Dear All,

 

This is my request that we all take some time and restore an objective structure to the discussions on the future of KIPlist. I believe we have a general agreement that the subscribers from KIPlist be combined with KICTANet subscribers. I suggest we move KIPList subscribers to the KICTANet list and move on to other issues. The reason for this is that KIP project comes to an end in the next three weeks so we may all work within the “action” network from 18th of October. Does this settle the issues?

 

 

 

Other valid issues have arisen from the discussion that we could discuss separately after finalizing the migration of KIP members into KICTANet. These issues include:

 

  1. What is the role of the different stakeholders (CS, private sector, govt, donors)?

 

  1. KICTANet is a ‘multistakeholder’ forum which has the support of civil society organisations but should not necessarily be considered to represent the views of Civil Society.

 

  1. We need to nurture trust between stakeholders so that the suspicion on positioning or fighting for funds does not come to play.

 

  1. We need more NGO/CBO involvement in the ICT process/forums. Thus civil society needs to regroup and become more effective in advocating issues of social justice, grassroot implementation etc.

 

  1. My role (and that of other individuals/organisations) within the civil society caucus will be discussed with members of the civil society and the multisectoral forum will be updated accordingly.

 

Regards,

Wainaina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--------------------------------

Oneworld International

4th Floor, Kimathi House

Nairobi.

 

[SMS4theDEAF] : If you have hearing impairment or are deaf, type the words DEAF ON and send to the number 560 on your Safaricom line. You will then receive free News alerts via SMS. To stop receiving the news, please send DEAF OFF.