Dear Eric,

 

I’m trying to locate someone to give us some insights on this here in Dar, will report as soon as I’m successful. Meanwhile on a sort of different but related development, there is an initiative to have a regional knowledge sharing network for East Africa in line with the various joint ICT4D activities that are either being implemented or in the works. The coordinators of the three networks you mentioned (SWOPNET, iNETWORK and KICATNET) have already had several initial online discussions on the structure and operations of the regional network. I believe this would add a lot of value to discussions like these where we need input from different “jurisdictions” to use your words.

 

Kindest Regards

Harry

 

 


From: fibre-for-africa-bounces@lists.apc.org [mailto:fibre-for-africa-bounces@lists.apc.org] On Behalf Of Eric Osiakwan
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:45 AM
To: APC - Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants
Cc: Kenya ICT Policy - kictanet; discuss@afrispa.org
Subject: Re: [Fibre-for-africa] Whats i have being talking of as a publicprivate partnership in ownership of the critical infrastructur

 

Dear All,

 

In my rush to attend to some emergency yesterday i did not read over so ended up with french (not good enough french for Bill to read.....:-) instead of english so please allow me to come again. Also this is being monitored on the KICTANET list so i have made an extension to them as well as to the AfrISPA list on which this is taking space.

 

Anriette,

 

The principle is the same however since EASSy was spanning multiple jurisdictions, it waranted multiple platforms for the stock market activity but the Kenyan one (TEAMS) is a single domain so in my mind the question should be "would it make sense for it to trade on one exchange or the multiple approach would generate much scale in terms of the financial lifting that is expected and the activities thereoff?" In someway Brian seems to suggest a multiple approach but i have a knowledge deficit of the East African Stock markets co-operatin and how this may work. Am aware that SWOPNET in Tanzania is similar to KICTANET and iNETWORK in Uganda also has the same semblance so if KICTANET liases with those camps we could get some country info on the dynamics at play or someone from the lists could feed us with some knowledge (at least am interested in knowing.....:-)

 

YES, it looks like a race (NOT A RAT RACE...:-) but the precedent of very low cost bandwidth and non-discriminatory practise must be a guiding light.

 

Eric here

 

NB: Bill, thanks for the heads up. For those who are seeing this for the first time, below is MY french version of the english rendition above so if you dont understand the french dont worry, just stick to the english and you would not have missed anything at all.....:-)

 

 

On 27 Nov 2006, at 20:06, Eric M.K Osiakwan wrote:



Anriette,

 

The principle is the same however since EASSy was spanning multiple jurisdictions then it warantted multiple platforms for the stock market activity but the Kenyan one is a single domain so in my mind should be that would is make sense for it to trade on one exchange or the multiple approach would generate much scale in terms of the financial lifting the expected activities?

 

YES, it looks like arade but the precedent of very low cost and non-discriminatory practise must be a guiding light.

 

Eric here

 

 

On 27 Nov 2006, at 22:19, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:



Dear Eric

 

A group of us APC people actually discussed your idea quite intensively a

while ago.

 

The one difference between what is happening here, and what you propose,

is that the Kenyan initiative will involve only one stock exchange.... so, if the

IPO continues, it will be listed in Kenya... as far as I know.

 

Your proposal would have involved the 'entity' listing on multiple stock

exchanges.... that would have been much more complicated.

 

Seeing these new financial models emerge is very interesting.  And it does

feel a bit like a race... whose cable will light up first?  Who will sell the

cheapest bandwidth?  Any bets?

 

Anriette

 

 

Folks,

 

Below is exactly what i have being chanting as a way forward in the

ownership of the infrastructure; The Kenya Government will have a 40

per cent holding in the project, Etisalat 20% and the remaining 40%

will go to investors in the East African region. The Government has

said it will organise an IPO on the Kenyan Stock Exchange. Several

Kenyan companies have expressed interest and one said that the

Government had told them it would "guarantee their loan". The

details of the finance package have not yet been settled  but it is

unclear where the Kenyan Government will raise its 40% from. Will the

World Bank simply shift a portion of its EASSy funding to the new

project as many think likely?

 

NB; From this week's Balancing Act, full story below for your

pleasure.

 

Thank God the Kenya are experimenting with this approach where

government owns part, private sector owns part, educational

institutions should also own part, CSO owns part through IPO on the

stock market.

 

The Kenya government can actually raise the 40% from government bonds

and am not an expert on the stock market discipline of shares or

bonds but this is where the financial experts need to come out with

innovative solutions that can help raise much of this money locally

and it is possible.

