Controlling content on the internet is very hard because "What is a crime in one geographical region is not necessarily a crime in another jurisdiction." There is precedence elsewhere. This was evident in the Yahoo-France Memorabilia Court Case where LICRA complained that Yahoo! were allowing their online auction service to be used for the sale of memorabilia from the Nazi period, contrary to Article R645-1 of the French Criminal Code. The defense rested on the fact that these auctions were conducted under the jurisdiction of the United States. It was claimed that there were no technical means to prevent French residents from participating in these auctions, at least without placing the company in financial difficulty and compromising the existence of the Internet. The defendants noted 1. that their servers were located on US territory, 2. that their services were primarily aimed at US residents, 3. that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, and that any attempt to enforce a judgement in the United States would fail for unconstitutionality. For more information visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LICRA_v._Yahoo! -- ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva For Business Development Transworld Computer Channels Cel: 0722402248 twitter.com/lordmwesh transworldAfrica.com | Fluent in computing kenya.or.ke | The Kenya we know