This is interesting....

I can't help but wonder, why would these powers be shifted immediately after the bruising battle with Safaricom?

If you think about it, there are over a hundred different industries, yet only a few are *individually* regulated. Communications is one of them. 

Why? Because of its broad reach, national importance and complexity ‎(shared resources, security concerns, adhering to international standards)

That's why CA was setup.

Now, you take the power to determine if a firm is engaging in anti-competitive behaviour to a body that practically understands little about such a key industry metrics as an example, how many Telco Engineers do they have? Do they have live data they could use to say check on frequency Abuse as an example?

‎Do they have the guts to stand up to a Kenyan firm that makes Billions in profits yearly when it abuses it's dominance?

Waithaka Ngigi

Alliance Technologies
www.at.co.ke 
From: Nanjira Sambuli via kictanet
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 5:39 AM
To: Ngigi Waithaka
Reply To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
Cc: Nanjira Sambuli
Subject: [kictanet] CA loses power to regulate dominant telcos

It's bound to be an interesting ride!

----
CA loses power to regulate dominant telcos
// BusinessDailyHome

The Communications Authority of Kenya has lost powers to independently monitor dominance and act against its abuse – leaving it with a narrow mandate of licensing new players and allocating frequencies.
----

Shared via my feedly reader



Regards, 
Nanjira.

Sent from my iPhone.