Washington:
I am not being personal, everything I have stated here is either what Shem has said himself and what is in public record. One thing about democracy is that the person in power appoints his people. When that person is off power, all his people are replace with those of the new "presidents" political persuasion. I do not see what you guys are whining about.

Under the circumstances, the current leadership would have appointed a village idiot to run CCK because according to them the idiot was qualified and there would have been nothing wrong with that. You are listening way too much to the WB/IFC to be of any good to the country. This guy has worked in CCK - as someone else has stated. He probably knows more about deregulation and ICT than 90% of the subscribers to this list - me and Shem included - because deregulation is an economic concept. I expect him to lead the CCK into the right direction.

Having some ICT knowledge does not make you a good Regulator Manager. The problem with people complaining too much is that their audience stops listening.

Give the guy a chance and stop whining about who should and who should not have been appointed.

And thats my last 2 cents

JOe

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Joseph Manthi <jmanthi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Washington:
> The appointment of a DG, as I said, is political. This we have to live with.
> Instead of Shem giving the guy a chance to fail, he automatically starts
> complaining about what criteria was used to appoint him after failing to be
> considered. What does that tell you about Shem?

He did not whine about having failed to be considered. I'd still like
to stand by the
summary I gave of how I understood him.

> All I am saying is that anyone in his right mind would not hire someone who
> has been accused of gross mismanagement of a very high profile parastatal.

Accused. That's the point. He's not convicted as yet, though in your mind you've
done just that - convicted him!

> And therefore complaining of the DG's appointment using such flimsy reasons
> as that he is not an "informatician" - whatever that means - lends itself to
> questions about impropriety.

"informatician" - I did not look it up from any dictionary, but the
way I saw it,
anyone on this list would easily know what he meant from the context. How
comes you don't?
Anway, I personally do agree with his "flimsy" reasons, since I'd have loved to
see someone with the "relevant industry" qualifications (as opposed to
"relevant political"
qualifications) being appointed to such a position. Political
considerations for appointments
should have been shelved looong time. IIRC, there was strong
proposition sometimes back
for such appointments to be vetted by parliament. How this became a
cropper is so clear
in my mind, but is OT for this list so I will not delve into it.

> The DG is a manager, he is not a technician. Now if he was appointed to
> discuss original thoughts about technical issues then we would have a
> problem.

You miss the point once again! The manager, without having clear and
better understanding
of what the "technician" is talking about, will always swing towards
the whims of his/her
political masters, the technicians best-interests notwithstanding.
I'd hate to try to make an economist officiate on ICT-related issues
which have no bias towards
economics (and that would be shallow anyway). If you were appointed to
be the CEO of a
Kenyatta national Hospital and you aren't a doctor by profession,
guess where the hospital would
be headed?
In summary, Dr. Ochuodho strong proposition was to have
industry-related qualifications considered
for such appointments, not political.

> In every country I know Spectrum allocation is an economic issue and not a technical one.

A very simple case that I know of: Sometimes back, FM stations in
Nairobi were ordered by CCK to
have their transmitters moved from where they were installed initially
to Limuru, because there were
so much frequency interference. Some stations even jammed their
competitors. I don't want to indulge
further into this, but I think the initial decision to let the
transmitters be installed was approved by the "manager".

> In this case the DG - if that is the criteria under contention - is more qualified in my book than Shem.

What Dr. Shem (let me be fair to his rightly earned titles as well)
inferred was simply "to have doctors run hospitals".
I did not see (or maybe I was selective in my reading) anywhere where
he cast aspersions on the person of the DG.

> Further there is no cloud hunging over his head.

I maintain that such cloud is none of our business in this forum. Why
don't you stay focused on the issues
relevant to the subject, than getting personal?

--

Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

"Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!"
--from a /. post

--
Joseph Manthi
CEO
MEO Ltd
http://www.meoltd.com