Fwiw, In the CWG- WCIT meetings I've attended, the interventions by Australia have been reasonable. I've not seen (m)any written contributions from au. Chip On Jun 9, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Alice Munyua <alice@apc.org> wrote:
Yes it is not clear from the article what the Australians are supporting. It's a pity this process WCIT and the ITR's seem to be attracting so much propaganda rather than balanced discussions on the various provisions and the reviews being proposed.
Best Alice
On 09/06/2012 22:36, McTim wrote:
Too bad it doesn't say what the Ozzies are supporting, there are literally hundreds of different provisions of the ITRs!!
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/chsharp%40cisco.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.