Michael J, Just gone through recent posts and i get the feeling it is MY post that seems to send you back into hibernation. Plse note that my comments have and will always be in good faith - even though they may sound provocative. In Academia we call this Critique-ing (as opposed to criticizing). It is an important part of the critical thinking process and serves to unveil and share knowledge (as it has just done with the sharing of published shareholding values in TEAMs, EAssy, SEACOM). But again not everyone is Academic, and not everyone is that gifted and successfull CEO or that good Politician, or that top Technocrat or that skillfull Internet Engineer, or that Media die-hard or that Consumer die-hard - just to mention a few of the profiles that have continued to define the KICTAnet Value simply by hanging in there - even when they felt totally misunderstood. walu. nb: on a happier note as you hibernate- I have finally pinged from .KE over the Safaricom modem and boy, the results indicate its 3times faster! I agree with Aki's comments. --- On Sat, 8/1/09, Michael Joseph <MJoseph@Safaricom.co.ke> wrote:
From: Michael Joseph <MJoseph@Safaricom.co.ke> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Seacom goes live- wait for TEAMS To: jwalu@yahoo.com Cc: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 9:00 PM
Re: [kictanet] Seacom goes live- wait for TEAMS
I think the allegations and language used on this list really discourage real informative comment.
For information the shareholders of the Teams cable, who are most of the telecom operators in Kenya, will own and manage the cable and will sell their capacity both wholesale and retail as they see fit. The GOK owns 20%.
The Seacom cable is owned by a separate set of shareholders and this info is publically available.
The Eassy cable will be owned by another group of shareholders including a number of African telecom operators. This info is also publically available.
Not one shareholder will want to price themselves out of the market and, as another commentator mentioned earlier, the first to market with competitive prices will gain the most.
I broke my silence on this subject a few days ago and I regret it now as mostly the comments have been somewhat impolite, to put it mildly. I will refrain in future.
Regards
Michael Joseph
CEO
Safaricom Limited
BlackBerry® powered by Safaricom
----- Original Message -----
From: kictanet-bounces+mjoseph=safaricom.co.ke@lists.kictanet.or.ke <kictanet-bounces+mjoseph=safaricom.co.ke@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
To: Michael Joseph
Cc: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Sat Aug 01 19:16:51 2009
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Seacom goes live- wait for TEAMS
Competition?
3 cables does NOT = competition.
As Waudo mentioned elsewhere in his posts, the big boys and girls sitting on TEAMs board are the same ones on SEACOM, EASSy and most likely anything else likely to land in Mombasa in the near future.
Basically you are looking at a conducive\cartel environment for fixing prices - think of our oil industry. Yes you have competition in the name of Agip, Total, Caltex, etc but has that brought down prices for gas?
Probably am being paranoid but I am waiting for the case study where public good won over private profits...maybe it will happen in another 4 months as the PS said. And when it happens it should should not be the misleading by 1-5% price drops. Ideally for the TEAMs
(tax-payers) cable you should be asking for the less than 100USD per MB prices that have been floated around over the recent years. And that should be per month rates NOT the punitive per byte of download rates.
walu.
--- On Sat, 8/1/09, Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Gakuru Alex <alexgakuru.lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Seacom goes live- wait for TEAMS
To: jwalu@yahoo.com
Cc: kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 12:54 PM
Competition!! Yes indeed is consumers
best friend.
In fact, instead of staying out all night pinging, pinging,
and
pinging.. and nothing much changes...then burning ourselves
out
arguing on Seacom pricing, we should now strategise how to
fuel more
competition, confront next connectivity frontier-rural.
Skunkworks are pleased to inform you that PS Ndemo will be
talking to
us about the one million laptops stimulus, technology
innovation and
entrepreneurship- On Tuesday next week (4th August).
I intend to ask him "what would be the government's plans
regards
hooking Kenya up with http://www.o3bnetworks.com/?"
See the attached image.
Regards,
Alex
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Joseph Mucheru<mucheru@google.com>
wrote:
Walu,
I personally think it is a bit simpler than that. Over
the many years we
have lobbied for better services and/or prices in the
country, the one sure
thing that always worked was competition. In the case
of the cables, I think
the competitive pressures are much more for the
operators as the investment
(stakes) are much higher. By various calculations both
Seacom and Teams have
more than three times the current bandwidth demand.
That means the wiser
operators will not only be the ones that are first to
market, but those that
give the right price to attract the economies of scale
they need to ever get
back their investment. Any operator that delays this
process will only have
much more future cost to convincing consumers to get
onto their network.
I am convinced right now it is a consumers market and
what will be
interesting is which operators are able to see things
from a long-term
perspective and win the market. The fact that some
operators have a much
broader and wider local loop infrastructure only makes
this more interesting
and does not give outright victory to one.
In summary, investment in the cables is a sunk cost
and the game now is who
can get the user numbers on their network. Any
short-term gains by an
operator through higer prices will cost them
significantly more in the
long-run.
my 2cts worth
Joe Mucheru
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Waudo,
Difference -at least on paper- is that TEAMS was
put up with Tax payers
money by close to 40% (i think). Â So you and me
have a 40% say or demand
that they sell the bandwidth commodity at cost.
 But you and me (tax payers)
have 0% (zero%) shares in SEACOM.
SEACOM was put up with 100% private money - only
the individual
shareholders can decide on pricing (remember the
famous SAT3 cable on the
west-african cost that had little impact on
pricing? the individual
shareholders decided to keep the prices just 1-5%
below satellite in order
to recoup investment with the shortest timeframes.
 15 years later, the
prcing was still the same at 1-5% satellite costs.
 That is called Business-
increasing shareholders value and yes nobody
should apologies for that)
In short, SEACOM can go the SAT3 way and you and
CCK can shout as much as
they want and they have every right not to care.
 BUT with TEAMS you and i
do have a say - however small it is or it maybe.
And its pretty grey area how say like Safcom with
shares on both cables
can be compelled to reduce prices because if push
comes to shove Safcom can
say their data is strictly running on the
(private) SEACOM cable which is
exempt from all the regulatory pressures. It can
chose to say TEAMS is
simply it back-up route.
Thats why I think we are breaking new ground here
and its going to be very
interesting...
walu.
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
This message was sent to: jwalu@yahoo.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
This message was sent to: mjoseph@safaricom.co.ke
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mjoseph%40safaricom.co....
Note: The information in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the named addressee. Emails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Safaricom Limited does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this email if the same is found to have been altered or manipulated. The contents and opinions expressed in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Safaricom Limited. Safaricom Limited disclaims any liability to the fullest extent permissible by law for any consequences that may arise from the contents of this email including but not limited to personal opinions, malicious and/or defamatory information and data/codes that may compromise or damage the integrity of the recipient’s information technology systems. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete this email from your system.Unless expressly stated by a duly authorised officer of Safaricom Limited nothing contained in this email message may be construed as being an offer to contract or an acceptance of an offer capable of constituting a contract between Safaricom Limited and any recipient(s) of this email.