 

In the attached paper which is an output of the great work Rahul

Tongia did with some colleagues and little input from me, it is clear

that we could actually wire Africa up with fiber to the most

population densed centres for a billion dollars whcih means if every

African put a dollar on the table we could wire Africa up with fiber

and 50 percent of that dark fiber already exist - what does that mean

to you as an African?

 

 

You Kenyans are showing the way and even it it does not work you

would be know for showing us how this model is not workable and then

we can try another. We Africans must try new ways of doing these

things and make our own mistakes and find our own solutions to our

problems but learn to avoid the mistakes of the Americans, Europeans

and Asians. Thank God for this BOLD move, it is commendable.

 

 

TOP STORY: KENYA BEGINS THE COUNTDOWN TO CHEAP INTERNATIONAL FIBRE

_____________________________________________________________________

 

It´s like waiting for a matatu. You wait for ages and none come

along. But just when you´re about to give up hope, three come along

at the same time, all trying to come to a screaming halt in front of

you. Kenya now has three (or more) potential international fibre

projects that could be complete within 12 months. Each one is loudly

proclaiming that it will deliver cheap international bandwidth.

Russell Southwood took the temperature in the market last week about

what the impact of this bandwidth will be upon the market.

 

The Kenya Government has signed an MOU to build a fibre link to

Fujairah

in the UAE currently costed at Ksh5.7 billion. The construction and

supply contract will be awarded early next year and the project,

dubbed The East African Marine System (Teams), will be ready by

November, according to a joint statement issued by both parties from

Dubai. Many in the sector believe that it will be more like 19 months

or more before completion.

 

The Kenya Government will have a 40 per cent holding in the project,

Etisalat 20% and the remaining 40% will go to investors in the East

African region. The Government has said it will organise an IPO on the

Kenyan Stock Exchange. Several Kenyan companies have expressed

interest and one said that the Government had told them it would

"guarantee their loan". The details of the finance package have

not yet been settled  but it is unclear where the Kenyan Government

will raise its 40% from. Will the World Bank simply shift a portion of

its EASSy funding to the new project as many think likely?

 

The Government´s commitment to a 12 month schedule is a bold move

but one that must lay them open to a certain amount of scepticism. The

tender for expressions of interest was only issued 2 weeks ago and

Government timetabling is notoriously slow compared to the private

sector. Apparently the Private Secretary has been telling interested

parties that the Government wants prices comparable to those to be

found in India in 12 months time. This benchmark has been set in order

that Kenya will be able to compete in the international outsourcing

market.

 

Apparently a number of interested parties said that they would put up

all the money to build it if they could have a monopoly and he sent

them away disappointed. But more worryingly one interested party told

us that it could only get involved if it also allowed Telkom Kenya to

be a shareholder.

 

The next international fibre project is KDN´s and it has now signed

its contract with Flag Telecom. Its link from Mombasa will terminate

in an undersea junction in international waters off of the Yemen. It

says the link will be fully operational in the first quarter of 2008,

just 15 months away. The company believes that it will come to market

with capacity at $500 per mbps pm but that the price of bandwidth will

go up to those wanting to invest as time passes. In other words, for

those who commit early prices will be lowest and for those who come in

late, prices will go higher. It also stresses that its landing station

at Mombasa will allow other carriers to co-locate there charging only

electricity and services at cost.

 

So this leaves the third project EASSy looking as if it will be the

third runner. NEPAD appears to have made little more progress on

persuading more African Governments to sign its political protocol.

And whilst the members of the EASSy consortium (that still includes

KDN and Telkom Kenya) are still moving things forward, there remains a

disconnect between the political and commercial ends of the project.

If both of the above projects go ahead, there is clearly much less

need to build the Mombasa-Djibouti section of the route and it has to

be said that both of the above projects have better international

connection points.

 

As if three were not enough, Ethiopia´s ETC has now had its

international fibre connection working effectively for two months via

Port Sudan and Saudi Arabia. But because it is landlocked and it had

endless fruitless arguments with Djibouti Telecom over control of a

possible fibre link, it wants to find a second international fibre

connection. Therefore it is in serious conversations with both of

Kenya´s fibre network operators about connecting to the Mombasa

links when they are ready. If this goes ahead, both it and Kenya will

then have two international fibre links.

 

Because the process of getting the international fibre to Kenya has

been both confusing and "on-off", everyone in the market

(including customers) have understandably not really grasped the

impact of its arrival on their businesses. Until now ISPs and

satellite resellers have largely been in the businesses of living on

the margin they make between buying and selling bandwidth.

 

These margins have been kept high as they have concentrated on selling

to comparatively few customers. Ironically it has been a high-price,

low volume business where their primary commodity - bandwidth -

has  always been in short supply, not least because some of them

increased their margin by contending it as much as possible. This has

meant that bandwidth quality is often variable at best for those not

paying "top dollar" for a premium service.

