I totally agree with Ali on this last point.

Kenya does not have "Public Transport" per se - we have privately provided public transport. We've had this messy system provide transport to the public until sometimes we forget there are better systems out there - we only recognize how messy our system is (or the lack of it) when we are in small European nations or some East Asian countries.

NTSA like @Kieti says seem very much in this for revenue collection not for safety purposes or any other thing that they have stated. If it was safety that Matatu that plies from Prestige to Yaya with a gang of mobile phone thieves would have been stopped by now.

I trust the Ubers and the Bolts to ensure safety because it is part of the offering that will keep their revenues alive.

I think government regulatory bodies should take more of a think-tank approach where they set a broad set of standards for compliance for any private company that is providing transport services. So that whether I am doing Safe Boda or Uber or NTVRS or Transline or a TUK Tuk in Mombasa I know there is a limit of time to when myself/my drivers have to be on the wheel... I know there is data I have to collect to comply with safety requirements... I know that there is tax or other levy contribution I need to make to keep the roads usable... 

Such compliance standards should be so general they won't have to change them when Kenya/Nairobi has trams or has a metro (powered by wind energy from Ngong hills)
This circus of "Tutatoa pesa wapi?"  then someone says "Na hawa akina Uber hawawezi toka kitu?" is too much and has to end.

With kind regards


Jeipea

Believe in yourself then you can change your world

____________________________________________
Skype: john.paul.em
Cell: +254735586956


On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:10 PM Ali Hussein via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
The thing that these proposed Regulation is overlooking is the overarching need for a complete overhaul of our Public Transport System. Any mass transit system in the world cannot be left to the vagaries of the profit motive alone. This is where the rain started beating us down. When we killed Kenya Bus Services and allowed the matatu menace to run roughshod over us. 

These new proposed regulations continue to perpetuate silo thinking not just in govt but in the private sector too. 

Time ya kuamka. Masaa ina enda..

Ali Hussein
+254 0713 601113 

Twitter: @AliHKassim

Skype: abu-jomo

LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim


"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."  ~ Aristotle


Sent from my iPad

On 10 Feb 2020, at 11:40 AM, Liz Orembo via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:


  Thank you Ali, Kieti and Bill.

@Ali Hussein  Indeed, we should regulate to grow the sector, not to kill it. From the public participation, it looks like vitu kwa ground is confusion/chaotic. The digital hailing service operators have not been engaging car owners and the government. 

These regulations have also capped commission. The operators are supposed to charge commission to a cap of 15%. to protect the drivers from the effects of competition between the companies. A question though; how did the NTSA arrive at this percentage? Is it fair to cap profits? What are the effects in the industry?

@kieti you raise very valid points. Taxing the vehicle owners and drivers might not be timely. How about the multinationals? Because not imposing tax on them also exposes local companies which are already paying taxes to unfair competition.

@Bill Dian, ill through these questions to fellow listers.
1.What does the Kenyan law say on employees and independent contractors,with the disruption of traditional employment models?
2 The new regulations require digital service operators to operate under Kenya laws,does Labor Laws apply?drivers have in the past complained of lack of representation when deactivated,lack of consultations on price fixing e.t.c?
3.What effect does the regulations have on Data protection,specifically data retention .For instance,the regulations require operators to maintain personal data for period of 3 years,will the operators be required to obtain authorization from Data Commissioner,since they are Data controllers and data processors?
4.What effect does the new regulations have on the model of the gig economy?Does it rip off the independence and flexibility characterised by the gig economy?

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:26 AM John Kieti <jkieti@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

From the apparent justifications for the regulations, I think some issues are being conflated, unfortunately. I am thinking at least 3 issues exist and could be dealt with separately.

1. Accidents and crime - Might it help to broaden the regulations to cover normal offline taxis. If anything digital taxi-hailing provides increased possibility for passenger safety than normal taxis. It seems pointless to provide a fix for what is not really broken.
2. Owners / Drivers / Operator feuding on commercials -  These ideally should be maintained as commercial leasing agreements (drivers with owners) and marketing service agreements (Drivers with operators). The employer-employee narrative misses the point on the platform economy where actors should be considered autonomous and responsive to the market forces.
3. Tax evasion and revenue collection - This seems to be the main thrust of the regulations. To check on tax evasion by operators - Uber, Bolt, etc is welcome and timely. Legal technicalities on tax avoidance will remain. To squeeze out more taxes and fees from drivers and vehicle owners is fair - not sure about timely - If it were me, I would let the gig economy grow roots first, for a couple more years.

Kind regards

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:10 AM Liz Orembo via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:

Good morning listers,

Today we will talk about Digital Hailing Services Regulations and the licensing of the Service Operators under part 1 of the regulations.  

Looking at the document, it seems like the NTSA is trying to regulate the industry following the recent incidents that have come up: eg accidents, assisted crimes and digital taxi drivers woes. These regulations will require any digital hailing services; Uber, Bolt, and Swivl, to register in Kenya and operate under the Kenyan laws. They will also obtain operating licences from the NTSA.

We would like to hear your views on this:
a. Are the regulations necessary? 
b. Is NTSA the right/best body to regulate Digital Hailing Transport Services?
c. What are the likely impacts in the transport industry, Information Society Sector and gig economy? etc
d. Should multinationals be subjected to different licensing requirements?

Here are some resources to guide our discussions.
2. Can California reign tech-gig platforms? A primer on the bold state law that will try. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/01/14/can-california-reign-techs-gig-platforms-primer-bold-state-law-that-will-try/

Over to you listers.

--

Best regards.
Liz.

PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jkieti%40gmail.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.


--

John Kieti
Phone: +254-735-764242 // +254-722-764242
Twitter: @johnKieti // Skype:  jkieti
Blog: gmeltdown.com // LinkedIn: https://ke.linkedin.com/in/kieti

The ordinary just won't do


--

Best regards.
Liz.

PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/

Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/johnpaulem%40gmail.com

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.