I also don't think open sourcing is the solution to all our ills. I mean its nice if I can keep tabs on the source code of all my apps but it doesn't make it useful or effective. The US is the biggest spender of technology as far as we know and if there is anyone with the skill of resources to fully audit all the source code running their systems its them. They are however routinely infiltrated by the Chinese or so they claim. China at some point managed to redirect most of the webs traffic through their servers. My point is having access to the source code doesn't guarantee it will be audited and if audited that the flaws will be found. Windows XP is still leaking with flaws 13 years on. I am sure if Ubuntu had the same install base it would be hemorrhaging as well. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Dennis Kioko via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
The second point means that people still rely on a number of closed source applications even on open source systems. Google Chrome is a closed source distribution based on the Chromium Open source app, same way Android is based on the Android Open Source Project (which excludes the apps you mostly use).
I have also seen a number of advisories for open source users to verify the authenticity of their installations after the Russians and others started inserting compromised open source packages in distributions. I doubt many verify what they download.
Then, those who use open source solutions here, do you distribute open source solutions to your customers too ie, if you wrote an app with an open source language, do you supply it alongside source code.
Again, if people want anything from your computers, they will probably get it, especially if you are online, see a related discussion here http://www.quora.com/Anonymity/What-are-the-best-ways-to-leak-information-an...
Lastly, someone politely pointed me to Mr. Ikua's LinkedIn profile which indicates he is a consultant in the implementation of closed sourced solutions for the government of Kenya. As taxpayers, should we be worried, Mr. Ikua?
Conclusion. Any software you use largely faces the same issues. In 2014, the Open source versus Closed Source debate shouldn't be based on Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014, Ngigi Waithaka <ngigi@at.co.ke> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Dennis Kioko <dmbuvi@gmail.com> wrote:
What stops the NSA from hiring independent devs to contribute to open source code?
No one, they could hire any developer to contribute to open source code, same way no one would stop NSA from hiring a developer to go work at Microsoft. At least if they hire someone to work on open source code, I could always review their work if I deemed it necessary. But then again, why hire the individual developer, when you can pay off the whole company to put in back doors for you?
Does open source run in a vacuum? No. We still download closed sourced Chrome, Flash, Java etc to run on our open source installations. Do these have backdoors?
I don't get the point of this apart maybe from mentioning that Chrome & Java are open source...
How many people actually take the time to go through open source code looking for bugs and backdoors?
Well, how many engineers does Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, WhatsApp have? Most of these firms ran on open source stacks and are leading contributors to open source technologies. Put IBM, Oracle and recently Microsoft that has started to release open source code to that list as well.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 16:52 PM, Ngigi Waithaka via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Mark,
What open source gives you is the freedom and choice to check for yourself whether the code is secure or not. While it is not a guarantee, at least it puts the onus on you.
If we are to discuss security & NSA there are very many commercial cryptography applications that have long been suspected of having backdoors that would be of use to certain governments. Last I chceked NSA pays an annual retainer running into hundreds of millions to ensure commercial vendors introduce backdoors they can use. On top of that, remember when US firms couldn't export cryptography that used more than 1024 bits?
The problem with closed source, you have no liberty to check for yourself. You just hope!
Back to OpenSSL; yes it had a serious bug for long, and I am sure not the last one, but if you look at how the HeartBleed bug came to be discovered and fixed, it was the openness that made this possible.
Coming closer home, and regarding our recently implemented PKI Infrastructure by Koreans, how many would bet we have similar bugs in that implementation? How many would bet that no security audit was done based on the sources and that there is no guarantee of a backdoor in the system?
Again, we can only hope!
Regards
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Mark Mwangi via kictanet < kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Again as Dennis said, there are loopholes even in open source software and so that argument is moot. If governments such as the Canadian one with practically unlimited resources couldnt find the holes then what good is making the code open source?
Open sourcing doesn't make the code more secure by virtue of the action.
Thats not the issue. There is no software that is absolutely secure, open or closed source. The issue is being able to get into the code and find out if there are backdoors where someone else is snooping on your systems and data, especially if you are a Government.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Dennis Kioko <dmbuvi@gmail.com> wrote:
But Mr. Ikua, The equally open source software known as OpenSSL had a glaring hole
for
years, which some suspect the US government might have known about too.
For as long as we have had software, so have we had software bugs, be it open, closed or ajar :-)
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014, Evans Ikua via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
Well put Walu. This is the strategic dilemma of using closed source proprietary software. I am sure the lessons that Russia learns from
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Evans Ikua via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote: this
will inform other governments that you are only as free as the technology that you use.
Evans
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Walubengo J via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
####snip#####
The United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team, a part of
Homeland
Security known as US-CERT, said in an advisory released on Monday morning that the vulnerability in versions 6 to 11 of Internet Explorer could lead to "the complete compromise" of an affected system.
read more
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/technology/chi-microsoft-explorer-sec...
########snip#####
Funny - I keep feeling that the US Gov KNEW about this hole for many
-- *Regards,*
*Wait**haka Ngigi* Chief Executive Officer | Alliance Technologies | MCK Nairobi Synod Building T + 254 (0) 20 2333 471 |Office Mobile: +254 786 28 28 28 | M + 254 737 811 000 www.at.co.ke
-- with Regards:
blog.denniskioko.com <http://www.denniskioko.com/>
_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-- Regards, Mark Mwangi markmwangi.me.ke