Pole sana Crystal - the House Committee meeting with Media was advertised for 3 days in the local dailies....
Brian
Brian,
The meeting was not made public knowledge. If it had been then possibly more would have attended. Myself included.
The Communications Bill contains many well thought out policies that will benefit Kenya in its quest to become an leader in information and communications technology in the region. I read the bill when it came out in its first draft form and twice more during the consultation and amendment period. The bill is still not ready to be passed into law. As it is a serious piece of legislature it needs more discussion especially in open public forums. Once the general public and the media take an issue with a piece of legislation it should be tabled and discussed until necessary revisions are made. I would like to reiterate this bill is not ready to be passed into law. If it is I would encourage the media institutions to challenge its legality in court. It has already been rejected in the court of public opinion.
If what Dr. Ndemo and others say about the ability of the president to amend the act, although Kibaki is in a catch 22, he should see that the media stays free. What Kenyans should be afraid of is giving the government the power to decide on what dictates a "state of emergency". This has been used in other countries to suppress the masses and give all control to a few powerful individuals. The control of the many by the few is something we already see in Kenya. Information and communications technologies are to improve INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS. The proliferation of Kenyan content cannot be stilfed by the law or many will shy away from their use due to fear.
CrystalOn Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Brian Longwe <blongwe@gmail.com> wrote:
I too, feel that this is overreaction and misrepresentation by the media. How many of the very vocal media personalities who appeared protesting have even read the proposed legislation? If they did, they would see that the powers granted are only applicable during a state of emergency. Other laws set out the process and conditions by which a state of emergency can be called.
Our experiences with the post-election crisis this year exposed how partisan and instrumental media can be to fuel discontent and in many cases, media related information was used to take lives.
Have the more responsible media houses forgotten so quickly the regret and guilt they expressed, when they started crying out for peace - after they realised how seriously wrong their transmissions were taken by the public?
It is true that when Govt invited stakeholders to make representations regarding the bill, the media houses that bothered to send personnel sent only very junior officials - there's no knowing what kind of feedback/representations these underlings took back to their bosses.
How many media houses sent representations to the house committee that was responsible for the bill when they were invited to do so? To what extent did they engage with informed contributions, proposed modifications or even proposed text to replace the offending sections?
People need to realise that things like this don't happen overnight, law-making is a process that provides any citizen with the right and the opportunity to make their views felt and known. The masses that have been mobilised by the media houses should have been in Mombasa when govt, the house committee and stakeholders were meeting to among other things look at sections of the Kenya communications amendment act - not now, when their elected representatives have yielded to the due process and submitted the bill to the President.
my two-pence,
Brian--On 12/13/08, Grace Bomu <nmutungu@gmail.com> wrote:I had signed up for the mars group protest yesterday on the
representation that it was a protest on food prices and MP'S refusal
to pay taxes.
I am disgusted that the media have used our voices for their causes
exclusively, disregarding ours.
As a Kenyan, i think there should be a review on cross-ownership of
media if democracy is to thrive. Also, considering the role of the
media in fueling ethnic/ regional backlash since 2003, isn't there
need for a check on them?
There may be misgivings on the arbitraly powers conferred to the
Minister in charge of security but media has to be checked.
The media should give suggestions on alternative ways to check them
instead of using all their airtime and acres of newspapers to win
public sympathy.
Finally, they should stop branding it ' media bill' as the bill is not
a conspiracy against media but a bill to amend the communications act.
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
Grace L.N. Mutung'u
+254721898732
+254736091242
Kenya
_______________________________________________
ke-internetusers mailing list
ke-internetusers@bdix.net
http://www.bdix.net/mailman/listinfo/ke-internetusers
Brian Munyao Longwe
e-mail: blongwe@gmail.com
cell: + 254 722 518 744
blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com
meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com_______________________________________________This message was sent to: crystal@voicesofafrica.org
kictanet mailing list
kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/crystal%40voicesofafrica.org
--
Crystal "Naliaka" Watley
Voices of Africa
crystal@voicesofafrica.org
http://www.voicesofafrica.org/
"You must be the change you wish to see" - Gandhi