly request that USF holds an open day soon to engage with the ICT Community and the public at large? A suggested thrust of this open day could be:-
* X years of USF. Bridging the Gap of Internet Connectivity to realize the Digital Government Promise.*
Thanks Rachel. We appreciate your feedback.
*Ali Hussein* *Principal* *Hussein & Associates* +254 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." ~ Aristotle
Sent from my iPad
On 20 Jan 2017, at 12:08 AM, Alwala, Rachel via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Hi Collins,
Sorry this is not available on PDF but hope it is useful as is.
Rachel
From: kictanet <kictanet-bounces+alwala=ca.go.ke@lists.kictanet.or.ke> on behalf of KICTAnet Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> Reply-To: KICTAnet Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> Date: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM To: Rachel <alwala@ca.go.ke> Cc: Collins Areba <arebacollins@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Updates on the Operationalization of the Universal Service Fund
Thanks so much Rachel. Is this available in detail preferably on pdf?
Regards,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Dear Rachel,
Thank you for sharing.
A lot more has to be done to create incentives for connectivity even in economically "non-viable" areas to ensure that no part is left behind and it is safe to say that the connectivity of these areas could actually spur economic growth.
The most critical query however is in regards to how much is held in the fund and what is remaining. It is appreciated that all the above details have been shared in regards to the research and the implementation carried out so far, but it would be great to have all these backed by the numbers in regards to how the funds are utilised. This will enable us to know if the fund can adequately cater for our immediate future needs or if we need to think of other ways of bolstering the fund.
Kind regards,
Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu.
On 18 Jan 2017 05:34, "Ali Hussein via kictanet" < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Rachel
Thank you for the comprehensive report. I'm curious:-
*Table 2: Sub-location population 3G coverage*
*Coverage*
*100%*
*>90%*
*50% - 90%*
*< 50%*
*0%*
*Sub-locations*
*2,454*
*1,324*
*1,146*
*977*
*1,244*
If you look at the above table and go down to specific counties you will agree with me that High Speed Internet is still a rumour in many areas of the country. I want to pay special attention to the counties below where we have less than 50% 3G coverage.
*Table 4: Estimated 2G and 3G Network coverage by County*
*County*
*2G (%)*
*3G (%)*
Baringo
87.7
49.1
Elegeyo Marakwet 97.1 34.7
Garissa
58.1
4.6
Isiolo
54.7
16.4
Kajiado
74.4
38.9
Kilifi
91.9
51.5
Kitui
89.2
49.8
Kwale
91.5
46.4
Laikipia
90.8
48.9
Lamu
82.4
34.4
Mandera
66.9
9.4
marsabit
56.6
25.2
Narok
86.7
29.9
Samburu
55.5
14.0
Taita-Taveta
96.4
43.4
Tana River
85.8
12.8
Turkana
34.8
10.2
Wajir
48.2
8.4
West pokot
69.0
13.3
In the current era of eCizitenship where a lot of government services are moving online are we not disenfranchising a huge swath of the country?
My comments questions are:-
1. Are the above statistics realistic in the true sense of the word? What I mean is this:-
If you take Garissa, Wajir and Mandera where coverage is less than 10% I wonder whether taking into account huge parts of these counties (or any other county for that matter) that are probably not inhabited is realistic? Wouldn't it be more realistic to take account coverage in areas where there is a sizable population?
2. In counties like Kilifi, Lamu and Kwale where reliable connectivity is a joke a few miles from the county headquarters it would be good to hear from the USF what they intend to do about this. Whilst empowering a few schools with connectivity is a great idea I think we are missing out on great opportunities and progress where we lack high speed Internet.
3. How are we doing in lighting up the dark fiber that is NOFBI? What incentives are there for the likes of Safaricom, Liquid, Jamii, Airtel, Orange and the mushrooming community ISPs to give them the push to unleash broadband in the furthest corners of this country?
4. How much is currently sitting in the USF? What is the utilization levels, burn rates and the efficacy of the projects they have undertaken? In short can we a financial statements from the beginning to date?
5. Lastly, as we work hard to cover this country with Broadband can the USF consider offering WiFi zones of high speed Internet in EVERY COUNTY at hugely subsidized prices to enable citizens access eGovernment Services? A good place to start would be in ALL Huduma Centres and say within a 3 km radio of every Huduma Centre?
Thank you Rachel for showing us how community engagement by a Government Agency can enhance collaboration and shed light on issues of strategic interest to the country.
*Ali Hussein* *Principal* *Hussein & Associates* +254 0713 601113
Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit." ~ Aristotle
Sent from my iPad
On 17 Jan 2017, at 12:09 PM, Alwala, Rachel via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
*Table 2: Sub-location population 3G coverage *
*Coverage *
*100%*
*>90%*
*50% - 90%*
*< 50%*
*0%*
*Sub-locations*
*2,454*
*1,324*
*1,146*
*977*
*1,244*
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/m ailman/options/kictanet/chemukoechk%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/m ailman/options/kictanet/arebacollins%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards,
Collins Areba, Kilifi, Kenya. Tel: +*254 707 750 788 */ *0731534124* Twitter: @arebacollins. Skype: arebacollins
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/options/kictanet/vkapiyo%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.