 

If you argue that international fibre prices should be low price, high

volume, then the national business model changes: what´s sauce for

the goose is sauce for the gander. Bandwidth becomes cheap and

plentiful at a sub $1000 threshold. The margins that can then be

charged make it difficult for those who are not operating at volume to

stay in business.

 

However it does now open up opportunities for new services, content

and applications that can be sold to customers who should now be

paying European prices for real broadband connections (1-2 meg

upwards) rather than the paltry 64 kbps they are currently receiving.

There are at least 500,000 households in Kenya that are at an income

level that make them potential targets for broadband. It would take

only half of those households to sign up for there to be the

beginnings of a very different market.

 

The real sign that the market has not "got it" is that some key

ISPs are not passing on the information about these soon-to-be cheap

prices but are seeking to protect their high margins by telling

customers higher prices. A heads-up, guys. The sector is a village and

news will get round quickly and we´ll encourage the circulation of

this price information. The market´s about to change, get ready to

change with  it.

 

At the national level, there is now a third source of fibre capacity.

Jamii Telecommunications has signed an agreement with the Kenya Light

and Power Company (KPLC) to sell an STM1´s worth of its fibre

capacity in Nairobi and Mombasa, with KPLC saying that it will triple

its capacity shortly. Two other companies - CTN and Cable Vision -

have been granted a licence to sell KPLC´s capacity and it is

telling (in terms of the argument above) that both are in the video

download and pay-TV business. Not so far afield, Tanzanian power

utility TANESCO is currently building out fibre capacity and has

invited bids to sell this capacity. Again KDN is poised to make a

fibre connection to Tanzania.

 

However a recent ping on the Kampala-Nairobi route shows that neither

KDN nor Telkom Kenya has got its fibre route operational. KDN is

promising it will be operational by the end of first quarter 2007 and

that prices will be 20% cheaper.

 

Elsewhere in the market, the new VoIP operators are finding it

difficult

to get interconnection agreements and to get proper service from

interconnect service providers. Telkom Kenya is charging absurdly high

prices but has at least reached interconnect agreements. Nevertheless

the new fixed wireless operators - Flashcom and Popote - are

having difficulties: customers are unable to receive or make calls to

certain countries. Apparently anyone who calls a customer number of

these fixed wireless operators from Germany gets a number

unobtainable.

 

Access Kenya´s Yello VoIP service has been aimed at corporates and

has attracted 250 customers who generate 120,000 minutes a month. But

it has had difficulty getting interconnection agreements with the

mobile operators. It made a complaint to regulator CCK in April and

became so frustrated that it said it would run an advertisement

publicising the position. Safaricom came back to the table but Celtel

refuses to enter discussions, saying that it will do so in its own

time.

 

Kenyan ISPs are under heavy pressure from all the new operators.

Flashcom and Popote are taking more money from data than voice at the

moment as customers are primarily signing up for cheaper Internet

access. Also the introduction of EDGE services by Safaricom is eating

into their high-end customers: one ISP´s CEO admitted privately that

 he was losing hundreds of customers a month to these new competitors.

The challenge for everyone in the market will be whether they can take

the soon-to-arrive cheaper international bandwidth and use it to

transform the market.

 

 

Eric M.K Osiakwan

Executive Secretary

AfrISPA (www.afrispa.org)

Tel: + 233.21.258800

Fax: + 233.21.258811

Cell: + 233.244.386792

Handle: eosiakwan

Snail Mail: Pmb 208, Accra-North

Office: BusyInternet - 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North

Slang: "Tomorrow Now"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------

Anriette Esterhuysen, Executive Director

Association for Progressive Communications

PO Box 29755, Melville, South Africa. 2109

Tel. 27 11 726 1692

Fax 27 11 726 1692

 

_______________________________________________

Fibre-for-africa mailing list

 

 

Eric M.K Osiakwan

ICT Consultant and Journalist

Tel: + 233.21.258800

Fax: + 233.21.258811

Cell: + 233.244.386792

Handle: eosiakwan

Snail Mail: Pmb 208, Accra-North

Office: BusyInternet - 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North

Slang: "Tomorrow Now"



 

_______________________________________________

Fibre-for-africa mailing list

 

Eric M.K Osiakwan

Executive Secretary

AfrISPA (www.afrispa.org)

Tel: + 233.21.258800

Fax: + 233.21.258811

Cell: + 233.244.386792

Handle: eosiakwan

Snail Mail: Pmb 208, Accra-North

Office: BusyInternet - 42 Ring Road Central, Accra-North

Slang: "Tomorrow Now"

 

 



 


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.16/551 - Release Date: 11/25/2006


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.6/566 - Release Date: 12/3/2006